The Respondent is Nicole Huisman of Holland, Michigan, United States of America (the “USA”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Inic GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...In The Vanguard Group, Inc. v. Lorna Kang,
WIPO Case No. D2002-1064, the panel found that: “To satisfy the requirements of Policy paragraph 4(c)(i), the Respondent’s use of the disputed domain name must be in connection with a “bona fide” offering of goods or services. ...
2014-07-28 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...In the first disputed domain name, the word ISO is followed by the term “1stop”. In the second disputed domain name, the word ISO is followed by “9000commerce.” ...
2005-11-02 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint, satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...D2008-0556 (finding that the domain name is confusingly similar to the REPSOL YPF trade mark, differing only with regard to a descriptive element, the word “online”); see also Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. ...
2008-07-31 - Case Details
Respondent is Contactprivacy.com of Toronto, Canada / TSP Pilot, LLC of Germantown, Maryland, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc.
3. ...C. Claim that the Domain Name was Released
Respondent claimed it had released ownership of the disputed domain name; however, according to the Registrar, the disputed domain name had not been released and is still in the name of Respondent. ...
2010-10-21 - Case Details
No. 107/7 Bengun Han Gayrettepe, Istanbul, Turkey ("Unimetal").
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Domain Name at issue is and the registrar is Network Solutions, Inc., of Virginia 20170, USA.
3. ...Parties’ Contentions
Storck has contended that the Domain Name in question is identical or confusingly similar to its trade mark, that Unimetal has no right or legitimate interest in respect of the Domain Name, and that the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2002-01-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Aleksandr Lukyanov, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Registrar of Domain Names REG.RU
LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel has considered whether the Respondent could be regarded as a reseller or service provider that
may have legitimate interests in a disputed domain name under the criteria set out in Oki Data Americas, Inc.
v. ASD, Inc., WIPO Case No. D2001-0903. ...
2025-10-16 - Case Details
Respondent is Name Redacted1.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Wild West Domains, LLC (“Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“Policy”), the Rules for Uniform
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain
Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“Supplemental Rules”).
1It appears Respondent registered the disputed domain name using the name of a third party. ...
2025-08-08 - Case Details
The disputed domain name <كارفور.vip> [xn--mgbua7dh7a.vip] is registered with Wild West Domains, LLC.
(collectively referred to as “disputed domain names” and “Registrars”)
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-01-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Cen Paul, horizonfunding, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
NameCheap, Inc. ...Isenberg
Sole Panelist
Date: November 13, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
VGP IPCo LLC and Valvoline Licensing and Intellectual Property LLC v. Cen Paul, horizonfunding
Case No. D2024-4032
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-11-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Naby Diaw, of Bad Homburg, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PSI-USA, Inc.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2008-01-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Chidiebere Anioke, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-09-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Lauren stones, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant owns and operates the website hosted at the domain name and has used its
domain name for more than a decade in connection with the provision of website hosting and cloud
computing services.
...
2025-03-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mudasir Ejaz, yehrishtakyakehlata, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The generic Top-Level Domain “.tools” in the disputed domain name may be disregarded.
Second, the Complainant asserts that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed
domain name. ...
2024-10-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Julien Mainville, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Trade Mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name
is confusingly similar to the Trade Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-11-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Name Redacted.1
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
1 The Respondent appears to have used the name of a third party when registering the disputed domain name. ...
2022-09-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Vadac b.v. of Deventer, the Netherlands.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with SIDN through Tiscom Hosting B.V.
3. ...The Complainant has shown that it has rights in the Trademark.
The Domain Name incorporates the Trademark in its entirety. Previous panels have found that a domain name is confusingly similar to a complainant’s trademark where the domain name incorporates the trademark in its entirety. ...
2017-07-05 - Case Details
Respondent is tucaminoalexito.biz of Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC.
3. ...No. 0925164, covering precisely umbrellas. See Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v. Christine Jil,
WIPO Case No. D2011-2241 (“The addition of the terms “crystal” and “outlet” as suffixes to the SWAROVSKI mark in the Domain Name does not lessen the confusing similarity between the mark and Domain Name. ...
2012-06-15 - Case Details
D2009-0227; and Sermo, Inc. v. CatalystMD, LLC,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0647. This is commonly tested by comparing the mark and the disputed domain name in appearance, sound, meaning, and overall impression. ...Reverse Domain Name Hijacking is defined under the UDRP Rules as ‘using the UDRP in bad faith to attempt to deprive a registered domain-name holder of a domain name’.
...
2012-08-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Privacy, Cyprus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with SNAPNAMES, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on April 13, 2024.
The record shows that the disputed domain name resolves to an inactive page with no visible content.
5. ...
2025-08-07 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
2.1 The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with Tucows Inc. ...It is an issue that the Panel attempted to explore in Johnson & Johnson v. Ebubekir Ozdogan,
WIPO Case No. D2015-1031. That was not a case which involved a criticism site, but the same issues arose of when an addition to a trade mark in a domain name meant that the domain name no longer impermissibly impersonated the trade mark owner.
6.13 So far as the present case is concerned, the Panel has reached the conclusion that the Domain Name is on the wrong side of the line. ...
2018-01-30 - Case Details