These sites enable users to: buy and sell goods, including vehicles, real estate, tickets and electronics; solicit and offer various services; design ads to post on the Complainant's website; display ads on profiles across social networking sites, such as Facebook; and search for jobs across numerous locations and industries. A screen shot of the home page of the Complainant's website at appears in Annex 10 to the Complaint with further details of the Complainant's business appearing in Annex 13 to the Complaint. ...
2017-12-06 - Case Details
Así, sobre la presencia digital internacional especialmente con ediciones geolocalizadas en determinados países latinoamericanos, sobre su presencia en redes sociales (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Google plus o el Diario Port en Youtube), sobre los programas que cuenta en el área audiovisual realizando informativos diarios, tertulias semanales o programas de radio con retransmisiones via streaming de partidos del Futbol Club Barcelona. ...
2017-08-11 - Case Details
Complainant is active on its official website “www.kikocosmetics.com” and on several social networks, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Youtube.
Complainant owns numerous trademarks registrations/applications having effects all over the world and domain names registered in several extensions (including ).
...
2019-08-02 - Case Details
According to the page history for the Respondent’s Facebook page for this business, it has been variously known as:
(a) from January 7, 2013 to July 13, 2017 – Hell Yeah Graphics;
(b) from July 13, 2017 to August 6, 2017 – Miss Mafia Graphics;
(c) from August 6, 2017 to September 27, 2017 – Miss Mafia Graphic Design & Advertising;
(d) from September 27, 2017 to June 30, 2018 – Miss Mafia Australia – Graphic Design & Advertising;
(e) from June 30, 2018 to March 23, 2019 – Hell Yeah Graphics – Graphic Design, Websites & Advertising; and
(f) since March 23, 2019 – Hell Yeah Graphics.
...
2019-08-12 - Case Details
The Panel further takes note that the Complainant operates and maintains its own promotional webpage within Facebook and that the accumulated messages contained therein go back to January 30, 2015. The first message states “Welcome to the Moteefe community! ...
2021-04-07 - Case Details
在缺乏合理解释的情况下，专家组认为，被投诉人不可能在不知晓投诉人商标的情况下而是出于巧合原因选择并注册了争议域名，被投诉人在明知投诉人及其商标的情况下仍注册争议域名的行为具有恶意。Facebook, Inc. 诉程飞婷，WIPO 案件编号 DCN2019-0002。
鉴于投诉人的商标在中国市场已广为人知，专家组很难想象被投诉人出于善意使用目的而注册了争议域名。因此，虽然被投诉人所注册的争议域名一直处于消极持有状态，但这不妨碍专家组认定被投诉人恶意使用争议域名。...
2021-02-05 - Case Details
Other facts about our website
Over 7 years we have achieved more than 70,000 followers in most the social media including linkedin, facebook instgram etc. This has not been achieved over night and it has taken more than seven years to achieve with hard work and money spent. ...
2021-02-25 - Case Details
The Complainant additionally maintains a social media presence on Facebook, Google pages, and Twitter.
The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on January 22, 2018, according to the Registrar's WhoIs records. ...
2018-07-11 - Case Details
D2018-0823: “The Panel also agrees with Complainant that the change in website content located at the disputed domain name, and in particular the removal of the associated Facebook page, following the notice of this Complaint, further underscores Respondent's bad faith.”
Philip Morris Products S.A. ...
2018-07-09 - Case Details
Complainant also has a strong Internet presence through its primary website “www.vontobel.com” as well as its various social media platforms including Facebook, Twitter and Linkedin. According to Similarweb.com, Complainant’s website located at its primary domain name received an average of 229.62 thousand total visits during a 6-month period ranging from May 2017 – October 2017. ...
2018-04-13 - Case Details
The website was named as one of the “best places to shop online” by The Wall Street Journal, and is prominently featured on major portal web sites such as Google and Yahoo. Additionally, Complainant’s Facebook page currently has over 300,000 fans.
Over the years, Complainant has complemented the advertising of its 800-FLOWERS Marks with careful brand management to increase consumer perception of the marks as distinctive indicators of the origin and high quality of Complainant’s goods and services. ...
2012-04-16 - Case Details
This is demonstrated by, among other things, (1) unsolicited media attention of the Complainant and its business, (2) search engine results for the Complainant’s trademark, (3) statistical data of the popularity of and traffic to the Complainant’s website provided by Internet information service companies, and (4) the number of followers of the Complainant’s social media offerings, such as Facebook and Twitter. Past UDRP panels considering the issue of secondary meaning have found that even a limited association to be sufficient evidence of secondary meaning.
...
2011-09-20 - Case Details
The Complainant also states that its use of SLEEP ONE trademark on the Internet is prominent, with advertisements through sponsored links on search engines and also a dedicated Facebook page. In the Affidavit attached to the Complainant, the President of Sleep One Inc. points out that the SLEEP ONE trademark “has also appeared in printed, television and radio advertising, as well as on store signage and in many transactional documents used in the course of doing business, such as invoices, business cards and purchase orders”.
...
2011-01-13 - Case Details
In addition, consumers can become a fan of “Corvette” on FACEBOOK.
The Complainant has capitalized on the strength of its CORVETTE mark and uses the trademark CORVETTE on a wide variety of products in addition to automobiles, including but not limited to personal accessories, hats, clothes, car accessories, Die Cast & Collectibles, furniture, posters, tool boxes, watches and clocks and neon signs.
...
2013-02-01 - Case Details
The brand has a strong presence online through social media such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and FourSquare (see “www.facebook.com/gucci”, “www.twitter.com/gucci, http://youtube.com/gucci” and “http://foursquare.com/gucci”), and has dedicated websites such as the main site “www.gucci.com”, and “www.gucciconnect.com” and “www.gucciparfums.com”. ...
2013-06-20 - Case Details
The Complainant’s main website at “www.tonybianco.com.au” has amassed some 2.7 million unique visits over the period May 2009 to April 2012 and the Complainant has achieved over 234,000 “likes” on Facebook.
The Complainant owns a range of registered trade marks including an Australian trade mark for the stylized word “tony bianco” in filed March 27, 1995, in class 25.
...
2012-10-29 - Case Details
The Complainant represents that it advertises its services across a broad range of media, including print, television, and radio throughout the Middle East and international media including global publishers such as MSN, Yahoo, YouTube, and Facebook. According to the Complainant, its advertising expenditures exceed USD 2.5 billion annually.
Against this backdrop, the Complainant turns to the MBC Pro Sports Network, which the Complainant indicates was launched “to great fanfare” on August 7, 2014. ...
2015-03-18 - Case Details
The Complainant also provided copies of webpages indicating that the Complainant has promoted its Virtual FlyBox app via Facebook since at least as early as April 2014, including through some limited use of Facebook's paid advertising feature, as well as via Google+ since May 2014.
...
2014-10-16 - Case Details
He claims to have been associated with for 25 years on his Facebook, titled Bleach Stain Carpet Repairs and LinkedIn without acknowledgement of any previous business. ...
2014-07-14 - Case Details
b) The Respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name:
(i) the Respondent is using the Disputed Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods, in particular the Vodka;
(ii) the Facebook and Twitter page for the Respondent’s goods demonstrate use of the MONTE CARLO WORLD’S MOST PRETIGIOUS VODKA trade mark;
(iii) the Respondent applied for the MONTE CARLO WORLD’S MOST PRESTIGIOUS VODKA trade mark on July 8, 2011 and submitted a statement of use on September 20, 2012 alleging a first use date of June 1, 2012. ...
2013-04-09 - Case Details