The Respondent is Gabin Kounchou, Canada, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <1xbet-senegal.sn> is registered with Marcaria.com International LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Indeed, the disputed domain name and the corresponding website are of
a nature be perceived by the Internet users as the Complainant’s domain name and website for Senegal.
...
2024-07-11 - Case Details
Respondent is San Mark, San Mark, LLC, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo,
LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Badgley
Sole Panelist
Date: August 28, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Pye-Barker Fire & Safety, LLC v. San Mark, San Mark, LLC
Case No. D2025-2434
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2025-09-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is li jiang, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Cosmotown, Inc. ...On August 5, 2024, the Respondent registered the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name is
passively held and does not lead to any active website.
5. ...
2025-10-08 - Case Details
Respondent is gaojin, Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba.com Singapore E-Commerce Private
Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant contends that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name as
Respondent (i) has never been licensed or authorized by Complainant to use the AXA mark or to register a
domain name including the AXA mark, (ii) is not commonly known by the disputed domain name, and (iii) has
not made any bona fide use of the disputed domain name and has merely passively held the disputed
domain name since registering it in May 2023.
...
2024-03-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Qhdhye Ecdew, Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-05-16 - Case Details
Respondent is Karol Kruszyniewicz, VEG KING EUROPE LTD, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com,
LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy lists the three elements which Complainant must satisfy with respect to the
Domain Name:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which
Complainant has rights; and
(ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2024-09-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mark Anthony, MAA Travels of New Delhi, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2017-03-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sundari Pratama of Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia / Whoisguard Protected / Whoisguard, Inc. of Panama, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with eNom (the "Registrar").
3. ...Further, the Respondent's failure to accurately disclose the relationship between the Respondent and the Complainant prevents the Respondent from establishing any rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name pursuant to Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ASD Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0903.
The Complainant asserts that considering that LEGO is a world famous trademark and that the website connected to the Domain Name displays the Complainant's famous logo and LEGO products, it is clear that the Respondent knew of the Complainant's legal rights in the name LEGO at the time of the Domain Name registration. ...
2015-07-30 - Case Details
The Panel, therefore, finds that the disputed domain name was registered in bad faith.
It is equally clear that the disputed domain name is also being used in bad faith. ...However, this Panel finds that if supporting a phishing scheme is regarded as an example of using a domain name in bad faith (See e.g., DeLaval Holding AB v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy LLL / Craig Kennedy,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-06-09 - Case Details
The Domain Name , an internationalized domain
name (“IDN”), translates as in Punycode. ...See, for instance, Württembergische Versicherung AG v. Emir
Ulu, WIPO Case No. D2006-0278 (finding that the domain name “ should be considered as equivalent to ”).
5. ...
2024-05-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Daryna Shkelebei, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2026-07-16 - Case Details
The disputed domain name was registered on March 30, 2014.
The disputed domain name was registered on March 30, 2014.
...In addition to the above, passive holding of a domain name does not prevent a finding of bad faith use. See Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. ...
2015-05-07 - Case Details
The Domain Names and Registrars
The disputed domain name <인스타고수.com> (xn--299ak61b7lao3nqon.com) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2020-10-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ecolab Srl, ecolab-roma.com, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Squarespace Domains II LLC
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...In the case at hand, the Panel considers the following circumstances surrounding the registration of the
disputed domain name as suggesting that the Respondent was aware that it has no rights or legitimate
interests in the disputed domain name, and that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being
used in bad faith:
(i) the distinctiveness of the Complainant’s trademark which (a) has existed for many years, (b) which is the
dominant element of the Complainant’s company name and tradename, (c) which have existed have been
used for roughly three decades;
(ii) the nature of the disputed domain name, including the Complainant’s trademark in combination with a
geographic term which suggests sponsorship or endorsement by the Complainant;
(iii) the Respondent’s failure to respond to the Complainant’s cease-and-desist correspondence through the
Registrar’s contact form;
(iv) the Respondent’s failure to respond to the Complaint and bring forward any plausible arguments for a
plausible legitimate active use that the Respondent could make of the disputed domain name;
(v) the use of inaccurate and incomplete contact details when registering the disputed domain name.
...
2026-03-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Nabiev Ravshan, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Registrar of Domain Names REG.RU LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent appears to be a Russian individual. According to the WhoIs, the disputed domain name was registered in the name of the Respondent on January 30, 2021. The website under the disputed domain name is currently inactive. ...
2021-08-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Svc Consultant, SVC consultant, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the VFS mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-05-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mike Willer of Burundi.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2014-03-27 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Not for the first time, the Panel is reminded of the
observations of a panel in a relatively early case under the Policy, The Thread.com, LLC v. Jeffrey S.
Poploff, WIPO Case No. D2000-1470. That panel stated that “This Panel is not a general domain name
court, and the Policy is not designed to adjudicate all disputes of any kind that relate in any way to domain
names. ...
2022-09-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is John Robert, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-07-04 - Case Details
The disputed domain name is substantially similar to the Complainant’s trademark BARCLAYS.
2. The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name.
3. ...The addition of the generic word “bank” does not avoid confusion or distinguish the disputed domain name from the mark BARCLAYS. In fact, since the word “bank” describes the Complainant’s core services, the addition of this word is more likely to increase confusion (see Barclays Bank PLC v. ...
2011-08-15 - Case Details