Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s rights since it integrates the BIOMERIEUX trademark in its entirety and the BIOMÉRIEUX trademark almost in its entirety. ...Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated it owns registered trademark rights in the BIOMERIEUX mark and that no other entity has rights or uses the mark. ...
2020-02-18 - Case Details
Petitioner
The disputed domain name is nearly identical and confusingly similar to the Petitioner’s RAKUTEN mark.
The disputed domain name incorporates RAKUTEN mark, in which the Petitioner has exclusive rights.
...Consequently, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Petitioner’s RAKUTEN Mark.
C. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Policy requires the Petitioner to prove that the Holder has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2020-03-25 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Domain Name incorporates trademark ESTEE LAUDER in its entirety. This is sufficient to establish confusing similarity (Magnum Piering, Inc. v. ...D2002-0122).
The Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the ESTEE LAUDER mark in which the Complainant and Complainant’s group has rights.
...
2020-05-07 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Domain Name incorporates Complainant’s trademark WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT in its entirety. ...D2002-0122).
The Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT mark of Complainant.
Complainant has established Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i).
...
2020-05-06 - Case Details
With respect to the elements of its claim under the Policy, the Complainant first submits that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its registered trademark. The Domain Name wholly incorporates the BITRISE trademark, and, according to the Complainant, the addition of the Top-Level Domain (“TLD”) “.club” does nothing to eliminate the confusing similarity.
...Paragraph 4(b) of the Policy sets out illustrative circumstances that could demonstrate registration and use of a domain name in bad faith for purposes of paragraph 4(a)(iii) above.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Domain Name wholly incorporates the Complainant’s BITRISE trademark, with the mere addition of the “.club” TLD. ...
2020-01-29 - Case Details
According to the Complainant, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar with the Complainant’s trademark only differing by the addition of the “-” between the elements MILLE and MIGLIA which is insufficient to add distinctiveness thereto.
...The Complainant must prove in this administrative proceeding that each of the aforesaid three elements is present in order to obtain the transfer of the disputed domain name.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established rights in the MILLE MIGLIA trademark, duly registered in several countries around the world (Annex 4 to the Complaint).
...
2020-04-28 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Once the gTLD “.online” is ignored (which is appropriate in this case), the disputed domain name consists of the whole of the Complainant’s registered word trademark SKECHERS followed by the letters “uk”. ...Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Respondent is not a licensee of, or otherwise affiliated with, the Complainant, and has not been authorized by the Complainant to use its SKECHERS trademark. ...
2020-04-24 - Case Details
The Domain Name is identical to the Mark, and the Top-Level Domain (“TLD”) “.eu” should be disregarded in considering confusing similarity. Therefore, the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s Mark.
Under the second element, Complainant asserts that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name because it is not commonly known by that name, nor is Respondent authorized, licensed or otherwise allowed by Complainant to use the Mark nor to register such a domain name. ...Discussion and Findings
Under paragraph B(11)(d)(1) of the ADR Rules, in order for the Complaint to succeed, it is for Complainant to establish:
(i) that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right is recognized or established by the national law of a Member State and/or European Union law and; either
(ii) that the Domain Name has been registered by Respondent without rights or legitimate interest in the name; or
(iii) that the Domain Name has been registered or is being used in bad faith.
...
2020-01-20 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Mark, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration.
...
2019-11-22 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant claims that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights. The disputed domain name incorporates the Complainant’s mark with the omission of the “&” sign and the addition of the generic term “asset”. ...This dispute resolution procedure is accepted by the domain name registrant as a condition of registration.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
According to the file the Complainant has demonstrated registered rights in the W&W trademark. ...
2019-12-20 - Case Details
Complainant
The disputed domain name reproduces the highly distinctive AMBIEN trademark in its entirety.
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the AMBIEN trademark despite the addition of the generic term “pharma” and the extension “.com”.
...Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated it owns registered trademark rights in the AMBIEN trademark throughout the world. ...
2020-01-08 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant is the owner of the trademark CELLNEX both by registration and acquired reputation and that the disputed domain name is identical to the trademark CELLNEX.
...The Panel finds that the Complainant has therefore met its burden of proving that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark, pursuant to the Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i).
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Respondent has failed to file a response in accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5.
...
2021-11-09 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel concludes that Complainant has rights in the trademark THE BUSINESS DOCTOR through registration demonstrated in the record. The Panel also concludes that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to that mark. The lack of the word “the” is inconsequential, and the addition of the geographically descriptive initials “nj” (here for North Jersey) does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity between the Domain Name and Complainant’s registered trademark, which remains recognizable within the Domain Name.
...
2021-11-08 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has demonstrated rights through registration and use on the INSTAGRAM mark.
...D2002-0122).
The Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the INSTAGRAM mark of Complainant.
Complainant has established the Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i).
...
2021-11-03 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Mark; the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration.
...
2021-12-10 - Case Details
In accordance with paragraph 14(a) of the Rules, if the Respondent does not submit a Response, in the absence of exceptional circumstances, the Panel shall decide the dispute based upon the Complaint.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established rights over the DPD trademark.
The disputed domain name reproduces the Complainant’s trademark in its entirety, with the addition of the term “exps”. ...For the reasons above, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a nonexclusive list of circumstances that may indicate the Respondent’s rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2021-12-09 - Case Details
The Respondent did not submit a formal Response.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
First of all, the Panel finds that the Complainant has provided evidence that it has prior rights in the VEEPEE Trademark.
...Consequently, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s Trademark. The first element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is thus fulfilled.
...
2022-02-22 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Mark; the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration.
...
2022-01-20 - Case Details
It says that the disputed domain name is therefore confusingly similar to its INNISFREE mark.
The Complainant also asserts that it has not authorised or permitted the Respondent to register the disputed domain name and that the Complainant’s rights in the INNISFREE mark predate the registration of the disputed domain name. ...Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns registered trade mark rights in Vietnamese trade mark registration 35428 for INNISFREE registered on November 13, 2000. ...
2022-01-11 - Case Details
Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration.
...The Panel therefore finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Trade Mark and that the Complainant has satisfied paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2022-01-11 - Case Details