The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Rights or Legitimate Interests
Complainant has the burden of proving that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names. National Construction Rentals, Inc. v. Toilets.com, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0147. If Complainant satisfies this burden, then the burden of production shifts to Respondent, who must demonstrate rights or legitimate interests, by showing:
(i) before any notice to you of the dispute, your use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the domain name or a name corresponding to the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services; or
(ii) you (as an individual, business, or other organization) have been commonly known by the domain name, even if you have acquired no trademark or service mark rights; or
(iii) you are making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name, without intent for commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers or to tarnish the trademark or service mark at issue.
...
2011-01-21 - Case Details
California, United States of America represented by Fenwick & West, LLP of United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.
3. ...There are 54 listings for “LMC” on the “Acronym Finder” website alone.
The Policy requires that a domain name be both registered and used by the respondent in bad faith (see e-Dunction, Inc. v. John Zuccarini, d/b/a The Cupcake Party & Cupcake Movies,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-10-14 - Case Details
It is well recognized by UDRP panels that where a distinctive trademark is wholly incorporated in a domain name, a geographic term typically will not serve to distinguish the domain name from the trademark (see, for example, the discussion Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v. ...Thirdly, there is the fact that Equipmed’s own domain name is held in an almost identical manner to the disputed domain name. Fourthly, there is a specific mention of Equipmed on the website associated with the disputed domain name. ...
2016-08-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Perfect Privacy, LLC, United States of America (“United States”) / Milen Radumilo,
Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with SNAPNAMES, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name has active MX records, suggesting it is likely
that the Respondent intended to create email addresses at the disputed domain name and use them.
...
2022-09-26 - Case Details
Respondent is Ralph Moran, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (hereinafter “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
Web Commerce Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Nodine
Sole Panelist
Date: February 28, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Frankie Shop LLC v. Ralph Moran
Case No. D2025-0126
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-03-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Hendra Hendra, P.T Asli Rancangan Indonesia, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.13.1.
While the disputed domain name consists of two common terms, the nature of the website at the disputed
domain name, including a close copy of the Complainant’s logo, shows that the Respondent registered the
disputed domain name with the purpose of illicitly targeting the Complainant. ...
2025-09-15 - Case Details
Respondent is Tammy P Bailey, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Steinhardt
Sole Panelist
Date: November 11, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Reggio Register Company, LLC v. Tammy P Bailey
Case No. D2025-3879
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
5. ...
2025-11-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jennifer Kaiser of Bad Birnbach, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-03-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ahmed Syed, AdvertisingPulse, India (hereinafter, “Respondent”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is
registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint (hereinafter, “the Complaint”)
satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or
“UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO
Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-03-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Visiotex S.A. with an address at 1250 Hallandale Blvd # 502, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33009, USA.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is . The domain name registrar is Network Solutions, Inc.
3. ...On February 7, 2001, the Center verified that the Complaint satisfies the formal requirements of the ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules") and the Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2001-03-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Raione Santos Reis, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...Following a formal complaint to the Registrar, the disputed domain name was suspended. At the time of the
Decision, the disputed domain name does not resolve to an active website.
5. ...
2025-01-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Burmann Boris, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name has
been inactive more than three years when the last publication on the disputed domain name was made
onMarch 3, 2021. ...
2024-07-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Rahul Sharma, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with One.com A/S (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant also owns and operates the website under the domain name since August 30, 2000.
The disputed domain name was registered on July 31, 2019.
5. ...
2019-12-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Clive Marshall, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Internet Domain Service BS Corp (the
“Registrar”).
3. .../Luca Barbero/
Luca Barbero
Sole Panelist
Date: July 27, 2022
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Fly Go Voyager SRL v. Clive Marshall
Case No. D2022-2162
The disputed domain name was registered on May 3, 1999, and is pointed to a website currently offering on sale the disputed domain name for USD 19,995.
...
2022-08-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is 帆 钱, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Christie
Sole Panelist
Date: March 23, 2023
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Skims Body, Inc. v. 帆 钱
Case No. D2023-0454
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2023-03-30 - Case Details
The disputed domain name is registered with Cosmotown, Inc (the “Registrar”).
The disputed domain name is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Lastly, the Complainant informs the Panel that the Respondent was recently involved in a UDRP case (Philip
Morris Products S.A. v. Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot / Bobbi Kontozoglou, WIPO Case No.
D2022-1468) concerning the domain name and contends that this shows a pattern of
bad faith conduct in connection with domain names incorporating the Complainant’s trademarks.
...
2023-08-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Online Hubs, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Notably, the Complainant contends that:
- The disputed domain name is identical to the Trade Mark. The disputed domain name consists
entirely of the Trade Mark. ...
2025-09-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Asad Qyoom, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc., (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Souter
Sole Panelist
Date: March 22, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Get Weird, LLC v. Asad Qyoom
Case No. DCO2024-0003
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-03-28 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...It is well-established in decisions under the UDRP that the addition of non-distinctive and descriptive elements to an established trade mark is insufficient to avoid a finding of confusing similarity between the complainant’s trade mark and the disputed domain name (the decision in F. Porsche AG v. Glenn Stefan Karlsson-Springare,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1727 and many others). ...
2013-07-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Michael Kennedy of Farnborough, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent’s web content, posted after the “cease and desist” letter had been sent, was designed to justify the Respondent’s registration of the disputed domain name. See Sportingbet Plc, Internet Opportunity Entertainment (Sports) Limited v. Rough Media,
WIPO Case No. ...
2012-08-08 - Case Details