The Domain Name and Registrar
2.1 The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with Tucows Inc. ...It is an issue that the Panel attempted to explore in Johnson & Johnson v. Ebubekir Ozdogan,
WIPO Case No. D2015-1031. That was not a case which involved a criticism site, but the same issues arose of when an addition to a trade mark in a domain name meant that the domain name no longer impermissibly impersonated the trade mark owner.
6.13 So far as the present case is concerned, the Panel has reached the conclusion that the Domain Name is on the wrong side of the line. ...
2018-01-30 - Case Details
In other words, it is important to ensure fairness to the parties and the maintenance of an inexpensive and expeditious avenue for resolving domain name disputes. (Whirlpool Corporation, Whirlpool Properties, Inc. v. Hui'erpu (HK) electrical appliance co. ltd.,
WIPO Case No. ...Thus, the consensus view is that paragraph 4(c) shifts the burden of production to the respondent to come forward with evidence of a right or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name, once the complainant has made a prima facie showing. See, e.g., Document Technologies, Inc. v. ...
2018-05-04 - Case Details
Respondent is Chunmei Tang, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Name.com,
Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-07-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is nan yangmaoyi of Lijiang, Yunnan, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Shanghai Yovole Networks, Inc. ...Registration of the Disputed Domain Name prevents the Complainant from reflecting their mark in a corresponding domain name. The Respondent is not offering a bona fide offering of goods or services with the Disputed Domain Name. ...
2013-07-04 - Case Details
Respondent is Wang Hualin of Beijin, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 1API GmbH (the "Registrar").
3. ...The disputed domain name incorporates the BREITLING trademark in its entirety. Numerous UDRP panels have recognized that incorporating a trademark in its entirety can be sufficient to establish that the disputed domain name is at least confusingly similar to a registered trademark (see e.g., PepsiCo, Inc. v. ...
2018-02-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ana Velaz, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Disputed Domain Name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant has not authorized, licensed, or permitted the Respondent to register or use the Disputed Domain Name or to use the trademark in the Disputed Domain Name. Furthermore, the Respondent is not known by the Disputed Domain Name.
...
2020-09-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / maggi numi, United States
of America (hereinafter “United States or USA”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (‘the Domain Name’) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Further the Domain Name differs by only one letter from the domain name owned by the Complainant and,
therefore, appears to be a typosquatting registration. ...
2022-10-10 - Case Details
Respondent is xiao qi, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...Here, the disputed domain name is clearly based on Complainant’s SAFARILAND mark, albeit with the
non-distinguishing additional letter “j” at the tail of the disputed domain name. ...
2025-06-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Faisal Anwar, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...The Respondent has never been authorized by the Complainant to register a domain name similar to its
trademark registrations or company name. The Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain
name and has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name.
...
2026-02-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is J. Almeida, Porto, Portugal.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Fushi Tarazu,
Incorporated.
3. ...The domain name under dispute is simply redirected to a domain name registration service provider website. ...
2005-04-26 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant request as a remedy the transfer of the domain names and and the cancellation of the domain name .
...
2012-12-05 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...On or after these registration dates, the Respondent came into possession of the disputed domain names. All disputed domain names resolve to a domain name parking platform, which provides various advertising links.
5. ...
2021-06-23 - Case Details
An example is Mozilla Foundation and Mozilla Corporation v. Limpkin Walker,
WIPO Case No. DME2008-0007, in which it was stated: “the addition of the ccTLD “.me” is without legal significance from the standpoint of comparing the Domain Name to the [trademark] because use of a ccTLD (or gTLD) is required of domain name registrants, “.me” is one of only a few such ccTLD's, and “.me” does not serve to identify a specific enterprise as a source of goods or services”.
...Thus, it is this Panel's view that a determination of identicalness and similarity of a .me domain name may in appropriate cases be based on a consideration of the domain name as a whole – that is, of the domain name including the “.me” suffix.
...
2009-11-16 - Case Details
C. The Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name was registered on August 22, 2023.
D. Use of the Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name is alleged to have been inactive at the time of filing of the Complaint. ...To the contrary, the disputed domain name has
not been used. Furthermore, the Respondent has offered the disputed domain name for sale, via the
domain name brokerage website hosted by GoDaddy.com, LLC.
...
2025-12-19 - Case Details
Respondent is Jaxxon & Company, Inc., d/b/a Jaxxon Watches, U.S. / Brent Lofton, U.S.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com,
LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Domain Name was registered on August 3, 2020. The Domain Name resolves to a website at which
Respondent offers for sale Jaxxon watches. ...
2022-05-06 - Case Details
Respondent is Borso hoev, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-11-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is walteru walterur / asdasd, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Domain Name incorporates the T-MOBILE Mark in its entirety with the minor addition “ip”. The addition of the abbreviation ‘ip” to a complainant’s mark does not prevent the confusing similarity, see Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ...
2021-06-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is John Green, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Eranet International Limited (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-05-18 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...All the Domain Names were registered on January
23, 2025, except for Domain Name which was registered on February 14, 2025.
...
2025-07-10 - Case Details
Respondent is Tonya Morris, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Oosterbaan
Sole Panelist
Date: July 1, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Haulotte Group v. Tonya Morris
Case No. D2025-2021
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
A. ...
2025-07-07 - Case Details