Therefore, based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been
established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...Moreover, no disclaimer of non-affiliation with the Complainant is displayed. As mentioned above,
the Panel f inds that the Respondent’s website generates the impression to be visiting a website operated by
the Complainant or one of its af f iliated entities, which is not the case here.
...
2023-12-22 - Case Details
The Panel f inds that the evidence and arguments submitted by the Complainant do not suf f iciently
demonstrate that the three disputed domain names are under common control and/or the dif ferent
Respondents are somehow connected to each other. ...WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2025-04-16 - Case Details
WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.8.
Based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which Respondent may demonstrate rights or
legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...By contrast, the disputed domain name resolved to a website
purporting to be an authorised online store for Complainant’s products, contained content copied f rom the
original website of Complainant, and purport to of fer Complainant’s goods for sale. It seems likely that
Respondent was making prof its through the Internet traf f ic attracted to the website under the disputed
domain name. ...
2024-02-22 - Case Details
The hyphen inserted af ter the f irst two letters of the mark does not
prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s
trademark.
...Having reviewed the available record, the
Panel f inds the Respondent is not known by the disputed domain name or demonstrated any legitimate
reason for registration and use of the disputed domain name. ...
2024-05-20 - Case Details
No response was received.
As at the date of f iling the Complaint, the disputed domain name resolved to an inactive webpage.
page 3
5. ...WIPO Overview
3.0, section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2024-10-14 - Case Details
See section 1.4.1, WIPO Overview 3.0. In the present
case the Panel f inds that as the Complainants are affiliated companies it is both equitable and procedurally
ef f icient to allow the Complainants to proceed with the single consolidated Complaint.
6.2. ...Panels have found that the non-use of a domain would not prevent a f inding of bad faith under the doctrine
of passive holding. Having reviewed the available record, the Panel f inds the current non-use of the
disputed domain name does not prevent a f inding of bad faith in the circumstances of this proceeding.
...
2024-02-20 - Case Details
Thus, the Panel f inds that the Complainant’s
rights in the CARROT trademark have been established pursuant to the f irst element of the Policy.
...WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8 (Additional terms “whether descriptive,
geographic, pejorative, meaningless, or otherwise” do not prevent a finding of confusing similarity where the
relevant trademark is recognizable within the disputed domain name).
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2025-08-26 - Case Details
The same is true for the “.co” country code Top-Level Domain
(“ccTLD”).
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which Respondent may demonstrate rights or
legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...Panels have held that the use of a domain name for illegal activity, here, claimed impersonation/passing of f ,
or other types of fraud, constitutes bad faith. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.4. Having reviewed the record,
the Panel f inds Respondent’s registration and use of the Domain Names constitutes bad faith under the
Policy.
...
2024-04-24 - Case Details
The Panel notes the evidence that the Disputed Domain Name resolves to an inactive webpage, which
supports the Complainant’s submission on that point and f inds that this does not represent a bona f ide
of fering of goods or services, or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use.
...Panels have found that the non-use of a domain name would not prevent a f inding of bad faith under the
doctrine of passive holding. Having reviewed the available record, the Panel f inds the non-use of the
Disputed Domain Name does not prevent a f inding of bad faith in the circumstances of this proceeding.
...
2024-02-22 - Case Details
WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard Inc. / Samuel Walton, WIPO Case No.
D2020-3131 reaf f irming f inding of the previous panel in Tulip Trading.
The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on June 26, 2023.
...The letter set out the
Complainant’s trademark rights and sought inter alia cancellation of the disputed domain name.
Failing a response f rom the Respondent, on November 13, 2023, the Complainant f iled the Complaint.
On November 17, 2023, the Respondent sent the Center the following informal communication in
Portuguese: “O site já foi retirado do ar” (loose translation: The site has now been removed f rom the air).
...
2024-01-11 - Case Details
The
Disputed Domain Name’s resolving website also consists of prominent and f requent use of the SACHEU
Mark alongside identical images f rom the Complainant’s website.
5. ...D2012-0182 and WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.11.1. Thus, the Panel f inds that the Disputed
Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s SACHEU Mark.
Based on the available record, the Panel f inds that the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
...
2025-09-12 - Case Details
Finally, as for the applicable gTLD “.com”, the Panel holds that this can be disregarded under the f irst
element confusing similarity test. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.11.1.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
...The Respondent’s registration in bad faith of the disputed domain names may
accordingly also be inferred f rom these circumstances. WIPO Overview 3.0, sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2.
The Panel f inds that the Complainant has established the third element of the Policy.
...
2025-09-04 - Case Details
According to the WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8, where the
relevant trademark is recognizable within the disputed domain name, the addition of other terms (whether
descriptive, geographical, pejorative, meaningless, or otherwise) would not prevent a f inding of confusing
similarity under the f irst element.
According to the WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.11.1, the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) “.com” in the
Disputed Domain Name is viewed as a standard registration requirement and as such is disregarded under
the f irst element confusing similarity test.
Further to all the above, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a Disputed Domain Name.
...
2026-02-18 - Case Details
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...The Respondent’s actions, including the imitation of the Complainant’s branding and the provision
of false contact information, indicate an intent to engage in illegitimate activity aimed at prof iting f rom
confusion with the Complainant’s mark.
The Panel f inds that the Complainant has established the third element of the Policy.
7. ...
2025-04-17 - Case Details
The Complainant is also the registrant of the domain name , which resolves to the Complainant’s
of f icial public-facing website and f rom which it operates an online store.
The disputed domain name was registered on August 18, 2023. ...Absent any communications f rom the Respondent, the Panel f inds that the mere
inclusion of “Thalia” as the registrant organization in the WhoIs information for the disputed domain name
does not in itself give rise to any legitimate claim of being commonly known by the disputed domain name
pursuant to paragraph 4(c)(ii) of the Policy. ...
2023-12-13 - Case Details
It now operates a global business in various sectors, including f inancial
services through a subsidiary known as ADM Investment Services Inc. It is the proprietor of a number of
trademark registrations in several countries, including the following:
- United States Trademark Registration No. 1386430 for ADM (word mark), registered on
March 18, 1986 for goods and services in classes 1, 4, 12, 16, 29, 30, 31, and 39, claiming a date of
f irst use in 1923;
- United States Trademark Registration No. 2766613 for ADM (word mark), registered on September
23, 2003 for goods and services in classes 16, 35, 36 (including “f inancial and investment services”)
and 42.
...WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2025-09-25 - Case Details
page 2
The Panel has not received any requests f rom the Complainant or the Respondent regarding further
submissions, waivers, or extensions of deadlines, and the Panel has not found it necessary to request any
further information f rom the Parties.
...WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.11.1.
Based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2026-02-05 - Case Details
The
inclusion and misspelling of “group” as “gruop” also supports a f inding a bad faith use. It is signif icant to the
Panel that there is no conceivable good faith use for the Disputed Domain Name. Accordingly, the Panel
f inds that in the circumstances of this case the passive holding of the Disputed Domain Name does not
prevent f inding bad faith under the Policy.
...
2025-08-08 - Case Details
WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.7. The Panel f inds that the substitution of the letters “nn” for the initial letter “m” is a misspelling of
the Complainant’s mark and does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the disputed domain
name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...The Respondent has provided no evidence of actual or contemplated good faith use of the disputed domain
name, nor does the Panel f ind any such use plausible.
The Panel f inds that the Complainant has established the third element of the Policy.
7. ...
2025-06-05 - Case Details
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2009/d2009-1788.html
page 2
5.1, the due date for Response was March 21, 2024. The Center did not receive a Response f rom the
Registrant but did receive an email communication f rom a third party on February 27, 2024.
...UK00003965893 for UEFA EURO2028 UK&IRELAND (f igurative),
f iled on October 10, 2023, registered on January 5, 2024, in classes 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14,
15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32; and
- European Union Trade Mark No. 011322351 for EURO 2024, registered on March 20, 2013, in
classes 3, 4, 9, 12, 14, 16, 18, 25, 28, 32, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43.
...
2024-05-01 - Case Details