The record shows that the disputed domain name has been used to display links to third party webpages including links composed using the terms “Top Bank List”, “Bank Account Routing Number”, “1st Bank Services”, “Top Private Banks”, “One United Bank”, “Online Mutual Funds”, “Start-Up Business Funding”, “Curacao Online”, “Luxembourg Online”, “Online Banken”, “LU Online”, “ING Bank Online”, and “Services”.
...Specifically, links displayed at the disputed domain name have included “Top Bank List”, “Bank Account Routing Number”, “1st Bank Services”, “Top Private Banks”, “One United Bank”, “Online Mutual Funds”, “Start-Up Business Funding”, “Curacao Online”, “Luxembourg Online”, “Online Banken”, “LU Online”, “ING Bank Online”, and “Services”. ...
2019-10-17 - Case Details
Domaincar c/o Perthshire Marketing a/k/a Domaincar, NAF Claim No. 671079; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc and The Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited v. Yorgi Brawn, NAF Claim No. 787945; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc v. ...Jim Bowen, NAF Claim No. 1045991; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc v. Ramzi Takch, NAF Claim No. 1106036; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc v. ...
2012-11-09 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is a federally supervised retail bank headquartered in San Francisco, California, USA. It is the successor to a California bank established in the 19th Century, which merged to form Union Bank of California in 1996, known as UnionBanCal. ...William Bookout,
WIPO Case No. DME2014-0008 ("MUFG Union Bank I"). That domain name resolves to a substantially similar website headed "Union Bank". Three other domain names are at issue in yet another WIPO UDRP proceeding between the same parties, MUFG Union Bank, N.A. v. ...
2014-12-18 - Case Details
u) On July 30, 2001, Mr. Kulenkampff wrote a letter to Rothschild Bank AG of Zurich in the following terms:-
"I confirm that I was previously employed by Rothschild Bank AG. ...Given that the Complainant’s reputation to the general public is that of a bank, the addition to "rothschild" of the word "bank" is purely descriptive of the Complainant’s well-known activity. ...
2001-10-08 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Oney Bank v. 杨智超 (Zhi Chao Yang)
Case No. D2023-0968
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Oney Bank, France, represented by SafeBrands, France.
...The Complainant has provided evidence that it owns the ONEY and ONEY BANK trade marks. The
disputed domain name contains the Complainant’s ONEY and ONEY BANK marks in their entirety, and
these marks are recognizable. ...
2023-04-28 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
IndusInd Bank Limited v. DomainCA (Whois Protect Service) / Yungu Jo
Case No. D2014-0811
1. The Parties
The Complainant is IndusInd Bank Limited of Mumbai, India, represented by SNG & Partners, India.
...Factual Background
The Complainant is a Scheduled Commercial Bank in India and has been providing banking and financial services under the name “IndusInd Bank Limited.” ...
2014-08-06 - Case Details
Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI
Decisión del Grupo de Expertos
Bank of America Corporation v. Sun Qifeng
Caso No. DMX2020-0001
1. Las Partes
La Promovente es Bank of America Corporation, Estados Unidos de América (los “Estados Unidos”), representada por Legarreta y Asociados, México.
...La Promovente es titular, entre otros, de los siguientes registros de marca en México:
Marca
Número de Registro
Fecha de Registro
Clase
BANK OF AMERICA
188901
29 de abril de 1975
36
U.S. TRUST BANK OF AMERICA PRIVATE WEALTH MANAGEMENT (Y DISEÑO)
1141563
4 de febrero de 2010
36
BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH SETTING OPPORTUNITY IN MOTION (Y DISEÑO)
1232884
12 de agosto de 2011
36
BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH TRADE PRO (Y DISEÑO)
1256520
7 de diciembre de 2011
36
BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH THE POWER OF GLOBAL CONNECTIONS (Y DISEÑO)
1413358
26 de noviembre de 2013
36
BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH MERCURY
1460743
5 de junio de 2014
9
La Promovente es titular del nombre de dominio registrado el 28 de diciembre de 1998, así como de los nombres de dominio y registrados el 14 de septiembre de 2008.
...
2020-04-16 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant acts as central bank, corporate bank, and parent holding company of the DZ BANK Group. As a central bank, the Complainant serves as the subsidiary partner of about 850 local cooperative banks. ...The Complainant has provided evidence of rights in the DZ BANK trademarks, which enjoy protection through numerous registrations.
The Complainant has registered, inter alia, the following trademarks:
- DZ BANK (word), European Union Trademark No. 004994133, registered on July 26, 2007;
- DZ BANK BANK ON GERMANY (word), European Union Trademark No. 006813224, registered on February 6, 2009; and
- DZ BANK (word), International Trade Mark No. 781223, registered on November 13, 2001.
...
2021-02-03 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Dollar Bank, Federal Savings Bank v. Liu Yuan
Case No. D2016-0455
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Dollar Bank, Federal Savings Bank of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America, represented by Metz Lewis Brodman Must O'Keefe LLC, United States of America.
...Factual Background
The Complainant is a United States bank corporation and owns United States trademark registration nos 3539973 and 3562865 for DOLLAR BANK and DOLLARBANK.COM respectively. ...
2016-05-30 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Tesco Personal Finance pIc t/a Tesco Bank v. TES Cooperative Bank / Tong Lei
Case No. D2012-0110
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Tesco Personal Finance pIc t/a Tesco Bank of Edinburgh, Great Britain and Northern Ireland represented by Brodies LLP of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
...According to the Complainant, the addition of the work “bank” does not dispel such confusing similarity, as the TESCO mark is registered for and has been used with banking and financial services for many years, even though the Complainant was not formally rebranded as TESCO BANK until October 2009.
...
2012-03-30 - Case Details
First, the Complainant contends that it has rights in and to the ZIONS and ZIONS BANK trademarks.
Second, the Complainant argues that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the ZIONS and
ZIONS BANK trademarks owned by the Complainant because the Disputed Domain Name incorporates the
Complainant’s ZIONS and ZIONS BANK trademarks in its entirety. ...First, the Complainant argues that the Respondent should have been aware of the Complainant’s ZIONS
and ZIONS BANK trademarks as the Respondent registered the Disputed Domain Name that comprises the
ZIONS and ZIONS BANK trademarks which are distinct and widely known through being used in commerce
for at least 132 years.
...
2022-12-01 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
ABSA Bank Limited v. Domain ID Shield Service / Roy Chika, Roy Chika Investment
Case No. D2018-1363
1. The Parties
Complainant is ABSA Bank Limited of Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa, represented by Moore Attorneys Incorporated, South Africa.
...Respondent registered the disputed domain name in 2015, long after the ABSA marks and ABSA PRIVATE BANK marks became widely known. The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s ABSA and ABSA PRIVATE BANK marks.
...
2018-08-17 - Case Details
In Belgium, the Complainant offers a wide range of banking solutions, through its affiliate company Axa Bank Belgium – under the trademark AXA BANK – which was elected Bank of the Year in 2006 and won two Bank Awards in 2017 and 2018.
...In this case, the disputed domain name contains the Complainant’s trademarks AXA and AXA BANK in their entirety. The Panel considers that the addition of the dictionary terms “bank” and “mail” do not suffice to avoid a finding of confusing similarity with the trademark AXA.
...
2020-07-21 - Case Details
Domaincar c/o Perthshire Marketing aka Domaincar, NAF Claim No. 671079; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Inc., NAF Claim No. 787945; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc and The Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited v. ...Jim Bowen, NAF Claim No. 1045991; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc v. Ramzi Takch, NAF Claim No. 1106036; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc v. ...
2013-01-24 - Case Details
Domaincar c/o Perthshire Marketing a/k/a Domaincar, NAF Claim No. 671079; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc and The Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited v. Yorgi Brawn, NAF Claim No. 787945; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc v. ...Jim Bowen, NAF Claim No. 1045991; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc v. Ramzi Takch, NAF Claim No. 1106036; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc v. ...
2012-11-09 - Case Details
The Complainant's mark also disclaims any rights in the word "bank". But this does not mean that the term "bank" can be ignored. This term features prominently in the Complainant's mark. That mark includes only two terms – "amegy" and "bank". The Complainant does not have a mark for the term "amegy" standing alone. It is the Complainant itself that has decided to register the term "bank" in its mark. ...
2014-11-21 - Case Details
Other companies using the mark CB&T and offering banking services include Cumberland Bank & Trust using domain name ; CBT Bank using the domain name ; Citizens Bank & Trust using the domain name and Community Bank & Trust using the domain name .
...Other companies using CB&T and offering banking services include Cumberland Bank & Trust using domain name ; CBT Bank using the domain name ; Citizens Bank & Trust using the domain name and Community Bank & Trust using the domain name .
...
2017-06-29 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Amalgamated Bank v. Muslum Degin
Case No. D2018-2875
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Amalgamated Bank of New York, New York, United States of America (“United States”), represented by Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, United States.
...It holds United States Registration No. 4575332, a logo including the words “Amalgamated Bank” and No. 3852482 the words “AMALGAMATED BANK”, dating respectively from July 29, 2014 and September 28, 2010. ...
2019-02-26 - Case Details
Complainant has exclusive rights in the SALLIE MAE marks in the USA since 1991(Annex 3 to the Complaint). Sallie Mae Bank, established in 2005, is an affiliate of Sallie Mae, Inc. Sallie Mae Bank registered the SALLIE MAE BANK marks since 2006, and the SALLIE MAE logo in 2013 (Annex 3 to the Complaint). ...Sallie Mae registered the SALLIE MAE BANK mark since 2006. As such, both SALLIE MAE and SALLIE MAE BANK marks registrations long precede Respondent’s registration of the disputed domain names (June 3, 2013).
...
2013-09-27 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Stockman Bank of Montana v. Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues,
Fundacion Comercio
Case No. D2022-0590
1. ...Factual Background
The Complainant, Stockman Bank of Montana, was incorporated in 1944 and promotes banking services
online under the trademark STOCKMAN BANK
The Complainant is the owner of U.S. trademark registration No. 3,018,890 STOCKMAN BANK, registered
on November 29, 2005, for financial services in class 36 and of U.S. trademark registration No. 4,290,830
STOCKMAN BANK, registered on February 19, 2013, for banking services in class 36.
...
2022-04-25 - Case Details