The Respondent is Mumbai Domains of Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Disputed Domain Name is registered with Fabulous.com Pty Ltd in Brisbane, Australia.
3. ...The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name.
There is no authorisation for the Respondent to use the DIOR trademark, nor to incorporate it in a domain name nor to operate the website to which the Disputed Domain Name resolves. ...
2011-02-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is jiangli, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the Complainant’s AGIPI trademark is reproduced within the disputed domain name.
Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-12-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Host Master, Njalla Okta LLC, Saint Kitts and Nevis.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2026-03-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is bai bai, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2026-05-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Amit Kekare, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <777casinonl.bet> is registered with Devexpanse Ltd d/b/a Regery.com
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2026-04-21 - Case Details
L.P. v. Toeppen, 141 F.3d 1316 (9th Cir. 1998) registering a domain name that dilutes a famous trademark with the intent of receiving payment in return for surrendering the domain name is actionable trademark dilution. ...In order to challenge a domain name registration, the trademark owner must provide NSI with proof that the domain name holder has been notified that use of the domain name infringes trademark rights. ...
2001-04-04 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint, together with the amended Complaint, satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Rights or Legitimate Interests
Under paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy, the complainant must make at least a prima facie showing that the respondent possesses no rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name. Malayan Banking Berhad v. Beauty, Success & Truth International,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1393. ...
2020-08-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Muhammad Amin, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-02-06 - Case Details
Respondent is Mario Yagobi, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
Complainant contends that (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainants’
trademarks, (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and (iii)
Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2024-12-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Omar Ig, Morocco.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-05-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Withheld for Privacy Purposes, Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Sagar Bhardwaj, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...When applying the principles established under Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ASD, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0903, the Panel finds that the Respondent’s services are not bona fide, and a finding of lack of legitimate interests in the disputed domain name is inevitable.
...
2021-08-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ahmed Alshahri of Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”), is registered with eNom (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the Domain Name be transferred to the Complainant.
Tony Willoughby
Sole Panelist
Date: August 21, 2015
1 Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ...
2015-09-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is lei guo of Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Xin Net Technology Corp. ...On the available record the website at the disputed domain name does not appear to be used for activities that would fall within the criteria of Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ...
2016-02-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Karl Schnurch, EdenMedia, Seychelles.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Key-Systems GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2026-01-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is da xiong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...DBA Bubble Skincare v. da xiong
Case No. D2026-0229
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2026-03-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is kgrosven oryellomg, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-04-23 - Case Details
Respondent is jeyu map, global, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant contends that Respondent has no legitimate interest in the disputed domain name because
Respondent has no rights to the disputed domain name of which Complainant is aware and Complainant has
not given any permission to Respondent to use the disputed domain name.
...
2024-07-04 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Previous UDRP panels have found that the Complainant’s ARAMCO trademark is famous worldwide. See Saudi Arabian Oil Co. v. Lim Sang Woon,
WIPO Case No. D2019-2212.
The Complainant holds the domain name registered since 1994 which redirects to its main website “www.saudiaramco.com”.
...
2020-09-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Muneer Mohamed of Cairo, Egypt.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with eNom (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Registrar also provided the contact information held on its WhoIs database in respect of the Domain Name, confirming that the Respondent is the registrant of the Domain Name.
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2015-07-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Perfect Privacy, LLC of Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America ("USA") / Henry Stout of Toronto, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with Register.com (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Registrar replied on May 12, 2018, confirming that the Domain Name was registered through it, but stating that the current registrant is Henry Stout. The Registrar also confirmed that the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP") applies and that the Domain Name would remain locked during this proceeding. ...
2018-07-16 - Case Details