The Respondent is not represented in these proceedings.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Key-Systems GmbH dba domaindiscount24.com.
3. ...The Domain Name incorporates the complete trademark, only adding the generic domain extension “.mobi”. Therefore, the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trademarks.
...
2008-05-28 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...According to paragraph 4(c) of the Policy the following circumstances, if proved, demonstrate a respondent’s rights or legitimate interests in a domain name:
(i) respondent used or demonstrably prepared to use the domain name or corresponding name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services prior to notice of the dispute; or
(ii) respondent (as an individual, business, or other organization) has been commonly known by the domain name, even if it has not acquired trademark rights; or
(iii) respondent is making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name, without intent for commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers or to tarnish the complainant’s marks.
...
2011-08-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Md Nurun Nabie, United Arab Emirates.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verif ied that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisf ied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-05-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Admin, Whois Privacy Corp., Bahamas / roberto vaccarella, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Internet Domain Service BS Corp (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent does not appear to make any legitimate noncommercial or fair
use of the disputed domain name, nor any use in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services.
In fact, the disputed domain name redirects to the website of a domain name broker where the disputed
domain name is offered for sale. ...
2022-07-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Laurent Guerson, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a
Registrar.eu. ...As to the use of the disputed domain name in bad faith, as previously mentioned, at the time of filing of the
Complaint, the disputed domain name resolved to a parking page. ...
2022-05-13 - Case Details
Respondent is Benson and Partner Ltd of Houston, Texas, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with SIDN through webagentur.at internet services gmbh.
3. ...The website connected to the Domain Name is a pay per click site which according to Complainant further indicates the lack of legitimate interest of Respondent in the Domain Name. ...
2011-03-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Gary Brooks, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NetEarth One Inc. d/b/a NetEarth (the “Registrar”).
3. ...There are no rights or legitimate interests held by the Respondent in respect of the Domain Name. The Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name nor does the Respondent have any authorization from the Complainant to register the Domain Name. ...
2021-04-14 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...A gTLD, in this case “.com”, may be ignored when assessing the confusing similarity between a trademark and a domain name since it is a technical registration requirement (see, e.g., VAT Holding AG v. Vat.com,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-12-11 - Case Details
Group One Holdings Pte Ltd v. Steven Hafto
WIPO Case No. D2017-0183.
Generally speaking, a finding that a domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith
requires an inference to be drawn that the Respondent in question has registered and is using the disputed
domain name to take advantage of its significance as a trademark owned by (usually) the Complainant.
...ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Paybook Inc v. Chr S., Lakerock
Case No. DAI2026-0015
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2026-04-08 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint, together with the amended Complaint, satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant’s corporate website allows customers to book travel reservations around the world, change or cancel travel reservations, check in for flights, and view flight status.
The disputed domain name (disputed domain name number 1) was registered on November 13, 2020; the disputed domain names and (disputed domain names numbers 2 and 3, respectively) were registered on October 5, 2020; the disputed domain name (disputed domain name number 4) was registered on September 7, 2020; the disputed domain name (disputed domain name number 5) was registered on April 12, 2019; the disputed domain name (disputed domain name number 6) was registered on July 16, 2019; and, the disputed domain name (disputed domain name number 7) was registered on January 12, 2019.
...
2021-03-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Danila Tonkikh, Russian Federation, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Registrar of Domain Names REG.RU LLC
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
/Assen Alexiev/
Assen Alexiev
Sole Panelist
Date: November 19, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Vusiongroup v. ...
2025-11-21 - Case Details
The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name , because Respondent does not use the domain name as a trademark, or in any other manner than as a domain name. ...The Respondent has every right and legitimate use in respect to the domain name .
The domain name was acquired for the benefit of Respondent’s daughter who’s first name is Carli – a name which is becoming a popular name.
...
2006-10-23 - Case Details
Complainant
stresses, with reference to Dolce & Gabbana S.p.A v. Victory, WIPO
Case No. D2001-1174 that a trademark in a domain name dispute may also be
an unregistered or common law trademark.
...Furthermore, Complainant alleges that Respondent is not using the <2e.com>
domain, as the website is blank and the only interest of Respondent is to sell
the domain name. In similar circumstances, a WIPO Panel in Experian Information
Solutions, Inc v. ...
2003-04-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is tian tan, Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Porkbun LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-12-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Francisco Perez, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CloudFlare, Inc. ...The Complainant operates its primary business website at the domain name .
The disputed domain name was registered on December 1, 2023. ...
2024-03-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jefe Jefe, US.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Zadra-Symes
Sole Panelist
Date: January 21, 2025
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Empower Clinic Services, L.L.C., d/b/a Empower Pharmacy v. Jefe Jefe
Case No. D2024-4890
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-01-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ryan Dunn, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Using a domain name which includes a trademark to redirect to a website that competes with the trademark
owner is not bona fide use of the domain name.
...
2024-05-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Christian Sampson, Spain.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Sea Wasp, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. .../Jeremy Speres/
Jeremy Speres
Sole Panelist
Date: July 23, 2025
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Farmbot Holdings Pty Ltd v. Christian Sampson
Case No. D2025-2145
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-07-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is adam three, OWN, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-07-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Rio Hardina Putra of Audify, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the Trade Mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is identical to the Trade Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-07-08 - Case Details