The Respondent is Ivan Smith, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
.../Luca Barbero/
Luca Barbero
Sole Panelist
Date: May 8, 2023
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Champagne Louis Roederer v. Ivan Smith
Case No. D2023-1118
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2023-05-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ieva Kalnina, Latvia, represented by Arsy Law, Latvia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-04-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Clifford Environmental Limited, Ireland, internally represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with IE Domain Registry Limited (“IEDR”).
3. ...On June 17, 2020, the Center transmitted by email to IEDR a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On June 18, 2020, IEDR transmitted by email to the Center its verification response confirming the registrant and contact information for the disputed domain name.
...
2020-08-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Alex Poluh, Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the CARREFOUR mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the
disputed domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-01-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Audrey Rickal, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...For the Complainant the passive holding of the disputed domain name amounts to use in bad faith since:
- the Complainant’s trademark, which is entirely reproduced in the disputed domain name, has a strong
reputation and is well-known;
page 3
- the Respondent has provided no evidence whatsoever of any actual or contemplated good faith use
by it of the disputed domain name;
- the registration details of the registrant are private; and
- the disputed domain name is configured with MX and SPF records, allowing the use of the disputed
domain name for phishing attempts.
...
2024-11-12 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
/Knud Wallberg/
Knud Wallberg
Sole Panelist
Date: August 2, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Sanofi v. ...
2022-08-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is James Knight, James Knight, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Wix.com Ltd. ...The Complainant’s trademark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-12-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
/Knud Wallberg/
Knud Wallberg
Sole Panelist
Date: January 24, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
SeatGeek v. ...
2025-01-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is zheng zhou, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Cosmotown, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-01-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kuichuan Wang, Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Cosmotown, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-10-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Wan Chen, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-06-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kris wu, Philippines.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...The Complainant’s trademark is fully contained in the disputed domain name save for “-” in the mark.
Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy.
...
2026-05-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Siarhei Chyzhevich, Brighton, Brooklyn, New York, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Network Solutions, LLC.
3. ...In response to a notification by the Center, the Complainant confirmed on February 1, 2007 that no other legal proceedings exist with regard to the disputed domain name. The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2007-03-20 - Case Details
Paragraph 3(c) of the Rules appears to have the effect of prohibiting a complaint from relating to more than one domain name unless the holder of each of those domain names is the same person. As has been previously stated by the Panel (see Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. ...The corollary, however, is that where the registrants are in fact the same person or they hold a common interest in the disputed domain name (see Kimberly-Clark, above, and Speedo Holdings B.V. v. Programmer, Miss Kathy Beckerson, John Smitt, Matthew Simmons,
WIPO Case No. ...
2015-12-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sheikh Ukasha Elahi, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Visitors of the Respondent’s web pages at the disputed domain name might have
reasonably believed that the contents at the disputed domain name were official, while that was clearly not
the case.
...
2025-02-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Almazs Robinson, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with
NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Notably, the Complainant contends that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the
Trademark of the Complainant, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name,
and the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2025-04-17 - Case Details
Respondent is Bryce St. Martin, Saint Martin, US.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The disputed domain name was registered on August 30, 2023, and at the time of filing the Complaint, the
disputed domain name did not resolve to any website.
5. ...
2024-12-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is john Cater, Gambia (the).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...As for use of the disputed domain name, the use of the disputed domain name to send fraudulent emails
impersonating the Complainant is very persuasive and clear evidence of the Respondent’s bad faith use of
the disputed domain name and typically the type of use the Policy is designed to tackle. ...
2024-06-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Fledis Goncalves, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...In the present case, the Panel finds that the Respondent was more likely than not aware of the
Complainant’s trademarks when the Respondent registered the disputed domain name, as the
Complainant’s business, trademark registrations, and its domain name predate the registration date of the
disputed domain name. ...
2024-06-18 - Case Details
Respondent is Forrest Bailey, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant observes that the disputed domain name redirects users to a webpage where the disputed
domain name is being offered for sale at USD 1,450. ...
2023-02-10 - Case Details