The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Regarding the remaining disputed domain names, , and , whilst they are not in active use their holding, in the context of the bad faith use of the disputed domain name constitutes passive holding and bad faith use and registration in the sense in which that expression is used in Telstra Corporation v. ...
2015-03-30 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name the subject of the dispute is .
The Registrar with which the domain name is registered is TotalNic.net, care of Capital Networks Pty Ltd, PO Box 383, Dickson, ACT 2905, Australia. ...The third ground requires the Complainant to establish that the domain name has been registered and is being used by the Respondent in bad faith. In respect of clause (iii) both of these heads must be made out – see Telstra Corp Ltd v Nuclear Marshmallows, Case D2000-0003.
...
2001-04-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Gerard Chassan of Chalon sur Saone, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with 1&1 Internet SE (the “Registrar”).
3. ...It has not been authorized by the Complainant to register or use the Disputed Domain Name or to seek the registration of any domain name incorporating the SOFINCO Mark. There is no evidence that the Respondent is commonly known by the Disputed Domain Name or any similar name. ...
2018-12-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Janice Park, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verif ied that the Complaint together with the Amended Complaint satisf ied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-11-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Guiying5 Hong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...In cases where a
domain name incorporates the entirety of a trademark, or where at least a dominant feature of the relevant
mark is recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar
to that mark for purposes of UDRP standing.
...
2023-07-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Lucy Efrem, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent’s failure to respond to the Complainant’s contentions and to provide any explanation of good faith use of the Disputed Domain Name may also be considered an indication of bad faith; see e.g., News Group Newspapers Limited and News Network Limited v. ...
2020-07-09 - Case Details
Respondent is Mahesh Gurunathan, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Respondent, according to the disclosed WhoIs information for the disputed domain name, is a resident of
India who registered the disputed domain name on April 24, 2023. The disputed domain name resolves to a
typical parking website provided by the Registrar, indicating that the disputed domain name “is registered,
but may still be available”.
...
2024-01-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is morgan sarah, Holland Broadbridge, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo, LLC
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...It has not been authorized by the
Complainant to register or use the Domain Name or to seek the registration of any domain name
incorporating the BLOCKFI Mark or a mark similar to the BLOCKFI Mark. ...
2023-02-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Connect Systems / Hostonik.com Web Hosting, of Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, internally represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...The Complainant cites Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003, and other decisions articulating the “passive holding” doctrine that bad faith can be found in some circumstances even if the domain name has not yet been put to use.
...
2018-04-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Executive Products Ltd. with an address at County Meath, Ireland.
2. The Domain Name(s) and Registrar(s)
The domain names at issue in these proceedings are "guinnesspubs.com", "guinnesspubs.net" and "guinnesspubs.org". ...The question has however been canvassed in other administrative proceedings and in the courts of other jurisdictions.
In Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Walsucks and Walmarket Puerto Rico WIPO case D2000-0477 the question of confusing similarity was considered in the following terms:
"The question whether a domain name and a trademark are confusingly similar involves the application of a multifactored test exemplified in the decision of the U.S. ...
2001-03-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Name Redacted.1
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a
Registrar.eu. ...The domain name has been registered by the Complainant since 1997.
The disputed domain name was registered on September 3, 2023.
...
2024-01-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Hydra Computer Ltd / Federico Roccetti, Valletta, Republic of Malta.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Key-Systems GmbH dba domaindiscount24.com.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2008-09-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Didi Nurrohman of Depok, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2012-12-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tung Trương, 33086406860, Viet Nam.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Leppink
Sole Panelist
Date: March 22, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Alain Afflelou Franchiseur v. Tung Trương, 33086406860
Case No. D2024-0499
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-03-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jesse Pui, Ethinkmedia, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. (Name.com LLC) (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-04-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Yousaf Nadeem, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Squarespace Domains LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...It is also well established that the
generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”), such as “.com,” in a disputed domain name is disregarded.
The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. ...
2023-12-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Michel Sternbuch, United Kingdom (“UK”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with IONOS SE (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the entirety of the mark is reproduced within the Domain Name. The addition of a hyphen
does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity between the Domain Name and the mark for the purposes
of the Policy, since the mark is readily recognizable within the Domain Name. ...
2024-02-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Gottlieb Nahormek, United States of America (“US”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the Trade Mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the Trade Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-10-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jerry Anderson, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-07-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Darius Buenconsejo, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that it has satisfied each of the elements required under the Policy for a transfer
of the disputed domain name.
Notably, the Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its Mark because
the disputed domain name replicates the Mark. ...
2025-12-18 - Case Details