About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 57807   document(s)s (0.055 sec)

Rows

<<  <  47301 - 47320  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-1632 for mercedes-benz.autos pdf (136 KB)

page 3 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate Interests C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision...

2025-06-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-0711 for fastlycdn.com pdf (159 KB)

Notably, the Complainant contends that: (i) The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Mark. The Complainant submits that the domain name incorporates the entirety of the Mark and adds the term “cdn”, which the Complainant states is a commonly used abbreviation for “content delivery network”, a service the Complainant offers and which its trade mark registrations cover. ...If you want I can transfer the domain name to you.” 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...

2025-04-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-0764 for equifaxclaim.com pdf (144 KB)

Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the f irst element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate Interests C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision...

2025-04-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-1617 for sodexo.baby pdf (151 KB)

Discussion and Findings The Panel shall now proceed to the analysis of the evidence in this case and shall decide if the Complainant has satisfied the three elements of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate Interests C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision...

2025-06-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-0787 for possinieurodesignlamp.com pdf (144 KB)

Respondent Respondent did not reply to Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate Interests C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision...

2025-05-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-0754 for shamrockfoodscorp.com pdf (151 KB)

Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate Interests C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision...

2025-05-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-1280 for sapjp.com pdf (141 KB)

In any case, the Respondent did not reply at all in the merit of the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate Interests C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision...

2025-06-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAE2025-0005 for lestoises.ae pdf (140 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate Interests C. Registered or Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision...

2025-05-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2906 for amgen.space pdf (139 KB)

The onus of proving these elements is on the Complainant. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the f irst element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate Interests C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision...

2025-09-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-4148 for dripdropcom.com pdf (139 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel concludes that Complainant has rights in the trademarks DRIP DROP and DRIPDROP through registration and use demonstrated in the record. The Panel also concludes that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to those marks. The Domain Name is comprised of Complainant’s marks plus the letters “com.” ...

2025-12-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0821 for lacentrale.live pdf (166 KB)

Discussion and Findings In accordance with paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, the Complainant must prove that each of the three following elements is satisfied: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the trademarks or service marks in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and (iii) the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...

2024-04-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-1304 for sta-sa.online pdf (145 KB)

page 3 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the f irst element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate Interests C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision...

2024-06-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DPH2024-0002 for alibaba.ph pdf (141 KB)

Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate Interests C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision...

2024-05-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0419 for accenturelogisticschain.com pdf (141 KB)

Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate Interests C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision...

2024-04-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0234 for arcelorgroup.com pdf (141 KB)

Complainant The Complainant contends that: a) The Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights. The addition of the generic term “group” does not change the overall impression of the designation as being connected to the Complainant’s trademark. ...As such, the Panel finds that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the ARCELOR trademark. The first limb of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is thus established. ...

2024-04-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0959 for raineinvestment.com pdf (139 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that Complainant holds rights in the trademark RAINE through registration and use demonstrated in the record. The Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the RAINE mark. The Domain Name entirely incorporates the RAINE mark, and adds the word “investment”, which does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity under the first element. ...

2024-04-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0536 for hyzon.com pdf (139 KB)

Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate Interests C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision...

2024-04-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0909 for geico.dev pdf (144 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant contends that the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name incorporating the GEICO trademark, in which the Complainant has trademark rights per paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy. ...Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate Interests C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision...

2024-05-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0922 for fatface.online pdf (148 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate Interests C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision...

2024-05-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0768 for galgotiasuniversity.com pdf (194 KB)

page 3 Under paragraph 15(a) of the Rules, “[a] Panel shall decide a complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted and in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that it deems applicable”. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar B. Rights or Legitimate Interests C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith 7. Decision...

2024-05-07 - Case Details

/contact/en/area.jsp?area=arbitration https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/ https://www.wipo.int/tools/en/disclaim.html https://www.wipo.int/en/web/privacy-policy/ https://www.wipo.int/en/web/accessibility/ https://www.wipo.int/tools/en/sitemap.html https://www3.wipo.int/newsletters/en/ https://www.wipo.int/en/web/podcasts/ https://www.wipo.int/news/en/