The Respondent is Eng.Tamer Maher Eldebes, Royalways Roads Contracting L.L.C., United Arab Emirates.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-07-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Dave James, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Disputed Domain Name is registered with 1&1 IONOS SE (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel moreover accepts the Complainant’s contention that the Disputed Domain Name has been registered in bad faith, since an email server is configured on the Disputed Domain Name.
...
2021-07-05 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Panels have found that the non-use of a domain name would not prevent a finding of bad faith under the
doctrine of passive holding. Having reviewed the available record, the Panel finds the non-use of the
disputed domain name does not prevent a finding of bad faith in the circumstances of this proceeding.
...
2024-06-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Admin, GuardPrivacy.org, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with
Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Domain Admin, GuardPrivacy.org
Case No. D2025-3153
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2025-09-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Host Master, Transure Enterprise Ltd, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Above.com, Inc. ...The disputed domain name also may be for sale as there is an option
to buy this disputed domain name.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. ...
2024-10-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jane Dew, Cayman Islands.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DropCatch.com LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2020-04-27 - Case Details
Respondent is ofir klein, United States, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-01-22 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
2.1 The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...There is also no evidence before the Panel to the contrary.
6.9 There is no right or legitimate interest in holding a domain name for such a purpose and the use of a domain name in this manner is use in bad faith (see for example, Vestey Group Limited v. ...
2019-04-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Steve Ryan, Florida Chem, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with SRS AB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the BECHTEL mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the
disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-11-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Orlandsentinel-Com-Dom, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with iHoldings.com
Inc. d/b/a DotRegistrar.com.
3. ...Parties’ Contentions
In order to make its case for transfer of a domain name, Complainant must prove three elements:
(i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and
(ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and
(iii) Respondent’s domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2005-05-18 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaints satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Disregarding the gTLD as a necessary element of a domain name, each of the Domain Names is confusingly
similar to the CANVA Mark as each domain name reproduces the CANVA mark along with one or more
words. ...
2023-05-01 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Factual Background
The Complainant owns and operates the website at the domain name , registered on
October 1, 1996, and has used it in connection with the manufacture and retail of beauty and cosmetic
products under the name “THE BODY SHOP”. ...
2025-08-11 - Case Details
Allocation Network GmbH v. Steve Gregory, WIPO Domain Name Dispute Case D2000-0016, Shirmax Retail Ltd. v. CES Marketing Group, Inc., eResolution Domain Name Dispute Case AF-0104.
...Reverse Domain Name Hijacking is defined in paragraph 1 of the Rules as meaning "using the Policy in bad faith to attempt to deprive a registered domain name holder of a domain name."
...
2000-11-30 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Additionally, the Panel also finds that the Respondent has clearly been engaged in a pattern of trademark-
abusive domain name registrations. In this regard, the Panel refers to the Complainant’s evidence from
which it appears that the Respondent has been involved as a respondent in no less than 19 prior procedures
under the Policy, where the respective panels have found that the Respondent had registered and used the
respective domain names in bad faith, see for instance: Antonio Lupi Design S.p.A. v. ...
2024-11-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is 冉茂明 (Mao Ming Ran), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with West263 International
Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The fact that the Domain Name resolves to an inactive
website is not bona fide or legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Domain Name.
...
2022-05-10 - Case Details
Respondent is David Jentz, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...On May 10, 2012, Respondent registered the Domain Name at issue in this case, namely, .
The Domain Name, at the time of filing the Complaint, resolved to an inactive website. ...
2021-12-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Charlie Brennan, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gransy, s.r.o. ...This
test typically involves a side-by-side comparison of the domain name and the textual components of the
relevant trademark to assess whether the mark is recognizable within the domain name.
...
2023-06-23 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...A respondent may seek to demonstrate rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name by pointing to, “before any notice to [the respondent] of the dispute, [its] use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the domain name or a name corresponding to the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services.”
...
2018-05-23 - Case Details
Furthermore, so far as the Complainants are aware the Respondent has
not (i) used the disputed domain name or any name corresponding to the disputed domain name in
page 3
connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services, (ii) been commonly known by the disputed domain
name or (iii) made any legitimate non-commercial or fair use of the disputed domain name.
...KG, Aldi Stores Limited v. Jennifer Scalzo, Jennifer Scalzo
Case No. D2025-0533
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2025-04-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Davis Lopez, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Wix.com Ltd. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-12-02 - Case Details