About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 58508   document(s)s (0.114 sec)

Rows

<<  <  37401 - 37420  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-0116 for hersheyscn.com pdf (194 KB)

The Respondent is 吴小鹏 (xiaopeng wu), China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with West263 International Limited (the “Registrar”). 3. ...As the HERSHEY’S trademark is recognizable within the disputed domain name, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. The addition of “cn” into the disputed domain name does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity. ...

2025-03-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-2697 for vspvisionjobs.com pdf (142 KB)

Respondent is bush auto, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-09-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-3147 for virginshomes.com pdf (137 KB)

The Respondent is Jude Ogbonna, Nigeria. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The addition of letter “S” within the disputed domain name does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity, as the marks remain recognizable within the disputed domain name. ...

2024-09-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-1554 for bungesupply.com pdf (137 KB)

The Respondent is Kimberly Bass, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Maier Sole Panelist Date: June 7, 2024 ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Bunge SA v. Kimberly Bass Case No. D2024-1554 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 4. ...

2024-06-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-1673 for niprodiabetes.com pdf (164 KB)

The Respondent is Brock Jake, Afghanistan. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on January 19, 2024. The disputed domain name in turn directs to a website with some gambling-related contents in simplified Chinese. 5. ...

2024-06-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-1817 for careercaesars.com html (13 KB)

Respondent is WhoisSecure, United States / Ehiz Ludda, Ehiz IT Consultant, Nigeria.1 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with OwnRegistrar, Inc. ...The disputed domain name incorporates Complainant’s CAESARS trademark in its entirety. Numerous UDRP panels have recognized that incorporating a trademark in its entirety can be sufficient to establish that the disputed domain name is at least confusingly similar to a registered trademark (see e.g., PepsiCo, Inc. v. ...

2019-09-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DNL2018-0047 for fentybeautyshop.nl html (12 KB)

The Respondent is Privacy Protection Service INC d/b/a PrivacyProtect.org of Mumbai, India / Cathusia Orna of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the Domain Name”) is registered with SIDN through PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com. 3. ...Based on the evidence and the undisputed submissions of the Complainant, the Panel concludes that the Respondent has not received the Complainant’s consent to use the Trade Marks as part of the Domain Name, is not commonly known by the Domain Name, has no connection or affiliation with the Complainant and has not acquired trade mark rights in the Domain Name. ...

2018-10-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-0979 for tetra-packaging.com pdf (155 KB)

The Respondent is David Chin, DEVI PACKAGE, United States of America. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2025-05-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2527 for careers-constellationenergy.com pdf (158 KB)

Respondent is leblanc mcdonnell, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Complainant Complainant contends that (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademarks, (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and (iii) Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. ...

2025-08-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-1557 for sanofiinc.com pdf (142 KB)

The Respondent is Barnes Rob, Kenya. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the Disputed Domain Name. Accordingly, the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-06-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0927 for breadfynancial.com pdf (159 KB)

The Respondent is Aldin Nicevic, Aldin Nicevic, United Kingdom. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Domain.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-04-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0923 for wwwamerisure.com pdf (224 KB)

The Respondent is Guiying Huang, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”). 3. ...It is registration and use in bad faith of the disputed domain name. Passive holding of a domain name containing a mark with a reputation may confirm the bad faith use. ...

2024-04-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2025-0094 for instamod.co pdf (171 KB)

Respondent is Mytoolz net, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with CloudFlare, Inc. ...Complainant Complainant contends that (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainants’ trademarks, (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and (iii) Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. ...

2026-01-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2324 for romandglobal-en.com pdf (138 KB)

The Respondent is Jong Seo Hwang, romandglobal_en, Republic of Korea. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. ...The entirety of the Complainant’s ROMAND mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-08-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-3364 for haleon.top pdf (163 KB)

Respondent The Respondent is an individual located in China. C. The Disputed Domain Name The disputed domain name was registered on July 3, 2024. D. Use of the Disputed Domain Name The disputed domain name has not been used in respect of any active website. 5. ...Hughes Sole Panelist Date: October 9, 2024 https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/ ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Haleon UK IP Limited v. 黄涛 (Huang Tao) Case No. D2024-3364 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 4. ...

2024-10-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1855 for grabrental.com, grabtaxi.me, mygrabcar.com, mytaxigrab.com, sggrabcar.com, teksigrab.com html (23 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). ...The disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant's trademark GRABTAXI. The disputed domain name is essentially an anagram of GRABTAXI with the prefix "my", which may pertain to either "Malaysia" or "mine". ...

2016-11-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1637 for thelumineers2022.com pdf (184 KB)

The Respondent is Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot, United States / Andrey Weprikov, Ukraine. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. According to it, by using the disputed domain name, the Respondent has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to the website at the disputed domain name by creating a likelihood of confusion with the THE LUMINEERS trademark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, and endorsement of the website under the disputed domain name. ...

2022-10-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-4681 for zaswin.com pdf (209 KB)

The Respondent is Weiping Zheng, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. (the “Registrar”). 3. .../Kaya Köklü/ Kaya Köklü Sole Panelist Date: January 6, 2026 https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/ ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Bancolombia S.A. v. Weiping Zheng Case No. D2025-4681 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 4. ...

2026-01-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2014-0035 for clarins.co html (13 KB)

Respondent is Tarkan Guler of Istanbul, Turkey. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the "Registrar"). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). ...

2015-01-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0456 for whatsappstatusviews.com html (13 KB)

Respondent is Siva Prasad Reddy, India. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Wix.com Ltd. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2022-04-27 - Case Details