The Respondents are WhoisGuard Protected / WhoisGuard, Inc., Panama and Mohamed Barrouchi and Red Communications Studio, Morocco.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...According to prior UDRP panel decisions, it is sufficient that the complainant shows prima facie that the respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name in order to shift the burden of production to the respondent (see Croatia Airlines d.d. v. Modern Empire Internet Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2020-06-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Service Provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Endywork Mode,
United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
...The Domain Name was registered on July 27, 2021. The Domain Name resolved to a website (the
“Website”), on which the Registrar indicates that the Domain Name is parked for free, and links to third-party
websites are included. ...
2022-07-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Macmillan, Jennifer Tate, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Domain Name”) is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu. ...Such conduct is deceptive, illegal, and in previous UDRP decisions has been found to be evidence of registration and use in bad faith, see The Coca-Cola Company v. Marcus Steiner,
WIPO Case No. D2012-1804. The Panel finds that the Respondent is using the Domain Name in bad faith.
...
2021-09-29 - Case Details
Respondent is High Liner, High Liner, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GMO Internet, Inc. d/b/a
Discount-Domain.com and Onamae.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Priority for the oldest MASTEC registration
dates to 1998, decades before Respondent registered the disputed domain name. Complainant also owns
and operates the domain name .
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. ...
2024-09-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is wang lao, Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name be cancelled.
/Moonchul Chang/
Moonchul Chang
Sole Panelist
Date: July 4, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Sanofi v. wang lao
Case No. ...
2024-07-19 - Case Details
Rights or Legitimate Interests
Under paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy, the complainant must make at least a prima facie showing that the respondent possesses no rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name (Malayan Banking Berhad v. Beauty, Success & Truth International,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1393). ...Moreover, under Paragraph 1 of the Rules Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (“RDNH”) is defined as “using the Policy in bad faith to attempt to deprive the registered domain name holder of a domain name.”
...
2019-01-04 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Moreover, the Respondent has previously registered at least one other domain name incorporating the BRAUN trademark (see The Procter & Gamble Company and Braun GmbH v. Domain Admin, FBS INC, Whoisprotection.biz / Erol Çakir, supra). ...
2021-02-02 - Case Details
Respondent is Jenifer caruso, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
...The Panel finds the Mark is recognizable within the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Domain Name is
confusingly similar to the Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-03-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is xia xiu, yutmnhgbd, Christmas Island, Australia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-10-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tito Laholla, Tito Lmt, Peru.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Realtime Register B.V. ...The entirety of the DREW mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-03-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ishwar Kumar, Ishwar Kumar, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DreamHost, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent is using the disputed domain name in bad faith, as it is not possible to conceive of any
plausible actual or contemplated use of the disputed domain name that would not be illegitimate.
...
2025-05-15 - Case Details
Respondent is zilong zhao, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo, LLC
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...Badgley
Sole Panelist
Date: February 3, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Dansko, LLC v. zilong zhao
Case No. D2024-5067
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-02-07 - Case Details
Respondent is Kelly Barr, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Complainant notes that the disputed
domain name includes an additional letter “s” after “energy” that does not change the overall impression of
the disputed domain name and only serves to increase the likelihood of confusion associated with the
disputed domain name.
...
2024-12-17 - Case Details
Respondent is Michael Jin, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-09-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mugira James, Uganda.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-11-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is OrlandoAnderson, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the NOBODY’S CHILD mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly,
the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy.
...
2024-11-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tim Parsonson, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name
contains the Complainant’s mark in its entirety with additional letters – “l” and “s” – and as the letter “l” has a
similar appearance to the letter “i” that it follows, and as the letter “s” is placed at the end of the disputed
domain name, the disputed domain name remains confusingly similar when viewed in a side-by-side
comparison. ...
2024-11-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Irina Zenenkova, Kazakhstan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Therefore, the Complainant submits that the disputed domain name has been registered to commercially
profit from the likelihood of confusion between the OPTIBET Trademarks and the disputed domain name.
...
2024-08-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is David Lily, Philippines.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <1xbet.zone> is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-08-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jordan Cole, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Web Commerce Communications
Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-07-15 - Case Details