The Respondent is Erika Slade of Charlotte, North Carolina, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-03-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is ThrottleUp Marketing LLC, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Domain.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The
Complainant’s domain name was registered in 2009, which is ten years after the registration of the disputed
domain name. ...
2022-06-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ha Nguyen, Viet Nam.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-03-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Juan Videla, Argentina.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Moreover, the Panel finds that the Complaint has been
brought in bad faith and constitutes an attempt at Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.
/Assen Alexiev/
Assen Alexiev
Sole Panelist
Date: April 11, 2025
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Mobility SAS v. ...
2025-04-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kwang Lee, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <1inch.com> the (“Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com,
LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Disputed Domain
Name currently resolves to a standard webpage of the Registrar, offering the Disputed Domain Name for
sale.
5. ...
2024-08-02 - Case Details
Kisch Inc., South Africa.
The Respondent is lili ma, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Secondly, the Complainant contends that the Respondent is not using the disputed domain name in
connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services or fair use of the disputed domain name. ...
2026-01-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tiscover AG, an entity not being identified, of NJ 08401, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
This dispute concerns the domain name <
tiscovers.com>
(the "Domain Name").
...On the same day, the Registrar responded by email to the Center (i) negating receipt of a copy of the Complaint, (ii) confirming that the Domain Name is registered with the Registrar, (iii) confirming that the Respondent is the current registrant of the Domain Name, (iv) providing details of the administrative contact, technical contact and zone contact for said registration, (v) confirming that the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy") is in effect in respect of the registration, (vi) confirming that the Domain Name will remain locked during the pending administrative proceeding, (vii) indicating that the language of the registration agreement is English, (viii) indicating that the jurisdiction at the location of the principal office of the Registrar for court adjudication applies.
...
2003-03-03 - Case Details
Respondent is Weitner A.G, Missionsstrasse 68, CH 4055 Basel, Switzerland.
2. Domain Name and Registrar
The Domain Name at issue is "granini.com"; hereinafter referred to as the "Domain Name". ...According to the principle negativa non sunt propanda it is sufficient for the Complainant to establish prima facie evidence that the Respondent lacks a legitimate interest in the Domain Name (see also Eauto, Inc. v. Available-Domain-Names.com, d/b/a Intellectual-Assets.com, Inc., case no. ...
2000-11-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Assiat Enroy, stroud wears, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with
NameCheap, Inc. ...The Panel finds
that the Complainant has shown that it established its trademark rights before the Respondent registered the
Domain Name; the Complainant has not authorized the Respondent to use its trademark or the Domain
Name; the Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name, indeed, the Registrar identified the
Respondent with a Registrant Name and a Registrant Organization neither of which resembles the Domain
Name; the record contains no evidence that the Respondent owns a trademark registration for the Domain
Name or operates a legitimate business under the Domain Name; and the Respondent has used the
Domain Name to trade on the goodwill of the Complainant’s trademark, by attracting Internet users to a web
page with PPC links, which is not a bona fide commercial use, a noncommercial use, or a fair use of the
Domain Name, in the circumstances of the case. ...
2025-09-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Omar Yass, United States of America (“United States”)
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Barnes Europe Consulting Kft., Heidi Barnes-Watson v. Omar Yass
Case No. D2024-4290
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-12-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is ANCS Spares (Denmark), Wärtsilä, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Squarespace Domains II LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on November 14, 2024. The disputed domain name does not
resolve to an active website. ...
2025-02-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ge Haydon, Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...It has also been
established by prior UDRP panels that incorporating a trademark in its entirety into a domain name can be
sufficient to establish that the domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark. ...
2024-11-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tate Cristale, Otima INC, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the
“Registrar”), United States.
3. ...The addition of a geographically descriptive element at the end of a
domain name is not, in the view of the Panel, typosquatting. Typosquatting is generally considered to be present when a trademark is
misspelled in a domain name, not when a descriptive element is added to a domain name. ...
2025-05-19 - Case Details
Respondent is Abdullah Mahmood, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Respondent, according to the disclosed WhoIs information for the disputed domain name, is a resident of Pakistan who registered the disputed domain name on October 19, 2022. By the time of rendering this Decision, the disputed domain name does not re...
...
2023-01-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Balata.com Ltd., of Hong Kong, SAR of China.
2. The Domain Name
The disputed domain name (hereinafter the “Domain Name”) is registered with SIDN.
3. ...In the upper right corner of the home-page it is stated that the Domain Name is for sale.
On March 13, 2008, the Complainant sent the Respondent a cease and desist letter concerning the Domain Name. ...
2008-07-11 - Case Details
Respondent is Ondrej Pastirik, Pro Region Slovakia of Vysoke Tatry, Slovakia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Astutium Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2014-09-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Name Redacted1.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
1 The Respondent appears to have used the name of a third party when registering the disputed domain name. ...
2023-10-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is wangchao hui, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Realtime Register B.V. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-04-23 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint and the Amendment thereto satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...In Sanofi-aventis v. Conciergebrain.com, WIPO
Case No. D2005-0660, the Panel stated that it:
“…follows what it regards as a consensus view that the test of confusingly similarity under the Policy is confined to a comparison of the disputed domain name and the trademark, assesses independently of extraneous of the circumstances and ways in which the mark and the domain name are put to use. ...
2006-07-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Shoaib Manzoor, XMart Host, Pakistan, Zain Ali and Rauf Bhatti.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CloudFlare, Inc. ...Maier
Sole Panelist
Date: October 24, 2023
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Eli Lilly and Company v. Shoaib Manzoor, XMart Host, Zain Ali and Rauf Bhatti
Case No. D2023-3674
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2023-10-26 - Case Details