The Respondent is Mark Stone, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the
disputed domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-01-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mr Brian, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered many years after
the Complainant’s trademarks were registered. In addition, the disputed domain name is very similar to the
Complainant’s domain name , registered in 2004 by the Complainant and in use since
then. ...
2024-04-24 - Case Details
Respondent is Lu Ni La, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Gname.com Pte.
...The Panel finds the Mark is recognizable within the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Domain Name is
confusingly similar to the Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-03-17 - Case Details
Respondent is Kai Xiao, Ji Su Ke Ji, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
Complainant requests that the disputed domain name be transferred to it.
...
2025-11-19 - Case Details
Respondent is Malcome Gana, Calson Media Space, US.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-07-29 - Case Details
Respondent is ABEL TOURE, Côte d'Ivoire.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Respondent, according to the disclosed WhoIs information for the disputed domain name, is a resident of the Ivory Coast who registered the disputed domain name on January 31, 2020. ...
2020-08-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sergei Tim, Sono RC LP of Edinburgh, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ("UK"), represented by The Trademark Company, PLLC, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name, (the "Domain Name"), is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...When the Complaint was filed those services were being provided through a website connected to the Domain Name, but currently the Domain Name redirects to a website connected to the domain name, , and the services are branded "GoDateNow".
...
2016-01-26 - Case Details
The Respondents are Mustafa Sonmez, France, and Alain Barbier, France.
2. The Domain Names and Registrars
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com.
...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-12-19 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
Paragraph 4(b) of the Policy sets out examples of circumstances that will be considered by a panel to be evidence of bad faith registration and use of a domain name. It provides that:
“For the purposes of Paragraph 4(a)(iii), the following circumstances, in particular but without limitation, if found by the Panel to be present, shall be evidence of the registration and use of a domain name in bad faith:
(i) circumstances indicating that you have registered or you have acquired the domain name primarily for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the domain name registration to the complainant who is the owner of the trademark or service mark or to a competitor of that complainant, for valuable consideration in excess of your documented out-of-pocket costs directly related to the domain name; or
(ii) you have registered the domain name in order to prevent the owner of the trademark or service mark from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name, provided that you have engaged in a pattern of such conduct; or
(iii) you have registered the domain name primarily for the purpose of disrupting the business of a competitor; or
(iv) by using the domain name, you have intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to your web site or other on-line location, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the complainant's mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of your web site or location or of a product or service on your web site or location.”
...
2021-10-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is DEE Genesis, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name. There is not any evidence of the
Respondent’s use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the Domain Name or a name corresponding to
the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. ...
2022-05-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Paulo Victor Meneghel da Silva, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Da Cunha Ferreira
Sole Panelist
Date: August 27, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Sanofi v. Paulo Victor Meneghel da Silva
Case No. D2024-2265
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-09-24 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The first disputed domain name resolved to a parked page with pay-per-click (“PPC”) sponsored links related to the Complainant’s activities, whereas the second disputed domain name does not resolve to an active webpage and the last disputed domain name is used in connection with a webpage used in connection with a scam attempt that promises free coupons depicting the Complainant’s trademark.
5. ...
2020-08-03 - Case Details
The “www.attractive.com.au” site to which Domain Name resolves to also contains the opportunity to make inquiries about the purchase of the Domain Name.
5. ...It owns a trade mark registration for the TASER Mark in Australia.
The Domain Name is identical to the TASER Mark, and the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the TASER Mark.
...
2013-07-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Behzat Cemal AKGÜN of Istanbul, Turkey.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name115, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2014-08-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is 北京外思特科技有限公司 (bei jing wai si te ke ji you xian gong si), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
...Hughes
Sole Panelist
Dated: October 21, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
F5, Inc., f/k/a F5 Networks, Inc. (F5有限公司, 曾用名F5网络公司) v. 北京外思特科技有限公司 (bei jing wai si te ke ji you xian gong si)
Case No. D2022-3178
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2022-10-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is YangZhiChao, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 22net, Inc. ...Hughes
Sole Panelist
Dated: May 24, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Blackbaud, Inc. v. YangZhiChao
Case No. D2022-1059
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History...
2022-05-27 - Case Details
Respondent is weev seez, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...- Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name:
- The disputed domain name was created nine years after Complainant created its
domain name...
2024-01-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is sharma hornessd, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-10-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is John Khaled, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-06-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Enrico Ruggerone, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-10-15 - Case Details