The Panel therefore finds that the disputed domain name was registered in bad faith.
The disputed domain name does not currently resolve to an active website. However, as first stated
in Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows, WIPO Case No. D2000-0003, and repeated in
many subsequent decisions under the UDRP: “the concept of a domain name ‘being used in bad faith’ is not
limited to positive action; inaction is within the concept. ...
2022-07-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is duke odili, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-03-08 - Case Details
The Complainant asserts that the Respondent is not identified in the WhoIs database as the disputed
domain name and that past panels have held that a Respondent was not commonly known by a disputed
domain name if the WhoIs information was not similar to the disputed domain name.
...Finally, the Complainant notes that the disputed domain name has been set up with MX records which it
says means that the disputed domain name may be actively used for email purposes. ...
2023-05-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisProtector Inc., WhoisProtector osrammiddleeast.com /WhoisProtector Inc., Dom Reg (), of Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with DomainPeople, Inc. ...Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003.
In the circumstances, the Panel finds that the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
7. ...
2013-06-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is NA, Luca Mueller, Unterfoehring, Bavaria, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with About Domain Dot Com Solutions Pvt. ...“Use which intentionally trades on the fame of another cannot constitute a “bona fide” offering of goods and services” – see Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847.
The Panel therefore finds that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name.
...
2010-05-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Administrator, United States of America (“U.S.”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the Disputed Domain Name. Accordingly, the Disputed
Domain Name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-08-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Yang Xiao Yuan of Shaoyang, Hunan, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with West263 International Limited (the "Registrar").
3. ...Moreover, mere registration does not create any rights or legitimate interests, as stated before in Pharmacia & Upjohn Company v. Moreonline,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0134, "mere registration does not establish rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name". ...
2018-09-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jeff Glazer, Blue Chip Media Pty Limited, Australia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Crazy Domains FZ-LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...However, as first stated in Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003, and repeated in many subsequent decisions under the UDRP: “the concept of a domain name ‘being used in bad faith’ is not limited to positive action; inaction is within the concept. ...
2019-09-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC, United States of America / Jugrawute Thongsiriratna, Thailand.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint, together with the amended Complaint, satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-12-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Edson Sanchez of Districo Federal, Mexico, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...This is not bona fide pursuant to UDRP jurisprudence (see Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ASD, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0903).
With respect to paragraph 4(c)(ii) of the Policy, there is no evidence that indicates that the Respondent has ever been commonly known by the disputed domain name.
...
2013-08-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is ASDAQ.com, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with BulkRegister.com.
3. ...It is thus apt
to confuse consumers (see e.g. Inter-IKEA Systems B.V. v. Evezon Co. Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0437, ).
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Respondent has defaulted and thus provided no evidence of any legitimate right or interest in the domain name. ...
2004-07-08 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...See, Lilly ICOS LIC v. John
Hopking/Neo net Ltd, WIPO Case No. D2005-0694
(Annex 10, C); and other WIPO Domain Name cases (Annex 10, D, E, F, G, and H).
...
2006-10-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is SABRI MOHAMED, Morocco.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the Complainant’s trademark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly,
the disputed domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-07-21 - Case Details
Respondent is Sharon Smith, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Porkbun LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...That domain name is not at issue in this proceeding.
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
The Southern Company v. ...
2025-10-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Berry Lamy, Happy Homes Florida Real Estate LLC, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Domain Name has resolved to a blank
webpage. MX records are configured for the Domain Name, allowing for creation of email addresses.
5. ...
2024-06-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Matt Wade, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Respondent’s use of the disputed domain name to impersonate the Complainant
shows that it registered the disputed domain name with the intention of fraudulently procuring the wiring of
money. ...
2023-08-24 - Case Details
Respondent is Harish Gonthina, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name incorporates the IBM trademark in its entirety. Numerous UDRP panels have recognized that incorporating a trademark in its entirety can be sufficient to establish that the disputed domain name is at least confusingly similar to a registered trademark (see e.g., PepsiCo, Inc. v. ...
2020-09-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Andreou Panayiotis of Nicosia, Cyprus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH dba Joker.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2013-05-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kenn Lee of Shanghai, the People’s Republic of China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc.
3. ...On March 8, 2011, the Center issued a decision regarding the same Complainant with respect to a different disputed domain name . See G&P Net S.p.A. v. Kenn Lee,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0122. The Respondent in that case was also a Mr. ...
2011-05-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ling Shun Shing, of Shanghai, China ("the Respondent").
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name ("the domain name") is registered with iHoldings.com Inc. d/b/a DotRegistrar.com ("the Registrar").
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2003-06-13 - Case Details