About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 12374   document(s)s (0.04 sec)

Rows

<<  <  261 - 280  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4580 for onlyfans-24.com pdf (143 KB)

EU017912377, f iled on June 5, 2018, registered on January 9, 2019, for products and services in classes 9, 35, 38, 41, and 42; - the United States Trademark, ONLYFANS No. 5,769,267, registered on June 4, 2019, for products and services in class 35, f irst use in commerce on July 4, 2019; - the United States Trademark, ONLYFANS.COM No. 5,769,268, registered on June 4, 2019, for products and services in class 35, f irst use in commerce on July 4, 2019. ...Although the addition of other terms here, the generic numeral “24” may bear on assessment of the second and third elements, the Panel f inds the addition of such terms does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the Disputed Domain Name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-01-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4024 for ziprecruitercareers.org pdf (147 KB)

The fact that the Domain Name also contains another term “career” added to the Trademark, does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity (see the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”) section 1.8: “[w]here the relevant trademark is recognizable within the disputed domain name, the addition of other terms (whether descriptive, geographic, pejorative, meaningless, or otherwise) would not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity under the f irst element”). ...The Panel f inds that this further corroborates that the Domain Name has been registered in bad faith and is being used in bad faith. ...

2023-11-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-3699 for dazn.cloud, dazn.mobi pdf (168 KB)

The Complainant af f irms that the platform is not af f iliated with DAZN services, and is page 3 completely unrelated to DAZN. ...This third-party website commercially benef its f rom Internet traf f ic being driven to its website, given that its services are of fered exclusively online. ...

2023-11-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4687 for thehartfordinc.com pdf (153 KB)

The Complainant owns the domain name that resolves to its of f icial website at “www.thehartford.com” and on which the Complainant prominently uses THE HARTFORD Mark to promote and of fer insurance and f inancial products. ...The Respondent’s use of the Disputed Domain Name was also highly likely to confuse Internet users into incorrectly believing that the Respondent was somehow authorized by or af f iliated with the Complainant, and to disrupt the Complainant’s business by using the Complainant’s own website to offer insurance and/or financial services that would be purchased f rom the Respondent, while appearing to be purchased f rom the Complainant. ...

2024-01-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DIO2025-0019 for continia.io pdf (150 KB)

It refers to its own application for a United States trademark CONTINIA, f iled in August 2024, which it states it did not pursue given the costs of contesting the opposition which was f iled by the Complainant. ...The Panel f inds in the circumstances that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. ...

2025-07-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-4644 for legotoyc.com pdf (209 KB)

The Complainant’s products are sold in more than 130 countries, including China. The f irst application for LEGO trademark was f iled in Denmark in 1953. Currently, the Complainant owns numerous trademarks worldwide for LEGO, including the following: 1) Denmark registration No. ...Although the addition of other terms, here “toyc”, may bear on assessment of the second and third elements, the Panel f inds the addition of such a term does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the disputed domain name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-12-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAI2026-0008 for insta360.ai pdf (155 KB)

The Top-Level Domain “.ai” is viewed as a standard registration requirement and as such is disregarded under the f irst element confusing similarity test. WIPO Overview 3.1, section 1.11.1. Based on the available materials, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established. ...By reason of the matters stated in the previous section 6.B above, and with no response f rom the Respondent, the Panel is prepared to f ind the Respondent’s aim in registering the Disputed Domain Name was to prof it f rom or exploit the INSTA360 Trademarks. ...

2026-04-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-1166 for zudiofranchising.com pdf (154 KB)

Nilesh Kumar Pandey Pandey, WIPO Case No. D2023-3604 (). The Panel f inds the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name includes the Complainant’s trademark in its entirety with the additional word “f ranchising”. ...The Panel f inds that the Complainant’s ZUDIO mark enjoys distinctiveness and reputation in its area of business. ...

2024-05-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DIO2023-0035 for keysreim.io pdf (208 KB)

The Complainant owns trademark registrations for KEYS in various jurisdictions, including: - European Union trademark No. 13822838, registered on July 2, 2015, in class 36; - European Union trademark No. 013838792 (f igurative), f iled on July 3, 2015, in class 36; - European Union trademark No. 018256907 (f igurative) registered on October 8, 2020, in class 36; - UK trademark No. ...According to the evidence submitted by the Complainant - which has not been challenged by the Respondent - the disputed domain name has been used for f raudulent purposes. Previous panels have unanimously and consistently held that the use of a domain name for illegal activity, such as phishing, impersonation/passing of f or other types of f raud can never confer rights or legitimate interests on a respondent (see section 2.13.1 of the WIPO Overview 3.0). ...

2023-11-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-3629 for comlng.com pdf (199 KB)

Complainant also shows it incorporates the CORNING Mark into its of f icial domain name which was registered on December 18, 1991, and has been used to access Complainant’s official CORNING Mark website (“Of f icial Website”) to promote and of fer its products to its to its customers under the CORNING Mark. ...The WhoIs record shows Respondent registered the disputed domain name on December 5, 2022, and Complainant states that the disputed domain name has never resolved to an active website but shows with redacted email evidence that Respondent has used the disputed domain name to send emails and claims that Respondent masqueraded as Complainant to engage in a f raudulent email scheme by issuing email correspondence in association with the email address “[…]@comlng.com” to unsuspecting business partners of Complainant requesting payment of invoices, copying Complainant’s of f icial email address “[…]@corning.com” to aid in Respondent’s impersonation to further its f raudulent email scheme. 5. ...

2023-11-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4409 for metaquesthelp.com pdf (157 KB)

Adding the descriptive term “help” does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity. page 3 Respondent is not a licensee of Complainant, and he is not af f iliated with Complainant in any way. ...Panels have found that the non-use of a domain name would not prevent a f inding of bad faith under the doctrine of passive holding. Having reviewed the available record, the Panel f inds the non-use of the Domain Name does not prevent a f inding of bad faith in the circumstances of this proceeding. ...

2023-12-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DEU2023-0032 for crowdstrikeinc.eu pdf (222 KB)

So it’s our. We can talk about the sale of the domain. Our f irst of fer is 150 000 EUR, of fer is valid by f ive working days and must be until 5days. Other of fer will be increased. ...The Complainant and its trademarks are internationally well known, and have a strong presence on the Internet. The Respondent’s f irst use of the disputed domain name demonstrates its bad faith and its ef fort to pass-of f as the Complainant. ...

2023-10-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2519 for instanderlive.com pdf (167 KB)

In the present case, the Panel reviewed the website associated with the disputed domain name and f inds that the content, including multiple references to the Complainant’s trademarks and use of logos confusingly similar to those of the Complainant, supports a f inding of confusing similarity. ...Although the addition of other terms, here, “nder” and “live”, may bear on assessment of the second and third elements, the Panel f inds the addition of such terms does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s marks for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-08-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-1060 for tictaclearn.com pdf (202 KB)

The Complainant1 owns European Union (“EU”) Trade Mark No. 018092420 for TICTAC, f iled on July 9, 2019, published on July 26, 2019, registered on November 2, 2019, in classes 9, 16, 38, 41, 42 (“the Complainant’s Mark”). ...The Respondent owns the following Mexican trade marks for TIC TAC LEARN plus design (“the Respondent’s Logo”): - No. 2295470, f iled on June 28, 2021, and registered on September 7, 2021, in class 45; - No. 2331321, f iled on September 17, 2021, and registered on November 26, 2021, in class 35; and - No. 2341630, f iled on September 17, 2021, and registered on January 7, 2022, in class 41. ...

2025-05-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2090 for hoerbiger-service.com pdf (204 KB)

The addition of the term “-service” in the Domain Name does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the Domain Name and the HOERBIGER trademark. Panels have consistently held that where the relevant trademark is recognizable within the disputed domain name, the addition of other terms (whether descriptive, geographical, pejorative, meaningless, or otherwise) would not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity under the f irst element. ...In sum, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established. B. Rights or Legitimate Interests Under the second element, the Complainant must prove that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name. ...

2025-07-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-4858 for portliandlaathargood.click pdf (182 KB)

The Complainant submitted evidence that the Complainant’s Trademarks have been registered in United States as of April 5, 2022, with earliest priority dating back to March 23, 2016. Thus, the Panel f inds that the Complainant’s rights in the Complainant’s Trademarks have been established pursuant to the f irst element of the Policy. ...gTLDs, such as “.click” in the disputed domain name, are generally viewed as a standard registration requirement and are disregarded under the f irst element. WIPO Overview 3.0, sections 1.9 and 1.11. The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established. ...

2026-01-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-4556 for f1ghana.com pdf (178 KB)

Accordingly, the Panel f inds that the Complainant has established that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark and the requirement under the f irst limb of the Policy is satisf ied. ...Accordingly, the Panel f inds that the adoption of the company name does not qualify as being in good faith under the Policy suf f icient to confer rights or legitimate interests on the basis of paragraph 4(c)(ii) of the Policy. ...

2025-12-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-0462 for thebeckhamhotelcollection.com pdf (161 KB)

Although the addition of other terms (here, “the”) may bear on assessment of the second and third elements, the Panel f inds the addition of such term does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the Disputed Domain Name and the Complainant’s Trademark for the purposes of the Policy. ...However, the Respondent’s failure to file a Response may result in the Panel drawing appropriate inferences f rom such default. The Panel may also accept all reasonable and supported allegations and inferences f lowing f rom the Complainant as true (see Entertainment Shopping AG v. ...

2025-04-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4341 for espace-clients-bourso-bank.com, espace-clients-boursobank.com, imageboursobank.com pdf (147 KB)

Factual Background Complainant is a company organized under the laws of France that is active in the f inancial industry, specialized in online banking, online brokerage and f inancial information on the Internet. ...WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8. Based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established. B. Rights or Legitimate Interests Second, paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which Respondent may demonstrate rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name. ...

2023-12-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-3488 for ofleaked.net pdf (151 KB)

Therefore, based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established. B. Rights or Legitimate Interests Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name. ...The Panel also notes that the Respondent’s failure to respond to the Complainant’s cease-and-desist letter and to f ile a Response further demonstrates the Respondent’s bad faith. Therefore, based on the available record, the Panel f inds the third element of the Policy has been established. 7. ...

2023-10-13 - Case Details