According to the publicly available WhoIs information, the first Respondent, Nigel Varley, is the “Registrant Contact Name” and the “Tech Contact Name” for the disputed domain name. The second Respondent, CAD Australia Pty Limited, is the “Registrant” of the disputed domain name. ...According to the publicly available WhoIs information, the “Registrant” for the domain name is the second Respondent and the “Registrant Contact Name” and the “Tech Contact Name” for the domain name is the first Respondent.
5. ...
2011-04-14 - Case Details
The Respondents are Naeem Ahmad, India and Mytoolz net, United States.
2. The Domain Names and Registrars
The disputed domain name is registered with CloudFlare, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-07-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Cornelius Simeon,
Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name, , be transferred to the Complainant.
/Adam Taylor/
Adam Taylor
Sole Panelist
Date: April 18, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Moelis & Company v. ...
2022-04-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is LaPorte Holdings, Inc., Los Angeles, California, United States
of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”)
is registered with NameKing.com.
3. ...Since registering the Domain Name, Respondent has
directed the Domain Name to a search engine and portal located at “www.searchportal.information.com”.
...
2006-04-06 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-10-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is drew tenski, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2026-01-06 - Case Details
Respondent is Jai Shan, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with TurnCommerce, Inc. ...The Panel finds that Respondent has demonstrated bad faith by passive holding of the disputed domain name and by attempting to sell it to Complainant. Such a finding is consistent with previous UDRP decisions, such as Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...
2021-08-17 - Case Details
The disputed domain name was registered on April 5, 2021, and the website to which the disputed domain name resolves to a “domain name parking” or “pay-per-click” service promoting commercial hyperlinks competing with the Complainant’s goods and services.
5. ...Furthermore, the gTLD, in this case “.com”, may be ignored when assessing the confusing similarity between a trademark and a domain name since it is a technical registration requirement (see, e.g., VAT Holding AG v. Vat.com,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-08-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Service Provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf / Orlando Watson, Netherlands.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Respondent has not responded and the Panel is unable to conceive of any basis upon which the Respondent could sensibly be said to have any rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (Telstra Corporation Ltd. v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003).
The Panel finds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name and that the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy have been fulfilled.
...
2021-12-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Zhang Fang, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-08-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Callum Frost, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba.com Singapore E-Commerce
Private Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. .../Wilson Pinheiro Jabur/
Wilson Pinheiro Jabur
Sole Panelist
Date: June 18, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Mölnlycke Health Care AB v. Callum Frost
Case No. D2025-1384
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-06-25 - Case Details
Respondent is Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Hartung
Sole Panelist
Date: September 30, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
AbbVie Inc. v. Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico
Case No. D2024-3264
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-10-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sophie, United States of America (“USA”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dominet (HK) Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Sophie
Case No. D2025-0901
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. Factual Background
The disputed domain name was registered on March 2, 2025.
...
2025-05-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Name Redacted1.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Google LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
1 The Respondent appears to have used the name of a genuine partner in the Private Client group for Taylor Wessing in the United
Kingdom when registering the disputed domain name. ...
2023-05-15 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Panel finds
that this is an appropriate case to rely on a stated consent (here by the Registered Name Holder) to order a
transfer of the Disputed Domain Name . See Archer-Daniels-Midland Company v.
...
2024-10-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is davut tuerk, davuttuerk, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-01-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot, United States / stevestrievel, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Dynadot, LLC
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...In addition to this, the Panel considers the fact that for its official website the Complainant uses the domain
name for the offering of ELEMIS products. The Domain Name is almost identical to the
Complainant’s domain name as it also incorporates the acronym of the country code of China, which is the
country the Domain Name purports to operate in.
...
2022-09-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Web Commerce Communications Limited, Client Care, Malaysia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba.com Singapore E-Commerce
Private Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-04-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Idah Idah, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Hansen A/S v. Idah Idah
Case No. D2025-4774
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2026-01-19 - Case Details
On the same date, Registrar confirmed by e-mail that the Domain Name is registered through the Registrar, that Respondent is the current registrant of the Domain Name and that the Policy is applicable to the Domain Name.
...This justifies the conclusion that both the registration and the use of the
Domain Name have been made in bad faith. See also Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin,
Maison Fondée en 1772 v. The Polygenix Group Co., WIPO
Case No. ...
2003-01-27 - Case Details