The Respondent is Domain Administrator, United States of America (“U.S.”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the Disputed Domain Name. Accordingly, the Disputed
Domain Name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-08-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC, United States of America / Jugrawute Thongsiriratna, Thailand.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint, together with the amended Complaint, satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-12-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Edson Sanchez of Districo Federal, Mexico, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...This is not bona fide pursuant to UDRP jurisprudence (see Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ASD, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0903).
With respect to paragraph 4(c)(ii) of the Policy, there is no evidence that indicates that the Respondent has ever been commonly known by the disputed domain name.
...
2013-08-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Yang Xiao Yuan of Shaoyang, Hunan, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with West263 International Limited (the "Registrar").
3. ...Moreover, mere registration does not create any rights or legitimate interests, as stated before in Pharmacia & Upjohn Company v. Moreonline,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0134, "mere registration does not establish rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name". ...
2018-09-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jeff Glazer, Blue Chip Media Pty Limited, Australia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Crazy Domains FZ-LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...However, as first stated in Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003, and repeated in many subsequent decisions under the UDRP: “the concept of a domain name ‘being used in bad faith’ is not limited to positive action; inaction is within the concept. ...
2019-09-13 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Domain Names and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. Factual Background
The disputed domain name was registered on September 15, 2025. ...
2026-05-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Service Provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Thanh minh Dinh, Links45guide, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-03-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Admin Code, Code Originate Co., Ltd., Thailand.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...It further claims the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. It argues that the registration and the use of the disputed domain name by the Respondent are in bad faith and, therefore, requests the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant accordingly.
...
2019-09-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Archer Daniels, Archer DAniels Midlands, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-11-20 - Case Details
Respondent is Sharon Smith, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Porkbun LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...That domain name is not at issue in this proceeding.
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
The Southern Company v. ...
2025-10-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is SABRI MOHAMED, Morocco.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the Complainant’s trademark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly,
the disputed domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-07-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Berry Lamy, Happy Homes Florida Real Estate LLC, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Domain Name has resolved to a blank
webpage. MX records are configured for the Domain Name, allowing for creation of email addresses.
5. ...
2024-06-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Matt Wade, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Respondent’s use of the disputed domain name to impersonate the Complainant
shows that it registered the disputed domain name with the intention of fraudulently procuring the wiring of
money. ...
2023-08-24 - Case Details
Respondent is Harish Gonthina, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name incorporates the IBM trademark in its entirety. Numerous UDRP panels have recognized that incorporating a trademark in its entirety can be sufficient to establish that the disputed domain name is at least confusingly similar to a registered trademark (see e.g., PepsiCo, Inc. v. ...
2020-09-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Andreou Panayiotis of Nicosia, Cyprus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH dba Joker.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2013-05-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kenn Lee of Shanghai, the People’s Republic of China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc.
3. ...On March 8, 2011, the Center issued a decision regarding the same Complainant with respect to a different disputed domain name . See G&P Net S.p.A. v. Kenn Lee,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0122. The Respondent in that case was also a Mr. ...
2011-05-27 - Case Details
Respondent is Muah Muahh, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant reported the disputed domain name to the
Registrar on May 14, 2026, after which time the disputed domain name no longer resolved to an active
website.
5. ...
2026-07-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ling Shun Shing, of Shanghai, China ("the Respondent").
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name ("the domain name") is registered with iHoldings.com Inc. d/b/a DotRegistrar.com ("the Registrar").
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2003-06-13 - Case Details
Customer 1246827457 / Gopal Yadav, Onineaudiotraining, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Google LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Edmunds.com, Inc. v. Digi Real Estate Foundation,
WIPO Case No. D2006-1043. Furthermore, the addition of the applicable Top-Level Domain in a domain name is viewed as a standard registration requirement and is disregarded under the confusing similarity test. ...
2020-06-09 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...See, Lilly ICOS LIC v. John
Hopking/Neo net Ltd, WIPO Case No. D2005-0694
(Annex 10, C); and other WIPO Domain Name cases (Annex 10, D, E, F, G, and H).
...
2006-10-23 - Case Details