Factual Background
Complainant is a multinational conglomerate with its principal place of business in Decatur, Illinois, USA. Complainant owns Hickory Point Bank & Trust, fsb, which is a federal savings bank (i.e., a bank chartered under United States banking laws). ...Complainant has no protected interest in the "Hickory Point Bank" mark. Respondent researched whether "Hickory Point Bank" was a registered trademark before registering the Domain Name. ...
2002-07-17 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on July 25, 2002, and is using the domain name to provide links to third parties’ websites that offer various financial and banking services.
The Complainant is a multi-bank holding company, which owns second tier holding company, Fifth Third Financial Corporation, and 11 wholly-owned direct subsidiaries: Fifth Third Bank; Fifth Third Bank, Florida; Fifth Third Bank, Northern Kentucky, Inc.; Fifth Third Bank, Kentucky, Inc.; Fifth Third Bank, Indiana; Fifth Third Bank (Michigan); Fifth Third Community Development Corporation; Fifth Third Investment Company; Heartland Capital Management, Inc; Old Kent Capital Trust I and Fifth Third Reinsurance Company, LTD. ...Van Johns, WIPO Case
No. D2001-0908, Macquarie Bank Limited v. Mike Smith, WIPO
Case No. D2003-0890, Macquarie Bank Limited v. Robert Seagle aka Oxford
University, WIPO Case No. ...
2004-01-09 - Case Details
Domaincar c/o Perthshire Marketing a/k/a Domaincar, NAF Claim No. 671079; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc and The Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited v. Yorgi Brawn, NAF Claim No. 787945; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc v. ...Jim Bowen, NAF Claim No. 1045991; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc v. Ramzi Takch, NAF Claim No. 1106036; The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc v. ...
2012-07-10 - Case Details
The disputed domain name differs from the registered SALLIE MAE BANK trademarks by the omission of the letter “n” from the word BANK and the additional gTLD “.com”.
The disputed domain name differs from the registered SALLIE MAE BANK trademarks by the omission of the letter “k” from the word BANK and the additional gTLD “.com”.
The disputed domain name differs from the registered SALLIE MAE BANK trademarks by the omission of the letter “a” from the word BANK and the additional gTLD “.com”.
The disputed domain name differs from the registered SALLIE MAE BANK trademarks by the replacing of the letter “e” in the word MAE with the letter “i” and the additional gTLD “.com”.
...
2013-09-11 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Dollar Bank, Federal Savings Bank v. Above.com Domain Privacy / Transure Enterprise Ltd
Case No. D2016-0700
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Dollar Bank, Federal Savings Bank of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America, represented by Metz Lewis Brodman Must O'Keefe LLC of United States of America.
...
2016-06-21 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
MUFG Union Bank, N.A. v. William Bookout
Case No. DME2014-0008
1. The Parties
The Complainant is MUFG Union Bank, N.A. of San Francisco, California, United States of America ("USA" or "US"), represented by DLA Piper US LLP, USA.
...Factual Background
The Complainant is a federally supervised retail bank headquartered in San Francisco, California, USA. It is the successor to a California bank established in the 19th Century, which merged to form Union Bank of California in 1996, known as UnionBanCal. ...
2014-12-18 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Keppel TatLee Bank Limited v. Lars Taylor
Case No. D2001-0168
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Keppel TatLee Bank Limited, a company incorporated in Singapore, having its registered office and principal place of business at 10 Hoe Chiang Road, #06-00 Keppel Towers, Singapore 089315, Singapore.
...In December 1998, the Complainant acquired another Singapore bank, Tat Lee Bank Limited, and it became known as Keppel TatLee Bank Limited which is its official name today. ...
2001-04-10 - Case Details
Factual Background
4.1 Complainant has been using a formative version of the BANK RATE or BANKRATE service marks from at least as early as December 20, 1982. Complainant holds U.S. registrations for trademarks containing BANK RATE or BANKRATE, including a registration for the Service Mark BANK RATE MONITOR & Design for providing financial newsletters first use in commerce on December 20, 1982, and registered on the Principal Register March 17, 1992, (U.S. ...Moreover, all of the alleged BANK RATE Trademark Registrations cited against Respondent either: (a) expressly disclaim any right to exclusive use of the term "bank rate"; or (b) are Supplemental Registrations which evidence the U.S. ...
2003-03-12 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
ZB, N.A., dba California Bank & Trust v. Domain Admin, Whois Privacy Corp.
Case No. D2016-0489
1. The Parties
The Complainant is ZB, N.A., dba California Bank & Trust of Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America ("United States") represented by Callister Nebeker & McCullough, United States.
...The disputed domain name is identical or, respectively, confusingly similar to the Complainant's CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST, CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST (with design) and CALBANK NETWORK marks.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Complainant has satisfied the first element of the Policy.
...
2016-04-27 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration
and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE
PANEL DECISION
Canara Bank v. Canarabank
Case No. D2006-0412
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Canara Bank, Bangalore, India, represented by Pavan Duggal & Associates, India.
...Complainant has established common law rights in its trademark CANARA BANK by extensive use of the trademark and name CANARA BANK for over 100 years in association with banking. ...
2006-06-22 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration
and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Roskilde Bank A/S v. Jurij Antonov
Case No. D2006-1069
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Roskilde Bank A/S, Roskilde, Denmark, represented by Bech-Bruun, Denmark.
...The following designation “den lokale Bank” is descriptive as it refers to the scope of the activities of the bank. The distinctive element of the trademark is the word “ROSKILDEBANK”.
...
2006-11-07 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Habib Bank AG Zurich v. Jay Smith
Case No. D2003-0216
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Habib Bank AG Zurich, Habib House, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by CMS Cameron McKenna of London, United Kingdom Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
...The Panel finds that the Respondent’s bad faith is evidenced by the overwhelming fame and reputation of the Complainant’s famous trade mark HABIB BANK, by the apparent intended commercial nature of the Respondent’s website and by the obvious connection between the Respondent’s unauthorised Disputed Domain Name and the Complainant’s famous registered trade mark HABIB BANK AG ZURICH and its name Habib Bank.
7. ...
2003-06-12 - Case Details
Factual Background
Complainant is a Salt Lake City, Utah-based bank. Complainant is the owner of the following trademarks
registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office that are relevant to this proceeding:
- ZIONS BANK, U.S. ...Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
Complainant is a United States bank. Complainant does business under the ZIONS BANK Marks, as well
as, under the similar name Zions First National Bank. ...
2022-03-30 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Marathon Savings Bank v. Domain Manager, Affordable Webhosting, Inc., Advertising
Case No. D2017-1841
1. The Parties
Complainant is Marathon Savings Bank of Wausau, Wisconsin, United States of America, represented by Quarles & Brady LLP, United States of America.
...Factual Background
Complainant offers banking services under the name Marathon Savings Bank. Complainant was established in Marathon County, Wisconsin, United State, in 1902 as Marathon Savings and Loan Association and in 1993 changed its name to Marathon Savings Bank. ...
2017-12-14 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Indusind Bank Limited v. Manish Bhalla
Case No. D2020-1753
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Indusind Bank Limited, India, represented by SNG & Partners, India.
...Factual Background
The Complainant is an Indian scheduled commercial bank that is registered with the Reserve Bank of India under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The Complainant owns registered trademarks for the mark INDUSIND BANK under class 36. ...
2020-11-05 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Comerica Bank v. Adex Adex
Case No. D2016-1438
1. The Parties
Complainant is Comerica Bank of Dallas, Texas, United States of America, represented by Bodman PLC, United States of America ("United States" or U.S.).
...In the instant proceeding, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's COMERICA and COMERICA BANK marks as it incorporates the COMERICA and COMERICA BANK marks in their entirety at the head of the disputed domain name. ...
2016-09-14 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is a German mid-sized universal bank, conducting its retail customer business and most of its corporate customer business through its subsidiary BW-Bank.
...In addition to its BW-BANK trademarks the Complainant has also registered the domain name under which the main website for BW-Bank is available and where its banking and finance services are offered.
...
2021-10-08 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration
and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE
PANEL DECISION
Finter Bank Zürich v. Charles Osabor
Case No. D2005-1142
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Finter Bank Zürich of Zurich, Switzerland, represented by CMS von Erlach Henrici, Switzerland.
...The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality
and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules,
paragraph 7.
4. Factual Background
The Complainant, Finter Bank Zürich, owns the following trademark:
- the Swiss trademark no P-418617 for FINTER BANK ZÜRICH, filed and registered in 1995. ...
2006-01-24 - Case Details
投诉人在全球范围内申请和注册了多件包含STANBIC、STANBIC BANK以及CFC STANBIC BANK字样的文字及图形商标，包括但不限于中国第755004号STANBIC商标，注册于1995年7月7日；欧洲联盟第008149651号STANBIC BANK图形商标，注册于2010年1月31日；以及肯尼亚第1080473号CFC STANBIC BANK A MEMBER OF STANDARD BANK GROUP图形商标，注册于2014年5月6日。...最后，争议域名完全包含了投诉人的独特和专属的STANBIC和STANBIC BANK文字及图形商标以及CFC STANBIC BANK A MEMBER OF STANDARD BANK GROUP图形商标中的突出文字部分即CFC STANBIC BANK。因此，专家组认定争议域名与投诉人享有民事权益的商标相同或具有足以导致混淆的近似性。
...
2020-07-21 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc v.
"Christopher Graham" or "John Graham" dba GRA Marketing CL
Case No. ...The Parties
The Complainants in these Administrative Proceedings are The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc ("the First Named Complainant") and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. ("the Second Named Complainant").
...
2001-07-16 - Case Details