The Respondent is Yuran, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name initially redirected to a dan.com parking page that stated “The domain name
Cinqair.co is for sale!”. ...
2024-11-25 - Case Details
Respondent is Naija Host of Silver Springs, Maryland, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...See America Online, Inc. v. Xianfeng Fu,
WIPO Case No. 2000-1374 (holding that it would be "unconscionable to find a bona fide offering of services in a respondent's operation of web-site using a domain name which is confusingly similar to the complainant's mark and for the same business").
...
2015-08-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is TOEFL, with address in New York, New York, USA.
2. The Domain Name(s) and Registrar(s)
The disputed domain name is "toefl.com".
The registrar of the disputed domain name is Network Solutions, Inc., with business address in Herndon, Virginia, USA.
3. ...Id., at page (v).
3. When a domain name is used on goods, it takes on the characteristics of a trademark.
4. See, e.g., Avery Dennison v. ...
2000-03-17 - Case Details
Respondent is Matthew Mitchell of Covina, California, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2012-03-08 - Case Details
There are several UDRP decisions stating that confusing similarity, for the purposes of the Policy, is established when a domain name wholly incorporates a complainant’s mark and only adds a generic word along with, in this case, the letter “a” or the number “1” (see i.e., Société del Hotels Méridien v. ...Moreover, the panel does not consider, when analyzing the identity or similarity, the suffix like in this case “.info” because it is a necessary component of the domain name and does not give any distinctiveness (see i.e., Crédit Industrile et Commercial SA v. Name Privacy,
WIPO Case No. ...
2007-07-25 - Case Details
Registrations Aktien Gesellschaft of Kingstown, Saint Vincent And The Grenadines.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint and the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2016-06-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mark Mayo of Manila, Philippines, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-02-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Shahin Masoum, Iran (Islamic Republic of).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Openprovider (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The requirements outlined in Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ASD, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0903 are not met in the current case.
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2019-11-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Odobescu Adrian of Bucharest, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with ROTLD (the "Registry").
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical to its trademark BLABLACAR, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name and the Respondent registered and uses the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2014-09-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Stanislav Cernevic of Kaunas, Lithuania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2012-08-07 - Case Details
Respondent is Vicki Garcia, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...Complainant
Complainant contends that (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainants’
trademarks, (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and (iii)
Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2025-12-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tapan Sahni, United Arab Emirates (“UAE”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Hughes
Sole Panelist
Date: December 21, 2023
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Philip Morris Products S.A. v. Tapan Sahni
Case No. D2023-4435
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-01-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is sammons sammons, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gransy, s.r.o. d/b/a subreg.cz (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds that a dominant feature of the mark, namely “VF” is recognisable within the disputed domain
name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the
Policy. ...
2026-01-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Rahul Kumar, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with One.com A/S (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-04-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is John Ekpo, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the Mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-04-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is daniel Silvino, daniel Silvino, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. ...The entirety of both the CVS and CVS HEALTH marks is reproduced within the disputed domain name.
Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the marks for the purposes of the Policy.
...
2025-06-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is ning zeng, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant adds that the
Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name or any corresponding name and is not
making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name.
...
2025-06-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ashley perez, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with One.com A/S (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-03-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Nadison Cherish, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-02-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Nadison Cherish, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-02-03 - Case Details