About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 58600   document(s)s (0.101 sec)

Rows

<<  <  36041 - 36060  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-3604 for atlasglb.com pdf (166 KB)

The Respondent is sana bb, kps, Cambodia. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-11-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-3971 for pomegranatelinens.com pdf (154 KB)

Respondent is Vicki Garcia, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...Complainant Complainant contends that (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainants’ trademarks, (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and (iii) Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. ...

2025-12-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-1389 for noseparis-fr.com pdf (137 KB)

The Respondent is GGray Jason, United States of America (“United States”) 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...O'Farrell Sole Panelist Date: May 27, 2024 ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION NOSE v. GGray Jason Case No. D2024-1389 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 4. ...

2024-05-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4435 for heetswala.com pdf (140 KB)

The Respondent is Tapan Sahni, United Arab Emirates (“UAE”). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Hughes Sole Panelist Date: December 21, 2023 https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/ ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Philip Morris Products S.A. v. Tapan Sahni Case No. D2023-4435 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 4. ...

2024-01-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0632 for vitogaz-distribution.com pdf (162 KB)

The Respondent is Ashley perez, United Kingdom. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with One.com A/S (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-03-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-2536 for michelinmyleaveproservice.com html (10 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...The Complainant alleges that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, in particular that, so far as the Complainant is aware, the Respondent is not generally known by the disputed domain name, and the Complainant has not authorized the Respondent to use its MICHELIN trademark in connection with registration of a domain name, or otherwise. ...

2021-10-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DRO2014-0005 for blablacar.ro html (11 KB)

The Respondent is Odobescu Adrian of Bucharest, Romania. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with ROTLD (the "Registry"). 3. ...Complainant The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical to its trademark BLABLACAR, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name and the Respondent registered and uses the disputed domain name in bad faith. ...

2014-09-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1108 for valiumwithoutaprescription.org html (9 KB)

The Respondent is Stanislav Cernevic of Kaunas, Lithuania. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2012-08-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2001-0635 for aarcorp.net html (10 KB)

Singh Dha with an address of 531 Barking Road, Eastham, London, England.   2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is . The registrar is CORE Internet Council of Registrars. ...Discussion and Findings Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy requires the Complainant to prove that: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; (iii) the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. ...

2001-07-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-2483 for clearbank.net html (10 KB)

The Respondent is Mark Mayo of Manila, Philippines, self-represented. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2019-02-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-2262 for legomask.com html (10 KB)

The Respondent is Shahin Masoum, Iran (Islamic Republic of). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Openprovider (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The requirements outlined in Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ASD, Inc., WIPO Case No. D2001-0903 are not met in the current case. The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...

2019-11-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-0842 for pricipal.com html (10 KB)

Registrations Aktien Gesellschaft of Kingstown, Saint Vincent And The Grenadines. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the "Registrar"). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint and the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). ...

2016-06-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-1219 for newbalanceholding.com pdf (141 KB)

Respondent is “James DAVIS”, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with IONOS SE (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-06-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-3772 for amandaghost.com, amandaghost.net, amandaghostsucks.com, realamandaghost.com pdf (178 KB)

Respondent is Name Redacted.1 2. The Domain Names and Registrars The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...With respect to the Domain Name , the Complaint is denied. /Robert A. Badgley/ Robert A. Badgley Sole Panelist Date: December 7, 2024 ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Amanda Gosein-Cameron p/k/a Amanda Ghost v. ...

2024-12-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-1594 for flamp.com html (24 KB)

The Complainant refers to the negotiations between the Parties for the transfer of the disputed domain name. As discussed by the panel in Barlow Lyde & Gilbert v. The Business Law Group, WIPO Case No. ...Futureworld Consultancy (Pty) Ltd. v. Online advice, WIPO Case No. D2003-0297. That standard is not met in this case. In this case, the Complainant has valid rights in the FLAMP trademark, and the Respondent has no trademark rights in a designation resembling the disputed domain name and does not appear to actively use the website at the disputed domain name. ...

2015-11-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-2475 for balsamo-de-tigre.com, baume-du-tigre.boutique, baume-du-tigre.info, baume-du-tigre.online, baume-tigre.net, baume-tigre.org, baumedutigre.boutique, baumedutigre.online, baumedutigre.org, boutique-baume-du-tigre.com, tiger-balsam.com html (32 KB)

There are a number of factual considerations at play in this analysis. Firstly, the panel notes that the disputed domain names themselves do not include any distinguishing elements. Nothing in the disputed domain names “signals that the domain name may be owned and operated by a third party” (See The Macallen Distillers Limited v. ...Yet, Respondents apparently transferred this domain name for a nominal amount to Complainant upon request: conduct that is not consistent with a registrant determined to corner the market in related domain names, at least in terms of what happened in 2010, (See Assembled Products Corporation v. ...

2020-02-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-0891 for ibmglobal.vip pdf (137 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) v. Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc. Case No. D2025-0891 1. The Parties The Complainant is International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), United States of America, internally represented. The Respondent is Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc., Cyprus. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Communigal Communications Ltd. ...

2025-05-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-4148 for dripdropcom.com pdf (139 KB)

Carey, Grant Carey- Yerac Strategic Soltions, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Discussion and Findings Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy lists the three elements which Complainant must satisfy with respect to the Domain Name: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and (iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. ...

2025-12-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-2189 for reynobond.net html (14 KB)

Respondent is Toloo Trading, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with 1API GmbH (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Such a use cannot support a finding of rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name (see WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.13.1 and cases cited). Once Complainant has made out a prima facie case under paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy showing that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name, the burden of production shifts to Respondent (see, for example, L’Oréal v. ...

2019-11-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-1199 for ropesgray-llp.com html (14 KB)

The Respondent is Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC, United States / Scott Hebert, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (“Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Wild West Domains, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Multiple previous panels have found that the addition of “llp” to a disputed domain name does nothing to alleviate confusing similarity. See, e.g., Sidley Austin LLP v. Domain Administrator, See PrivacyGuardian.org / Bien, Bien Tran, WIPO Case No. ...

2021-06-17 - Case Details