Hulmiho Ukolen, Poste restante / Domain Admin, Whois protection, this company does not own this domain name s.r.o.,
WIPO Case No. D2016-0933; LEGO Juris A/S v. Hulmiho Ukolen, Poste restante / Domain Admin, Whois protection,
WIPO Case No. D2016-1604; Accenture Global Services Limited v. ...
2018-01-03 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have found that in the absence of any license or permission from a complainant to use complainant's trademarks, no bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed. See, LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com, Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2017-06-23 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have found that in the absence of any license or permission from a complainant to use complainant's trademarks, no bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed. See, LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com, Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2017-10-12 - Case Details
专家组认为这一决定并不会给当事双方造成不公平且能促使行政程序高效及经济地进行。并且，专家组决定使用中文作出本案裁决。参见 LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Zhong Huijie， WIPO 案件编号D2011-1381。
6.2 实质性问题：分析与认定
根据政策第4条(a)项的规定，投诉书必须同时符合以下三个要素，方能胜诉。
...
2017-10-03 - Case Details
The Dissenting Panelist visited the disputed domain name and finds that the Respondent is not making use of the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services or making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. LEGO Juris A/S v. Admin Hostmaster,
WIPO Case No. D2016-1474.
Although the Respondent argues that disputed domain name has a generic meaning in Turkish, it would not be expected to associate such meaning with an offering of any goods or services or any other meaningful content. ...
2018-01-10 - Case Details
In previous decisions, panels found that in the absence of any license or permission from the complainant to use such widely-known trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed (LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-09-17 - Case Details
鉴于此，为了不给投诉人带来不必要的资金负担和不便以及不延误行政程序，专家组决定接受投诉人所提交的英文版投诉书及相关材料，不要求投诉人提供中文翻译文本，但是专家组决定使用中文作出本案裁决。专家组认为这一决定并不会给当事人造成不公平且能促使行政程序高效及经济地进行。参见 LEGO Juris A/S 诉Zhong Huijie, WIPO 案件编号 D2011-1381。
6.2 实质性问题：分析与认定
根据政策第4条(a)项的规定，投诉书必须同时符合以下三个要素，方能胜诉。
...
2018-11-26 - Case Details
Dublin) Limited v. Dejan Macesic,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1698; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrew Orr,
WIPO Case No. D2015-1311).
As shown in the evidence submitted by the Complainant, on January 11, 2018, almost three months after the abovementioned Cease and Desist letter was sent to the Respondents, the content of the website to which the disputed domain name resolved was substituted with content related to the purported acronym OCULUSGO, stating for "meaning "Orientation to Universal Free Creators Using Synchrony and Generating Prayers" (in Spanish language).
...
2018-06-05 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have found that in the absence of any license or permission from a complainant to use a complainant’s trademarks, generally no bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed. See, LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-04-03 - Case Details
En este sentido véanse anteriores resoluciones, tales como el caso LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2019-03-13 - Case Details
The Panel takes
this as strong corroborating evidence of Respondent’s bad faith. LEGO Juris A/S v. Ammar Briouel / Brahim
Mahjoubi, WIPO Case No. D2019-0750 (involving bad faith indicia based upon website suspension following
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2009/d2009-1017.html
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2022-08-11 - Case Details
D2014-1875, Sportswear Company S.PA. v. Tang Hong; WIPO Case No. D2010-0138, LEGO Juris A/S v.
DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master).
...
2022-08-04 - Case Details
Por otra parte, tratar de confundir a terceros, haciéndose pasar como la Demandante, es indicativo de mala
fe, puesto que es clara su intención de perturbar la actividad comercial de la Demandante y afectar su
reputación.
5 Ver LEGO Juris A/S v. NyunHwa Jung, Caso OMPI No. D2012-2491.
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2022-10-25 - Case Details
Further, the company listed at the disputed domain name’s previous website, “Arcelor Mining Investment Co” does not exist, which is further evidence of the Respondent’s bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Aamir Abdul Wahid, Spiro Line Media,
WIPO Case No. D2019-0245, which found that the respondent registered the domain name in bad faith for the purpose of unfairly competing and unfairly disrupting the business of the Complainant’s site and to attract customers and potential customers of the Complainant for commercial gain.
...
2021-03-19 - Case Details
case=D2005-0694
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2008-0016
page 5
LEGO Juris A/S v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio
Electronico, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-08-26 - Case Details
Así, el Experto considera que el Demandado registró y está usando el nombre de dominio en disputa con el
propósito de perturbar la actividad de la Demandante lo que constituye mala fe de conformidad con la
Política.
5 Ver LEGO Juris A/S v. NyunHwa Jung, Caso OMPI No. D2012-2491.
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2024-06-06 - Case Details
D2010-0936 ("[T]he addition of the descriptive word "beauty" to the Complainant's REVLON trade mark, by referencing the goods for which the mark is known, increases the likelihood of confusion."); LEGO Juris A/S v. Private, Registration/Dohe Dot,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0753 (adding terms that are generic or descriptive of Complainant's products is likely to produce more confusion since it creates an obvious association with Complainant); and Revlon Consumer Products Corporation v. ...
2011-01-13 - Case Details
The disputed domain name is not simply the trademark or the trademark with some ancillary or accessory connotation: e.g. LEGO Juris A/S v. Legoverhuur.nl, Frank Schuermans,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1559 (legoverhuur.com) and IVECO S.p.A. v. ...
2012-02-06 - Case Details
In this context, the Complainant refers to decisions where the panel found that there is bad faith registration where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection to the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith. The Complainant cites here LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494 and Sanofi-aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2013-11-27 - Case Details
The addition of the word “hub” suggests that the related website is a central location somehow related to the Complainant. As noted in LEGO Juris A/S v Private, Registration/Dohe Dot,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0753, the addition of a term that is generic or descriptive is likely to produce confusion since it creates an association with the Complainant. ...
2013-06-03 - Case Details