The Respondent is Juris Kalnins, Latvia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical to its widely known trademark
DAFABET; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and, that
the Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. ...
2024-01-19 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Complainants
The Complainants contend that: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the mark in which the Complainants have rights; (ii) the Respondents have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and (iii) the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2009-06-29 - Case Details
Respondent is keny qwe, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Steinhardt
Sole Panelist
Date: August 4, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
MeridianLink, Inc. v. keny qwe
Case No. D2025-2379
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-08-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Richard Mark, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-09-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Alison Pellizzari Carvalho, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-01-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is mstfi sdaght tlgrd, Iran (Islamic Republic of).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CSL Computer Service Langenbach
GmbH dba Joker.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed
domain name. The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
The Complainant requested that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
...
2023-07-10 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...In relation to the descriptive elements the part of the disputed domain name consisting of the word “swarovski” clearly dominates the disputed domain name. In making the comparison between the trademark and the disputed domain name the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) suffix is usually disregarded. ...
2014-05-27 - Case Details
Second Respondent is in fact controlling the disputed domain name, being the only entity that knows the ID and password necessary for the domain name transference.
...In support of their arguments, Complainants cite a number of decisions made by previous UDRP panels in similar cases, such as one regarding the withholding of a domain name by the former service provider, where the Panel found the registration of the domain name during the contractual relationship in the name of others than the contracting party constitutes bad faith: Nürmont GmbH v. ...
2012-11-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is dysolo Moli, GNNS of Singapore.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“the Domain Name”) is registered with Mat Bao
Corporation (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-07-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is benjamin buell, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Squarespace Domains II LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Souter
Sole Panelist
Date: November 19, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. benjamin buell
Case No. D2024-3967
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-11-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Andy Lewis, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Souter
Sole Panelist
Date: September 26, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Emory University, Emory Healthcare, Inc. v. Andy Lewis
Case No. DCO2024-0054
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-09-30 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration which predate the dates of registration of the disputed domain names by over 90 years.
UDRP panels have consistently held that domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark for purposes of the Policy “when the domain name includes the trademark, or a confusingly similar approximation, regardless of the other terms in the domain name” (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ...It is also established that the addition of generic terms to a disputed domain name has little, if any, effect on a determination of confusing similarity between the domain name and the mark (Quixtar Investments, Inc. v. ...
2013-02-15 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant requests the consolidation of the Complaint against the multiple disputed domain
name registrants pursuant to paragraph 10(e) of the Rules.
The disputed domain name registrants did not comment on the Complainant’s request.
...
2025-10-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard, Inc. / Phillips Taylor, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Given the confusing similarity of the disputed domain name to the Complainant’s trademark and the absence of any relationship between the Respondent and the Complainant, such a use of the disputed domain name is neither a bona fide use nor a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. ...
2021-04-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is M Akkaoui a/k/a Moe Akkaoui of Bankstown, Australia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with AussieHQ Pty Ltd (the "Registrar").
3. ...This text on the website at the Domain Name is also a link to the website's "Contact Us" page. The website at the Domain Name also features a number of advertisements. ...
2014-07-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Thomas Casey, Michigan, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc.
3. ...The fact that the disputed domain name consists entirely or in part of the Complainant's trade marks, renders the disputed domain name identical or confusingly similar to the said trade marks.
...
2009-10-12 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The distinctive part of this Domain Name is the first element, namely ‘mul-t-lock' and the addition of the descriptive term ‘dealer' does not prevent the Domain Name from being confusingly similar to the mark...
2010-07-15 - Case Details
Respondent is Swensom Williams, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Hostinger
Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Annexed to the Complaint are screenshots of the website to which the Domain Name previously resolved.
Currently, the Domain Name resolves to an error page.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. ...
2024-04-11 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...The Complainant alleges that the Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
The Complainant accordingly requests the Panel to order transfer of the disputed domain name.
...
2017-08-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Inert Productions LLC, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Key-Systems GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Consequently, the Panel agrees with the Complainant that it is inconceivable that the Respondent could have registered the disputed domain name without actual knowledge of the Complainant’s rights in the trademark EUROFACTOR.
Finally, it is well established that the use of a domain name as part of a phishing scheme is sufficient evidence of bad faith registration and use under section 4(a)(iii) of the Policy (Accor v. ...
2020-01-03 - Case Details