The Respondent is DNS Administrator / Cykon Technology Limited of Hong Kong, SAR of China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with OnlineNic, Inc. d/b/a China-Channel.com.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2010-02-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Aarnav Paul, Arnav It Farm, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
/Assen Alexiev/
Assen Alexiev
Sole Panelist
Date: February 26, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Stunlock LLC v. ...
2024-03-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Service Provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Thanh Le, Viet Nam.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Respondent registered the disputed domain name using a privacy service. The underlying registrant has been disclosed as Thanh Le, whose name bears no resemblance to the disputed domain name. ...
2022-03-30 - Case Details
Respondent"), having its office at Edificio Orillac, Tercer Piso, Calle 54, Nuevo Urbanizacion Obarillo, Arartado 2526, Panama 5, Panama.
2. The Domain Names and Registrar
The domain names at issue are:
("Domain Name 1")
("Domain Name 2")
("Domain Name 3")
(jointly referred to as the "Domain Names"), all registered with Tucows.com, Inc. ...This bears the risk that Internet users may confuse Domain Name 3 with Complainant's mark.
In their submissions, both parties refer to WIPO
Case No. D2001-0007, Société Accor v. ...
2001-06-29 - Case Details
However, as first stated in Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003, and repeated in many subsequent decisions under the UDRP:
“the concept of a domain name ‘being used in bad faith' is not limited to positive action; inaction is within the concept. ...By registering the domain name the Respondent further prevents the Complainant from being present under the “.org” gTLD under a domain name that seems to be a natural domain name to use for the Complainant. ...
2008-08-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mayor Roland, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...See for example
Greenspring Associates, Inc. v. Lisa Knowles, Victoria capital pty, WIPO Case No. D2019-0265.
The Panel finds the unregistered mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. ...
2023-12-11 - Case Details
Respondent is Joe Biden, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name incorporates Complainant’s SOLVAY trademark in its entirety. Numerous UDRP panels have recognized that incorporating a trademark in its entirety can be sufficient to establish that the disputed domain name is at least confusingly similar to a registered trademark (see, e.g., PepsiCo, Inc. v. ...
2020-03-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Endi Elua Souza Ouvidio, iqcigarrets, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Regardless of whether the products offered for sale are genuine or not, these circumstances indicate that the Respondent is not using the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. See Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ...
2022-01-10 - Case Details
Respondent is Karmei Tse Morin, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Badgley
Sole Panelist
Date: January 22, 2026
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
The Wyanoke Group v. Karmei Tse Morin
Case No. D2025-4909
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2026-01-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mohammad Ali Khodaie of Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with IRNIC.
3. Procedural History
The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the "Center") on August 19, 2016. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "irDRP"), the Rules for .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2016-10-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Vahid Shirmohamadi of Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with IRNIC.
3. Procedural History
The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the "Center") on August 19, 2016. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "irDRP"), the Rules for .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2016-10-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Andrew Tuinstra, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Steinhardt
Sole Panelist
Date: March 27, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Synopsys, Inc. v. Andrew Tuinstra
Case No. D2024-0616
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-04-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is BioNh BioNh, WeHere, Chile.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-03-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is LATOYA MCLELLAN, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gandi SAS (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered by the Respondent on October 19, 2023. While the disputed
domain name resolves to an inactive website, the Complainant has provided evidence that the disputed
domain name has been used in a fraudulent email scam impersonating one of its employees.
5. ...
2024-03-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Zhonghui Guo, PCs Aid, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the ACER mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-01-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mavv Jizzwadd Jizzus, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name redirects to a blank
page. To the best of the Complainant’s knowledge, the disputed domain name has never
resolved to an active website.
5. ...
2025-12-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Felix White, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-12-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is ling mei yan, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DropCatch.com 1002 LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The
Complainant also registered, before the registration of the disputed domain name, its own domain name,
.
The disputed domain name was registered on September 23, 2023. ...
2024-11-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Goransson Gustavsson, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gransy, s.r.o. d/b/a subreg.cz (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-06-10 - Case Details
According to the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”), section 1.7, “in cases where a domain name incorporates the entirety of a trademark, or where at least a dominant feature of the relevant mark is recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of UDRP standing” (see also earlier UDRP decisions such as Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v Richard McLeod d/b/a For Sale,
WIPO Case No. ...However, the Panel notes that on the date of this decision, the disputed domain names direct to inactive webpages. In this regard, the Panel finds that holding a domain name passively, without making any use of it, also does not confer any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names on the Respondent (see earlier UDRP decisions such as Bollore SE v. ...
2022-02-07 - Case Details