The Respondent is Ramaswamy Sreenivasan of San Jose, California, United States of America ("United States"), self represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Domain.com, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...It is therefore unlikely that a respondent ignorant of the existence of the complainant and its trademark could be said to have registered the domain name in question in bad faith (see the discussion in Kalahari, A Division Of Nasboek Ltd. (Sa) v. ...
2016-08-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is jan jilek, Croatia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 1API GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...KG v. jan jilek
Case No. DAI2024-0040
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-07-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Dipendra, Dealsnsteals, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with BigRock Solutions Pvt Ltd. ...Furthermore, the Complainant submits that the Respondent cannot credibly claim to be commonly known by the Domain Name, or a name corresponding to the Domain Name, as the name of the Respondent shows no resemblance to the Domain Name, while the Complainant is not aware of any evidence that the Respondent has sought to secure any trade mark rights in the terms “whatsapp” or “whatsappsell”, as reflected in the Domain Name.
...
2020-11-05 - Case Details
Respondent is Dieter Spreidler, ETS, Germany, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Mesh Digital Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Respondent confirms to have offered Complainant to sell the disputed domain name for a normal and fair price that is typically for a domain name of interest, however, only as Complainant was asking the disputed domain name for itself. ...
2020-12-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Service Provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Akbar Ali Khan, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The specific Top Level Domain associated with the disputed domain
name is not relevant. Furthermore, the BAYER Trademark is entirely recognizable within the disputed
domain name. ...
2022-05-16 - Case Details
Respondent is Robert Heck, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...Respondent does not deny that the ownership of the Domain Name changed many times, and Respondent
does not claim that he was the original registrant of the Domain Name. ...
2022-05-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is alain denalie, Belgium.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Key-Systems GmbH (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent is not known under the disputed domain name and the disputed domain name is not being
used for a bona fide offering of goods or services; rather the disputed domain name is passively held by the
Respondent which does not establish legitimate rights in the disputed domain name.
...
2025-02-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Admin, Whoisprotection.cc, Malaysia / Numaniya Numaniya, Bangladesh.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Web
Commerce Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. .../Wolter Wefers Bettink/
Wolter Wefers Bettink
Sole Panelist
Date: March 15, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Fenix International Limited v. Domain Admin, Whoisprotection.cc / Numaniya Numaniya
Case No. D2022-0275
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2022-03-24 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Semantix Språkcentrum AB v. Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc.
Case No. D2024-3897
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Semantix Språkcentrum AB, Sweden, represented by Abion AB, Sweden.
The Respondent is Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc., Cyprus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Communigal Communications Ltd. ...
2024-11-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Corporate Brand Protection, DNS Admin, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant notes that the disputed domain name is not used for a bona fide
offering of goods or services; the disputed domain name only redirected users to a website where the
disputed domain name was offered for sale.
...
2024-01-29 - Case Details
In cases where a domain name incorporates the entirety of a trademark, or where at least a dominant feature of the relevant mark is recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of UDRP standing.
...The disputed domain name resolves to a landing webpage where it is mentioned that the disputed domain name is for sale, which is an indication that the Respondent passively holds the disputed domain name aiming at a potential commercial gain.
...
2022-03-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Q itgration, Thomas Felczac, AB of Göteborg, Sweden.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, Inc.
3. ...See Speedo Holdings B.V. v. Programmer, Miss Kathy Beckerson, John Smitt, Matthew Simmons,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0281.
In the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions (“WIPO Overview”), paragraph 3.1, consensus view, it has been stated that when a domain name is registered before a trademark right is established, the registration of the domain name was not in bad faith because the registrant could not have contemplated the complainant's non-existent right.
...
2010-08-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Protect, LLC (PrivacyProtect.org), United States of America (“United States”) /
I.C.M., United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd.
...There are no rights or legitimate interests held by the Respondent in respect of the Domain Name. The
Respondent is not commonly known as the Domain Name nor has the Complainant provided a licence or
authorization to register the Domain Name or any domain name incorporating the HOCHTIEF Mark. ...
2022-10-19 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...See B & H Foto & Electronics Corp. v. Domains by Proxy, Inc. / Joseph Gross,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0842.
In the instant proceeding, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's VERITAS mark as it incorporates the VERITAS mark in its entirety at the head of the disputed domain name. ...
2018-06-28 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Rights or Legitimate Interests
Pursuant to paragraph 4(c) of the Policy, a respondent may establish rights to or legitimate interests in a
domain name by demonstrating any of the following:
(i) before any notice to it of the dispute, respondent’s use of, or demonstrable preparations to use the
domain name or a name corresponding to the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of
goods or services; or
(ii) respondent has been commonly known by the domain name, even if it has acquired no trademark or
service mark rights; or
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 4
(iii) respondent is making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name, without intent for
commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers or to tarnish the trademark or service mark at issue.
...
2023-02-27 - Case Details
Ltd., Australia, self-represented.
2. The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names (first disputed domain name) and
(second disputed domain name) are registered with Netregistry Wholesale Pty Ltd (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...On May 27, 2019, the Respondent registered the business name Tea Gardens Ferry.
The first disputed domain name was registered on May 27, 2019. The second disputed domain name was
registered on April 16, 2023.
...
2023-09-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Eleanor Hanson, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Paknic (Private) Limited (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-05-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Albert Poussin, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Register SPA (the “Registrar”).
3. ...https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
ELO v. Albert Poussin
Case No. D2025-3638
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-10-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is iverson lim, Cambodia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
NameCheap, Inc. ...The Panel finds that the Complainant has registered rights in the mark SKYSCANNER. The Panel further
finds that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to this mark, since the mere addition of the
generic Top-Level-Domain (“gTLD”) to the Disputed Domain Name does not negate the confusing similarity,
neither does the addition of the prefix “mobil” to the Disputed Domain Name.
...
2025-07-03 - Case Details
Respondent is Merilynn Rupp, USA.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Web Commerce
Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the Mark is recognizable within the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Domain Name is
confusingly similar to the Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-04-03 - Case Details