The Respondent is sana bb, kps, Cambodia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-11-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is GGray Jason, United States of America (“United States”)
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...O'Farrell
Sole Panelist
Date: May 27, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
NOSE v. GGray Jason
Case No. D2024-1389
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-05-31 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant alleges that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, in particular that, so far as the Complainant is aware, the Respondent is not generally known by the disputed domain name, and the Complainant has not authorized the Respondent to use its MICHELIN trademark in connection with registration of a domain name, or otherwise.
...
2021-10-11 - Case Details
Singh Dha with an address of 531 Barking Road, Eastham, London, England.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is .
The registrar is CORE Internet Council of Registrars.
...Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy requires the Complainant to prove that:
(i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights;
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name;
(iii) the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2001-07-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is DNS Administrator / Cykon Technology Limited of Hong Kong, SAR of China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with OnlineNic, Inc. d/b/a China-Channel.com.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2010-02-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Aarnav Paul, Arnav It Farm, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
/Assen Alexiev/
Assen Alexiev
Sole Panelist
Date: February 26, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Stunlock LLC v. ...
2024-03-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Executive Products Ltd. with an address at County Meath, Ireland.
2. The Domain Name(s) and Registrar(s)
The domain names at issue in these proceedings are "guinnesspubs.com", "guinnesspubs.net" and "guinnesspubs.org". ...The question has however been canvassed in other administrative proceedings and in the courts of other jurisdictions.
In Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Walsucks and Walmarket Puerto Rico WIPO case D2000-0477 the question of confusing similarity was considered in the following terms:
"The question whether a domain name and a trademark are confusingly similar involves the application of a multifactored test exemplified in the decision of the U.S. ...
2001-03-07 - Case Details
In addition to that, the lack of any good faith use of the disputed domain which is being used in connection with PPC links available at the parked webpage that resolves from the disputed domain name, does not characterize an evidence of the Respondent’s use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the disputed domain name or a name corresponding to the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services.
...The registration and use of the disputed domain name in bad faith can be found in the present case in view of the following circumstances:
(i) the Respondent has provided no evidence whatsoever of any actual or contemplated good faith use of the disputed domain name, not having submitted a response;
(ii) the Respondent has not replied to the cease-and-desist letter sent prior to this procedure;
(iii) the use of the disputed domain name in connection with a parked webpage displaying PPC links;
(iv) the Complainant’s trademarks have a date of first use in commerce that predates the registration of the disputed domain name; and
(v) the nature of the disputed domain name (reproducing the entirety of the Complainant’s trademark and misspelling the “optical” term), and the Respondent’s intention to unduly profit from the value of the Complainant’s trademark, suggest rather a clear indication of the Respondent’s registration and holding of the disputed domain name in bad faith, with the implausibility of any good faith use to which the disputed domain name may be put.
...
2021-12-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Pencreach Jacques, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2021-06-28 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant is further the registered owner of the Turkish Trad...
The disputed domain name was registered on December 5, 2022.
The disputed domain name was registered on March 17, 2022.
...
2023-03-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is not represented in these proceedings.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Key-Systems GmbH dba domaindiscount24.com.
3. ...The Domain Name incorporates the complete trademark, only adding the generic domain extension “.mobi”. Therefore, the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trademarks.
...
2008-05-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Proxy Protection LLC, United States / Brenda Drake, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
DreamHost, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Isenberg
Sole Panelist
Date: June 16, 2022
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
JJR Enterprises, LLC, Straight Arrow News, LLC v. Proxy Protection LLC / Brenda Drake
Case No. D2022-1506
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2022-06-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Eusof Ali, HMEA World, Bangladesh.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent has not responded and the Panel is unable to conceive of any basis upon which the Respondent could sensibly be said to have any rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000‑0003).
The fact that the Respondent has indicated to the Center that it is “ready to transfer the domain any time” would seem to confirm that it has no rights nor legitimate interests in the disputed domain name and that the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy have been fulfilled.
...
2022-02-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Fred Bingo, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...For such reasons, the Panel finds that the Respondent must have been fully aware of the Complainant’s trademarks and activities when it registered the disputed domain name. See, e.g., Virgin Enterprises Limited v. Vincent Battista,
WIPO Case No. D2018‑1416.
As regards the use of the disputed domain name, the fact that the website at which the disputed domain name resolves is inactive does not preclude a finding of bad faith, nor does it detract from the Respondent’s bad faith. ...
2021-07-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Rameez Ghayas Usmani, HAROHelpareporter, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar(s)
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...In this case, the Respondent’s registration and use of the Domain Name creates a risk of implied affiliation
due to the composition of the Domain Name (which fully incorporates the Trademarks) and the content of the
website to which the Domain Name resolves. ...
2026-01-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Admin, Whois Privacy Corp., Bahamas / roberto vaccarella, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Internet Domain Service BS Corp (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent does not appear to make any legitimate noncommercial or fair
use of the disputed domain name, nor any use in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services.
In fact, the disputed domain name redirects to the website of a domain name broker where the disputed
domain name is offered for sale. ...
2022-07-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Whois Privacy, Whois Privacy (enumDNS dba) of Bettembourg, Luxembourg / MattK Karrar of Beijing, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with EuroDNS S.A. ...The Domain Name redirects to a website which promotes and sells competitive products and services which evidences a lack of rights or legitimate interests under the Policy, see Newcastle Permanent Building Society Limited v. ...
2017-07-18 - Case Details
Customer 0156768379, Canada / Amber Beauty, Glow Organics, LLC, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Tucows Inc. ...Here, the Domain Name was registered on January 22, 2020.
Third, Complainant argues that Respondent’s use of the Domain Name is not bona fide. ...
2020-06-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Gary Brooks, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NetEarth One Inc. d/b/a NetEarth (the “Registrar”).
3. ...There are no rights or legitimate interests held by the Respondent in respect of the Domain Name. The Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name nor does the Respondent have any authorization from the Complainant to register the Domain Name. ...
2021-04-14 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...A gTLD, in this case “.com”, may be ignored when assessing the confusing similarity between a trademark and a domain name since it is a technical registration requirement (see, e.g., VAT Holding AG v. Vat.com,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-12-11 - Case Details