Respondent is Eric Jordan, aarq, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Complainant contends
that the addition of the letter “r” and the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) to the disputed domain name
are insufficient to distinguish the disputed domain name from the COORSTEK Marks.
...
2025-06-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Clarice Padilha, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...H.-The disputed domain name was registered on December 26, 2024. At the time the Complaint was filed,
the disputed domain name displayed the Registrar’s parking page.
5. ...
2025-03-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC, United States of America / Marta Ramos, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Disputed Domain Name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Previous UDRP panels have found that where the reputation of a complainant in a given mark is significant and the mark has strong similarities to the Disputed Domain Name, the likelihood of confusion is such that bad faith may be inferred (see, e.g., Verner Panton Design v. ...
2019-07-02 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Domain Names and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. Factual Background
The disputed domain name was registered on September 15, 2025. ...
2026-05-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is yuhua pang, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Turning to the comparison exercise, the disputed domain name contains the Complainant’s mark in its
entirety, absent the ampersand which cannot be reproduced in a domain name for technical reasons. ...
2023-03-06 - Case Details
Respondent is George Washington, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant contends Respondent is not commonly known by the
disputed domain name and is not making a legitimate non-commercial or fair use of the disputed domain
name.
Complainant contends that Respondent registered and has used the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2025-05-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is mourad salmi, Morocco.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the Trade Mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is identical to the Trade Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2026-04-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Admin, Palmside Holdings of Sydney, Australia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain names and are registered with Rebel.com Corp (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The addition of a second “t”, to make the two words “smart” and “traveller”, does not preclude the confusing similarity of the second disputed domain name with the Complainant’s trademark. Accordingly, the Panel finds that the first disputed domain name is identical to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights, and the second disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights.
...
2019-02-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is ahmed, maknes, Morocco.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain names , , and are registered with
Dynadot, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. .../Andrea Mondini/
Andrea Mondini
Sole Panelist
Date: October 30, 2022
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2000/d2000-0003.html
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
beIN Media Group L.L.C v. ahmed, maknes
Case No. D2022-3431
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
7. ...
2022-11-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is POSTECH, POSTECH IE CAMlab San31 Hyojadong Namgu, of Pohang, Kyungbuk 790-784, Replublic of Korea. The Respondent is represented by the domain name registrant’s administrative contact, Hong Hee Dong.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is ("the domain name"). ...The status of the domain name was reported as "active". The Registrar advised that the administrative and technical contact for the domain name was Mr. ...
2002-01-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Selim Dogan, Kampus Konya, Turkey.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dotster, Inc.
3. ...D. Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Paragraph 1 defines reverse domain name hijacking
as “using the Policy in bad faith to attempt to deprive a registered domain-name
holder of a domain name”. ...
2006-04-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Andre Fabrici, Gibraltar.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2021-04-20 - Case Details
The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed
domain name. The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
The Complainant requested that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
...Such use does
not constitute use of the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services.
The Respondent has not been commonly known by the disputed domain name and is not making a
legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name.
...
2023-10-03 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name < helmbankusaonline.com> is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-11-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Xueqing Yi, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-01-17 - Case Details
The Domain Name(s) and Registrar(s)
The disputed domain names are "adobeacrobat.com" and "acrobatreader.com".
...By WHOIS search of March 21, 2000, the Panel independently determined that the domain name "bluemountain.com" is not currently registered in the name of Oz Domains.
3. See Educational Testing Service v. ...
2000-03-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Marzena Marzena of Krakow, Poland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The use of the word “outlets” along with the SWAROVSKI trademark creates the impression that the disputed domain name contains information and products from the Complainant. See Coach, Inc. v. Zongxin Trade Co Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2011-08-18 - Case Details
Edison Luiz Goncalez of Guarulhos, Brazil / Domains by Proxy, LLC of Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2015-12-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ihar Poresh, QWERTY22 DOO, Montenegro.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Danesco Trading Ltd. ...Maier
Sole Panelist
Date: March 13, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Fenix International Limited v. Ihar Poresh, QWERTY22 DOO
Case No. D2024-0336
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-03-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Waleed Butt, UK.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com,
LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the Domain Name be transferred to the Complainant.
/Ian Lowe/
Ian Lowe
Sole Panelist
Date: September 27, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Tempcover Ltd v. ...
2024-10-04 - Case Details