Respondent is Uzihcv Zexlpl, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...Complainant indicates that there is no evidence of Respondent’s use of the disputed domain name in
connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services and that, to the best of its knowledge, Respondent
is not commonly known by the disputed domain name and is not making a legitimate noncommercial or fair
use of the disputed domain name. ...
2025-07-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Victor Moore, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-01-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mohammad Reza Georgian doz, Hungary.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH
dba Joker.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent is not known by the disputed domain
name. There is no bona fide offering of goods or services as the disputed domain name is passively held.
...
2025-10-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is Lisa Bells, The Arena, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name SRS AB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-11-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is MOLTER TRENTON, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name.
Accordingly, the disputed domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-10-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Igor shanska, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Further, the entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-09-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Vladimir Ivanov, Kosovo1.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name also differs from the
domain name used for the official website by only the Top-Level Domain “.br”.
...
2024-07-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Eric Mikovich, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainants operate a website using the domain name .
The Domain Name was registered on April 8, 2024. The Domain Name is not associated with a website. ...
2024-07-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is hasnain ashraf, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-06-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sarah Kowalczyk, Moelis, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“the Domain Name”) is registered with Key-Systems GmbH (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy lists the three elements which the Complainant must satisfy with respect to the
Domain Name:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the
Complainant has rights; and
(ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered or is being used in bad faith.
...
2024-05-08 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
As stated in many decisions rendered under the Policy (see Robert Ellenbogen v. Mike Pearson,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0001), the Complainant must show that:
- the disputed domain name was registered by the Respondent in bad faith, and
- the disputed domain name is being used by the Respondent in bad faith
The Respondent used in the present case a privacy and proxy registration service; this however does not prevent panels from assessing a case under the UDRP elements. ...
2019-10-21 - Case Details
Respondent is Jhon Guptha, Integrify Solutions, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Casey
Sole Panelist
Date: January 2, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Discover Financial Services v. Jhon Guptha, Integrify Solutions
Case No. D2023-4494
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-01-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Davi Newman, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 1API GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-03-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Marzena Zytka, Choszczno, Poland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue, , is registered with CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH dba Joker.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2008-08-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is qiang ma, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CloudFlare, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint the formal requirements of the .IO Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for .IO Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO
Supplemental Rules for .IO Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2026-01-26 - Case Details
Respondent is Deepak Chauhan, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy lists the three elements which Complainant must satisfy with respect to the
Domain Name:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which
Complainant has rights; and
(ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2025-11-26 - Case Details
Respondent is Suhail Mirza, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com,
LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant operates a commercial website at the domain name , and also owns the
domain name , which domain name is redirected to Complainant’s main website.
...
2023-01-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Darrell Strickland, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Eranet International Limited
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-08-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is swarovski-earrings-sale.com of Dublin, Ireland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Web Commerce Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2013-12-19 - Case Details
Preliminary Issue – Multiple Domain Names
The Panel notes that the present Complaint has consolidated five domain name disputes.
According to paragraph 10(e) of the Rules, the Panel has the power to consolidate multiple domain name disputes.
...The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s primary domain name ; the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complaint’s career website ; the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s customer service subdomain .
...
2021-11-01 - Case Details