About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 61256   document(s)s (0.101 sec)

Rows

<<  <  37341 - 37360  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2025-0008 for expertsoption.co pdf (140 KB)

The Respondent is Ethan Bonner, United States of America. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu. ...O., EOLabs LLC v. Ethan Bonner Case No. DCO2025-0008 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 4. ...

2025-03-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0864 for scribddownload.com pdf (139 KB)

The Respondent is Ngo Tien Phat, Viet Nam. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GMO Internet, Inc. d/b/a Discount- Domain.com and Onamae.com (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-04-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-1587 for enovatraining.com pdf (136 KB)

Respondent is Brian Jump, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Go China Domains, Inc. ...Complainant Complainant contends that (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainants’ trademarks, (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and (iii) Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. ...

2024-06-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0865 for hellwegde.com pdf (140 KB)

The Respondent is Shelby Chaney, United States of America (“United States”). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...KG v. Shelby Chaney Case No. D2024-0865 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 4. ...

2024-05-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-5057 for synopsys-ind.com pdf (141 KB)

Respondent is Synopsys Ltd, Synopsys, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Pursuant to Complainant’s request to the Registrar to suspend the disputed domain name, the disputed domain name has been placed in “clientHold” status and now resolves to an inactive webpage. 5. ...

2025-02-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-2426 for bostikltd.com pdf (151 KB)

The Respondent is MUKWEVO DANIEL, Uganda. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Network Solutions, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...- The Complainant has not authorized, licensed, or permitted the Respondent to use any of its trademarks or domain name, or to apply for or use any domain name incorporating Complainant’s trademarks. - The disputed domain name is inactive. ...

2024-08-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-4187 for admintool-elsevier.com pdf (139 KB)

The Respondent is GOBI EBSCO Corporate Domains, Inc., United States of America. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with CV. ...There is no evidence that the Respondent has registered the Domain Name as a trademark or acquired trademark rights. There is no evidence of the Respondent’s use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the Domain Name or a name corresponding to the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. ...

2024-12-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1677 for bridorr.com html (12 KB)

Customer 1242315520 of Toronto, Canada and Karen Skipper of Elma, United States of America ("United States"). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the "Disputed Domain Name") is registered with Google Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). ...

2018-09-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-2172 for timberlandtenis.com html (13 KB)

The Respondent is See PrivacyGuardian.org, United States / Kevin Ebersbach, Germany. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (“Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Moreover, the Disputed Domain Name carries a risk of implied affiliation. The Respondent has failed to show that it has acquired any trademark rights in respect of the Disputed Domain Name or that it is commonly known by the Disputed Domain Name. ...

2019-11-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1357 for screenrant.info pdf (46 KB)

The Respondent is Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Moqueem Ahmed, Pakistan. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...He claimed that he was justified in buying the disputed domain name because it contained the “.info” Top-Level Domain (“TLD”) suffix, whereas the Complainant’s domain name used the “.com” TLD, and because the Respondent published his own content. ...

2022-07-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-0541 for iscopus.com pdf (140 KB)

The Respondent is Domains Meena, India. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Such use of the disputed domain name is unequivocal evidence of the Respondent’s registration and use of the disputed domain name in bad faith. ...

2023-04-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2025-0090 for charlesalice.co pdf (140 KB)

The Respondent is Qingqing Ren, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Dominet (HK) Limited (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Panel f inds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-12-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-3496 for alfalaval-vn.com pdf (142 KB)

The Respondent is Tran Dang Tu, Viet Nam. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Mat Bao Corporation (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-11-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-3987 for insurufy.com pdf (141 KB)

Respondent is Jason L Monroe, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-12-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2026-0584 for reprisefinancialloans.com pdf (145 KB)

The Respondent is jakchai shinghapat, Thailand. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. .../Vincent Denoyelle/ Vincent Denoyelle Sole Panelist Date: March 27, 2026 https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.1/ ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Skopos Financial, LLC v. jakchai shinghapat Case No. D2026-0584 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 4. ...

2026-04-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2026-1229 for trufragranceandbeauty.org pdf (124 KB)

Respondent is Malka Clow, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2026-06-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1435 for rolandmouret.net html (12 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...The Respondent is not commonly known by the domain name, and has not been licensed or otherwise permitted to use the trademark as a domain name or otherwise. ...

2009-12-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAU2014-0017 for penske.com.au html (12 KB)

The Respondent is M Akkaoui a/k/a Moe Akkaoui of Bankstown, Australia. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with AussieHQ Pty Ltd (the "Registrar"). 3. ...This text on the website at the Domain Name is also a link to the website's "Contact Us" page. The website at the Domain Name also features a number of advertisements. ...

2014-07-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-0097 for allianzholdings.org html (13 KB)

The Respondent is WhoisGuard, Inc. / Phillips Taylor, United States of America (“United States”). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Given the confusing similarity of the disputed domain name to the Complainant’s trademark and the absence of any relationship between the Respondent and the Complainant, such a use of the disputed domain name is neither a bona fide use nor a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. ...

2021-04-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0826 for giorgioarmanidesigns.com html (12 KB)

The Respondent is Thomas Casey, Michigan, United States of America. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc. 3. ...The fact that the disputed domain name consists entirely or in part of the Complainant's trade marks, renders the disputed domain name identical or confusingly similar to the said trade marks. ...

2009-10-12 - Case Details