Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the
purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.7.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 3
B. ...Panels have held that the use of a domain name for illegitimate activity (here, claimed impersonation/passing
of f) constitutes bad faith. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.1.4. Having reviewed the record, the Panel f inds
the Respondent’s registration and use of the disputed domain name constitutes bad faith under the Policy.
...
2025-09-15 - Case Details
In late January 2024,
approximately one week prior to the f iling of this complaint, the domain name no longer resolved to any
page.”
It appears f rom the record that Respondent was the founder and, for a time, the sole director of LTL, and
was a director of LTSL. ...Respondent asserts, and annexes to the Response an apparently contemporaneous email exchange to
corroborate this, that he acquired the Domain Name on or about December 18, 2018 f rom an unrelated third
party.
According to the Whois record, the Domain Name was f irst registered on November 22, 2018, and was
“updated” on April 24, 2023.
...
2024-04-24 - Case Details
Complainant is unaware of any trademark rights that Respondent might have in the term “reprise f inancial”,
and has received no license f rom Complainant to use the same. The disputed domain names currently
resolve to website pages containing some form of malicious sof tware which Complainant contends shows
that Respondent is seeking to take advantage of the REPRISE FINANCIAL Marks and as such the current
use cannot constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services. ...Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Panel f inds that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names.
Respondent does not appear to be commonly known by the disputed domain names. ...
2023-11-30 - Case Details
The Domain Names reproduce the Complainant’s
trademark in its entirety with the addition of the name of a country or of the two letters code dedicated to a
country. It is not suf f icient to prevent a f inding of confusing similarity.
page 3
The Complainant argues that the Respondents have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the
Domain Names. ...The composition of the 46 Domain Names carries a risk of implied af f iliation to the
Complainant. The Domain Names were also registered in order to prevent the Complainant f rom ref lecting
its well-known trademark in corresponding domain names. ...
2024-03-01 - Case Details
No. 018366106 of August 5, 2021;
The Respondent registered the disputed domain name f rance.eu> on September 21, 2023. The
same does not resolve to any active web page, but is used in an email address in order to send f raudulent
emails to the suppliers of the Complainant.
5. ...The Panel notes here that the disputed domain name is used to send f raudulent emails and
therefore, rights or legitimate interests cannot be conferred on the Respondent.
...
2024-01-22 - Case Details
Although the addition of other terms here, “travel solutions”, may bear on assessment of the second and third
elements, the Panel f inds the addition of such terms does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity
between the disputed domain name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2026-01-26 - Case Details
Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i).
The Panel f inds that the Complainant’s registrations establish its trademark rights. WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.2.1.
...Accordingly, the Panel concludes that the Complainant has proven
the f irst element: the Domain Names are confusingly similar to a trademark in which it has rights.
...
2025-06-30 - Case Details
page 2
4. Factual Background
The factual f indings pertinent to the Decision in this case are that:
(1) the Complainant is a French company, founded in 1996, which sells clothing, shoes and accessories
for women under the trademark SESSUN;
(2) the Complainant is the owner of , inter alia, United States Patent and Trademark Of f ice (“USPTO”)
Reg. ...The Panel f inds that the Complainant has satisf ied the third and f inal element of the Policy.
7. Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
...
2025-08-18 - Case Details
The Complainant also owns the domain name , which resolves to its web site at
“www.chevron.com,” f rom which it markets its business.
The Respondent registered the Domain Name on February 17, 2024, using a privacy service that is the
Registrant of the Domain Name, as disclosed by the Registrar, without any authorization f rom the
Complainant. ...Policy, paragraph 4(a).
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
On the f irst element, the Panel f inds that the Complainant’s registrations establish its trademark rights.
...
2024-07-03 - Case Details
Further, a domain name which consists of a common or intentional misspelling of a trademark is
considered by panels to be confusingly similar to the relevant mark for purposes of the f irst element. WIPO
Overview 3.0, section 1.9.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
...Under the second and third elements, panels will normally f ind that employing a misspelling of a
complainant’s mark signals an intention on the part of the respondent (typically corroborated by inf ringing
website content) to confuse users seeking or expecting the complainant. ...
2025-08-26 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <f ieldf isherslawyers.com> (the “Domain Name”) is registered with
GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant
promotes its services through various means including f rom its website at “www.f ieldf isher.com”
(“Complainant’s Website”) and presently has more than 1,700 employees working in 26 of f ices.
...
2023-12-05 - Case Details
The Panel f inds that the evidence and arguments submitted by the Complainant do not suf f iciently
demonstrate that the three disputed domain names are under common control and/or the dif ferent
Respondents are somehow connected to each other. ...WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2025-04-16 - Case Details
WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.8.
Based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which Respondent may demonstrate rights or
legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...By contrast, the disputed domain name resolved to a website
purporting to be an authorised online store for Complainant’s products, contained content copied f rom the
original website of Complainant, and purport to of fer Complainant’s goods for sale. It seems likely that
Respondent was making prof its through the Internet traf f ic attracted to the website under the disputed
domain name. ...
2024-02-22 - Case Details
The hyphen inserted af ter the f irst two letters of the mark does not
prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s
trademark.
...Having reviewed the available record, the
Panel f inds the Respondent is not known by the disputed domain name or demonstrated any legitimate
reason for registration and use of the disputed domain name. ...
2024-05-20 - Case Details
No response was received.
As at the date of f iling the Complaint, the disputed domain name resolved to an inactive webpage.
page 3
5. ...WIPO Overview
3.0, section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2024-10-14 - Case Details
IQOS is a controlled heating device into which
specially designed tobacco sticks under the brand names “HEETS”, “HeatSticks” or “TEREA” are inserted
and heated to generate a f lavourful nicotine-containing aerosol (together “the IQOS System”). IQOS was
f irst launched by PMI group in 2014. ...The Website furthermore creates the false impression that Complainant has of f icially introduced the IQOS
System into the Iranian market.
The Panel f inds that these circumstances do not confer upon Respondent any rights or legitimate interests in
respect of the Domain Name.
...
2023-12-15 - Case Details
While the addition of other terms “hr-” may bear on assessment of the second and third elements, the Panel
f inds the addition of such terms do not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the disputed domain
name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8.
Based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which Respondent may demonstrate rights or
legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2023-12-15 - Case Details
Therefore, based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been
established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...Moreover, no disclaimer of non-affiliation with the Complainant is displayed. As mentioned above,
the Panel f inds that the Respondent’s website generates the impression to be visiting a website operated by
the Complainant or one of its af f iliated entities, which is not the case here.
...
2023-12-22 - Case Details
See section 1.4.1, WIPO Overview 3.0. In the present
case the Panel f inds that as the Complainants are affiliated companies it is both equitable and procedurally
ef f icient to allow the Complainants to proceed with the single consolidated Complaint.
6.2. ...Panels have found that the non-use of a domain would not prevent a f inding of bad faith under the doctrine
of passive holding. Having reviewed the available record, the Panel f inds the current non-use of the
disputed domain name does not prevent a f inding of bad faith in the circumstances of this proceeding.
...
2024-02-20 - Case Details
The
Complainant adds that it also sells such products via the “De Bijenkorf ” of f icial website. The Complainant
provides evidence in the form of a press release dating f rom 2020, taken f rom the website at
“www.debijenkorf.nl”, reporting that, in 2019, the said stores received 26 million visitors and that the said
website received 116 million visitors online, including international online visitors f rom countries such as
Germany.
...The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The requirements of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy are conjunctive. ...
2024-11-05 - Case Details