The Respondent is Dean Purvis, Creative Tinder, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Domain Name”) is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The Panel finds the Domain Name confusingly similar to the Trademark. The Trademark is clearly
recognizable in the Domain Name. ...
2023-03-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is 杨智超 (Zhichao Yang), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd. d/b/a HiChina
(www.net.cn) (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel also notes that the disputed domain name is almost identical to the Complainants’ domain name
, and the Respondent has been the respondent in over 100 domain name proceedings.
...
2022-07-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Deng Qingguo, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...There is no information that the Respondent is trading under any
company name corresponding to the disputed domain name or that it has any other legal rights to the name.
The Respondent has not used the disputed domain name for any bona fide or fair purpose. ...
2025-07-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Cristina Aparecida de Faria Mazzini, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-07-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Crown Intercontinental Holidays, Crown Intercontinental Holidays Pvt Ltd, India, self-
represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with
GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...There is no evidence that the
Respondent has registered the Domain Name as a trademark or acquired trademark rights. There is no
evidence of the Respondent’s use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the Domain Name or a name
corresponding to the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. ...
2026-01-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Veronica Julius, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name SRS AB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...While the disputed domain name does not resolve to an active website, DNS records show active
MX entries, indicating that the disputed domain name is configured for email services. ...
2026-01-08 - Case Details
Respondent is Tao Jing, Afghanistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
Complainant requests that the disputed domain name be transferred to it.
...
2026-01-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is xiaodong liu, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-11-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is ÿ¹ÿ¿ÿ¿ ÿ¿ÿ¿ÿªÿ¿ÿ¿ÿ¿, ÿ¹ÿ¿ÿ¿ ÿ¿ÿ¿ÿªÿ¿ÿ¿ÿ¿ , Iran (Islamic Republic of).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...According to the Complainant, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name given that:
(i) the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name;
(ii) the Respondent is not affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way, not carrying out any activity for, nor having any business with it;
(iii) no license or authorization has been granted to the Respondent to make any use of the Complainant’s trademark, or to apply for the registration of the disputed domain name;
(iv) the Respondent is displaying the Complainant’s trademark, logo and products at the website that resolves from the disputed domain name seeking to create an association with the Complainant and to trade off the Complainant’s goodwill; and
(v) the Respondent is not making a bona fide offering of goods or services under the Policy or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name given that the disputed domain name does not disclose to Internet users that there is no commercial connection between the Complainant and the Respondent.
...
2020-07-09 - Case Details
The Center verif ied that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisf ied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Complainant alleges that it has controlled the domain name since May 2, 2004, used for a
website through which Complainant’s goods and services are of fered. ...
2024-11-04 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Finally, the Complainant notes that the panel in London Stock Exchange Plc. v. Timothy Golovin, Golovins Consulting Firm LLC,
WIPO Case No. D2021-2176found that the very similar domain name (“.com” being the only difference) had been registered and used in bad faith.
...
2022-03-01 - Case Details
The disputed domain name registrants did not comment on the Complainant’s request.
Paragraph 3(c) of the Rules states that a complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that
the domain names are registered by the same domain name holder.
...name+number@gmail.com); (iv) none of the disputed domain names was associated with an active website
at the date of the Complaint; (v) one of the domain name registrants is allegedly residing in Türkiye, and one
of the domain names held by the other registrant includes “tr” in the domain name composition, which stands
for Türkiye. ...
2025-08-19 - Case Details
A mere registration of a domain name does not give the owner a right or a legitimate interest in the domain name itself (Terroni Inc. v. ...There is no doubt that the Respondent has registered the disputed domain names with full knowledge of the Complainant’s rights in the LPG trademarks. Previous UDRP decisions have found bad faith in a case the disputed domain name was registered where the respondent knew or should have known of the registration and use of the trademark prior to registering the disputed domain name (Philip Morris USA Inc. v. ...
2016-05-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Whois Agent, Whois Privacy Protection Service of Xiamen, Fujian, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Bizcn.com, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2014-06-11 - Case Details
Respondents are Whoisguard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc., Panama / Domain Admin, Whois Privacy Corp., Bahamas and Tree Inc, United States.
2. The Domain Names and Registrars
The disputed domain name is registered with Internet Domain Service BS Corp and the disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...See also BTWN Exhibits, LLC v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Ahmed Fawzy, ASM Marketing,
WIPO Case No. D2020-0036 (“[t]he use of the Domain Name for an illegal activity such as constructing an email composition containing the Domain Name for deceiving purposes can never confer rights or legitimate interests on Respondent”).
...
2020-12-22 - Case Details
The Center has verified that the Complaint satisfies the formal requirements of the ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). ...In Bloomberg L.P. v Baltic Consultants Ltd., FA 95834 Nat. Arb. Forum, (November 20, 2000) the respondent's domain name was found to be confusingly similar to Complainant's trademark "Bloomberg".
...
2002-08-16 - Case Details
Respondent is Domain Administrator, Fundacion Privacy Services LTD, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Media Elite Holdings
Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Sole Panelist
Date: October 24, 2025
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Northern Trust Corporation v. Domain Administrator, Fundacion Privacy Services LTD
Case No. D2025-3390
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2025-10-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is Evgen Shirko of Kiev, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Moniker Online Services, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...In support of the first ground, the Complainant submits that the disputed domain name incorporates its trademark and prefixes the generic term “overthecounter.” Referring to Adobe Systems Incorporated v. ...
2013-03-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Idah Idah, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...All these dates clearly predate the registration of
the disputed domain name.
The disputed domain name was registered on March 25, 2025, and redirects to an official
website owned by the Complainant at the domain name .
5. ...
2025-08-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Denis Prohorov, Paraguay.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a
Registrar.eu. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-08-29 - Case Details