The Respondent is Hasan Ahmed, Bangladesh.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Metaregistrar BV (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-09-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is 公益 全球, Thailand.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-09-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Beverly Shevchenko, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the CAXINO mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-09-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mae Hopper, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Network Solutions, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-06-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Hector Rodriguez, pubistarargetina, Argentina.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Palazzi
Sole Panelist
Date: June 26, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
YPF S.A. v. Hector Rodriguez, pubistarargetina
Case No. D2024-1776
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-07-18 - Case Details
Respondent is Stephen Pusateri, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Global Domain Group LLC (“Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (“Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(“Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
“Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-07-26 - Case Details
page 2
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...As to the disputed domain name which directs to a
blank page, the Panel notes that the non-use of this disputed domain name also does not confer rights or
legitimate interests on the Respondent under the circumstances of this case.
...
2025-06-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Repossessed by Go Daddy, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. .../Edoardo Fano/
Edoardo Fano
Sole Panelist
Date: November 12, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobrás v. Repossessed by Go Daddy
Case No. D2024-3127
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-11-15 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...See B & H Foto & Electronics Corp. v. Domains by Proxy, Inc. / Joseph Gross,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0842.
In the instant proceeding, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's VERITAS mark as it incorporates the VERITAS mark in its entirety at the head of the disputed domain name. ...
2018-06-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Islam Akbar, Slaemweb, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Leppink
Sole Panelist
Date: March 25, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Itron, Inc. v. Islam Akbar, Slaemweb
Case No. D2024-0473
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-03-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kate Milenskaya, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...According to the WhoIs entry, said domain name was registered on
October 2, 2007. No history has been produced of the use of this domain name.
...
2024-01-16 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint, together with the amendment to the Complaint, satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
According to paragraph
4(b) of the Policy, the following circumstances shall be evidence of the registration
and use of a domain name in bad faith:
“(i) circumstances
indicating that you have registered or you have acquired the domain name primarily
for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the domain name
registration to the complainant who is the owner of the trademark or service
mark or to a competitor of that complainant, for valuable consideration in excess
of your documented out-of-pocket costs directly related to the domain name;
or
(ii) you have registered the domain name in order to prevent the owner of the
trademark or service mark from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain
name, provided that you have engaged in a pattern of such conduct; or
(iii) you have registered the domain name primarily for the purpose of disrupting
the business of a competitor; or
(iv) by using the domain name, you have intentionally attempted to attract,
for commercial gain, Internet users to your web site or other on-line location,
by creating a likelihood of confusion with the complainant’s mark as to
the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of your web site or location
or of a product or service on your web site or location.”
...
2005-04-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Hoc Tap Tot, Jayse, Australia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar(s)
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
As stated in many decisions rendered under the Policy (e.g. Robert Ellenbogen v. Mike Pearson,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0001) both conditions, registration and use in bad faith, must be demonstrated; consequently, the Complainant must show that:
- the disputed domain name was registered by the Respondent in bad faith, and
- the disputed domain name is being used by the Respondent in bad faith.
...
2021-09-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Bobbie Lisa, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Domain Name”) is registered with GMO Internet, Inc.
...The entirety of the LENNAR mark is reproduced within the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Domain Name is
confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-06-26 - Case Details
The “www.attractive.com.au” site to which Domain Name resolves to also contains the opportunity to make inquiries about the purchase of the Domain Name.
5. ...It owns a trade mark registration for the TASER Mark in Australia.
The Domain Name is identical to the TASER Mark, and the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the TASER Mark.
...
2013-07-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is None, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Domaininternetname,
LLC.
3. ...It furthermore submits that (A) the domain name is identical to its trademark VENTELO in which it has rights; (B) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and (C) the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2006-06-30 - Case Details
The Second Respondent is Rampe Purda of Hailuoto, Finland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Hebei Guoji Maoyi (Shanghai) Ltd aka Hebei International Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. dba HebeiDomains.com.
3. ...The Respondents’ name does not incorporate the Domain Name. The Respondents are using the Domain Name to resolve to websites offering sponsored links to other websites, unconnected with the Complainant, that offer various goods and services. ...
2011-02-14 - Case Details
Collectively, the “Complainants”)
The Respondent is Bush Fire, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The disputed domain name does not resolve to an active website. The disputed domain name was used in an email address that also used the name of an employee of the Complainants when contacti...
5. ...
2025-05-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is deeee sswwww, seaboard, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-03-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is kivan nvrvzi gvrabi, Iran (Islamic Republic of).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH dba Joker.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Burn World-Wide, Ltd. d/b/a BGT Partners v. Banta Global Turnkey Ltd,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0470.
Generally speaking, a finding that a domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith requires an inference to be drawn that the respondent in question has registered and is using the disputed domain name to take advantage of its significance as a trademark owned by (usually) the complainant.
...
2021-08-30 - Case Details