About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 58508   document(s)s (0.121 sec)

Rows

<<  <  36621 - 36640  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-2150 for cashnetsusa.net pdf (137 KB)

The Respondent is Jennine Given, India. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Trade Mark predates the dispute domain name by at least a decade. - The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith by the Respondent. ...

2024-07-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-1236 for coxbusinesscloud.com html (15 KB)

The Respondent is Registration Private, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The Disputed Domain Name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2020-07-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-3741 for mhyenvoyair.com pdf (160 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION American Airlines, Inc. v. Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc. Case No. D2024-3741 1. The Parties The Complainant is American Airlines, Inc., United States of America (“US”), represented by Greenberg Traurig, LLP, US. The Respondent is Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc., Cyprus. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...

2024-11-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-4336 for decathlonusa.careers html (13 KB)

The Respondent is Privacy Service Provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Ben Kessler, United States of America (the “United Sates”). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2022-03-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-0820 for perfectpetplan.com html (24 KB)

Respondent is Jesse Patterson of King, North Carolina, United States of America ("United States"). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Network Solutions, LLC (the "Registrar"). 3. ...It is well established that such kind of additions are inapt to distinguish a domain name from the mark it incorporates. See WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition ("WIPO Overview 3.0"); Revlon Consumer Products Corporation v. ...

2018-07-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-2555 for generic-revlimid.com html (14 KB)

The Respondent is Christin Nadel, Germany. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...With respect to use, the Respondent currently makes only passive use of the disputed domain name but this does not preclude a finding of use in bad faith. See Telstra Corporation Ltd v. Nuclear Marshmallows, WIPO Case No. ...

2019-12-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-3806 for eutelsat.sucks html (24 KB)

The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Rebel Ltd (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Moreover, the Complainant asserts that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name since it has not been authorized by the Complainant to register the disputed domain name or to use its trademark within the disputed domain name, it is not commonly known by the disputed domain name, nor it is making a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. ...

2022-01-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-1134 for equinor-ind.net pdf (142 KB)

The Respondent is Zainul Adim, Indonesia. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Isenberg Sole Panelist Date: April 29, 2024 https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/ ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Equinor ASA v. Zainul Adim Case No. D2024-1134 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 4. ...

2024-05-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1851 for mulchexpressusa.com html (13 KB)

The Respondent is PrivacyProtect.org, Robert Hauck a/k/a Robert Brown of Moergestel, the Netherlands and Summerville, South Carolina, United States of America, respectively. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Answerable.com (I) Pvt Ltd. ...Thus, the consensus view is that paragraph 4(c) of the Policy shifts the burden to the Respondent to come forward with evidence of a right or legitimate interest in the Domain Name, once the Complainant has made a prima facie showing (as it has in this case). See, e.g., Document Technologies, Inc. v. ...

2011-01-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-4371 for facebook-sex.com pdf (142 KB)

The Respondent is hai zhu fang, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with DropCatch.com 815 LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Panel therefore finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Mark, since the disputed domain name incorporates the Mark in its entirety. ...

2023-01-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-2494 for hillandssmith.com pdf (145 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). .../Wilson Pinheiro Jabur/ Wilson Pinheiro Jabur Sole Panelist Date: September 6, 2022 https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/ ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Hill & Smith Holdings PLC v. Mark Clapper, Clapper llc Case No. D2022-2494 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. ...

2022-09-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0382 for futurealgruop.com pdf (141 KB)

The Respondent is Philip Chu, Transpacific Financial Inc, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-03-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-2250 for wisttrand.com html (14 KB)

The Respondent is Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Zhi Hao, Singapore. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Since July 4, 2000, the Complainant has owned the domain name that directs to its own website. The Domain Name was registered on February 15, 2021. ...

2021-08-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2001-1489 for akbank.net html (16 KB)

The Respondent is Gurlercafe Internet Hizmetleri, an internet-café serving in Turkey.   2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is . The Registrar of the domain name is ItsYourDomain with an address in Illinois, United States of America.   3. ...Identical or confusingly similar (paragraph 4(a)(i)) The Respondent has registered the domain name . This domain name is identical to Complainant’s trademark "akbank", except that the domain name adds the generic top-level-domain ".com". ...

2002-03-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-1000 for shoosmiths.com html (12 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). ...Complainant has shown that it previously registered and renewed the disputed domain name, and that only through an error was the domain name available for registration by Respondent. ...

2003-01-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-2072 for azkoyenvendingl.cloud, azkoyenvendingl.com pdf (177 KB)

page 2 The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...Consolidation: Multiple Respondents The amended Complaint was filed in relation to nominally different domain name registrants. The Complainant alleges that the domain name registrants are the same entity or mere alter egos of each other, or under common control. ...

2024-09-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2064 for olxquickr.com html (13 KB)

The Respondent is Kumbha Ram Godara, N/A of Churu, Rajasthan, India. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Cloud Group Limited (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2012-12-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-2993 for skzic.support html (14 KB)

The Respondent is Amir Mohammad Amini (MOHAMMAD89375), Iran (Islamic Republic of). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Ascio Technologies Inc. ...Prior UDRP panels have found that the non-use of a domain name (including a blank page) would not prevent a finding of bad faith under the doctrine of passive holding; see WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.3; see also Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...

2021-02-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-0420 for nutraderm.com html (33 KB)

Complainants The Complainants contend that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to trademarks in which the Complainants own rights; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...The Complainants contend that this indicates that there has been no valid use of the disputed domain name. The Complainants assert that the disputed domain name is identical to their NUTRADERM trademark, which dates back 40 years before the registration of the disputed domain name. ...

2015-05-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2967 for unleashtheultrabeast.com pdf (134 KB)

The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Complainant also claims that it owns, among others, the domain name . The disputed domain name was registered on June 4, 2025, and resolves to an error webpage. 5. ...

2025-09-18 - Case Details