Banijay Group has built many long-running shows, such as Big Brother, MasterChef, Survivor, Lego Masters,
Touche pas à mon Poste, Who wants to be a millionaire or Don’t forget the Lyrics.
The Complainants’ business has 4,650 employees worldwide and their 2023 revenue was EUR 4,318
million.
...
2024-12-13 - Case Details
The Panel
takes this as corroborating evidence of Respondent’s bad faith. LEGO Juris A/S v. Ammar Briouel / Brahim
Mahjoubi, WIPO Case No. D2019-0750 (involving website suspension following a takedown request by
Complainant).
...
2022-09-05 - Case Details
Prior
panels have held that bad faith can be found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a
well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection to the trademarks suggests
opportunistic bad faith (see LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091). Given the
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2009/d2009-0320.html
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2009/d2009-0113.html
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2022-10-18 - Case Details
Previous Panels have held that the registration of a domain name obviously connected with well-known trademarks by someone without any connection to these trademarks suggests opportunistic bad faith. See, among others, LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494.
At the time of initial filing of the Complaint, the Respondent employed a privacy service to hide his identity, which past panels have held serves as further evidence of bad faith registration and use. ...
2016-09-20 - Case Details
It has been held in previous UDRP decisions that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of the domain name's registration can suggest bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D'Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona ("La Caixa") v. ...
2016-10-12 - Case Details
The Panel accepts that the Respondent has not acquired trademark or service mark rights, that the Respondent’s use and registration of the disputed domain name was not authorized by the Complainant and that, in the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use its widely-known trademark, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2017-05-31 - Case Details
In previous decisions, UDRP panels found that in the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use its trademark, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed considering Respondent’s use of the disputed domain names(Groupe Auchan v. Gan Yu,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0188; LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-05-25 - Case Details
关于该些字母，专家组认为它们都不具有区别争议域名与投诉人商标的显著效果。关于通用顶级域名后缀，专家组认为在本案中亦不具有任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果（参见LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong，WIPO案件编号D2009-1611及Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG 诉 zhanglei，WIPO案件编号D2014-0080）。...
2016-11-14 - Case Details
其唯一其余部分为一个顶级域名后缀“.mom”，可译为“妈妈”。专家组认为该顶级域名后缀在本案中不具有任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果 (参见LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong，WIPO案件编号D2009-1611及Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG 诉 zhanglei，WIPO案件编号D2014-0080）。...
2016-11-08 - Case Details
A TLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark for the purposes of a comparison under the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-12-14 - Case Details
The Complainant cited, inter alia, the cases of LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0091, and LANCOME PARFUMS ET BEAUTE & CIE, L'ORÉAL v. 10 Selling,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-05-19 - Case Details
While this element is not present in the Complainant’s VENTE-PRIVEE and logo trademarks, a gTLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-06-01 - Case Details
Such facts establishes bad faith registration and use pursuant to paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Whois Privacy Services Pty Ltd / Dzone Inc., Yeonju Hong,
WIPO Case No. D2012-2442 (finding that respondent was using the domain name as a parked pay-per-click page and was, thus, intentionally attempting to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users by creating a likelihood of confusion with the complainant’s mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation or endorsement of its website).
...
2017-07-05 - Case Details
诉 Mika Harms, Hackett Shop UK，WIPO 案件编号D2017-2114。关于通用顶级域名，专家组认为该部分在本案中亦不具有任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果。参见LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong，WIPO案件编号D2009-1611 及Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG 诉 zhanglei，WIPO案件编号D2014-0080。...
2018-06-22 - Case Details
However, a TLD suffix may generally be disregarded in the comparison of a domain name with a trademark for the purposes of the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-05-14 - Case Details
However, a TLD suffix may generally be disregarded in the comparison of a domain name with a trademark for the purposes of the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-01-19 - Case Details
Moreover, numerous panels have viewed website suspension by the Registrar or webhost, absent any
explanation or attempted justification by the respondent, as added corroboration of bad faith. See LEGO
Juris A/S v. Ammar Briouel / Brahim Mahjoubi, WIPO Case No. D2019-0750 (involving website suspension
following a takedown request by the complainant); Hershey Entertainment & Resorts Company v. ...
2026-03-12 - Case Details
The Panel cites with approval the posture in cases such as LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-01-14 - Case Details
D2021-0774; Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin v. Milen Radumilo,
WIPO Case No. DCO2020-0090; LEGO Juris A/S v. ken Teo,
WIPO Case No. D2020-2380; Sanofi v. WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. / Todd Peter,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-07-01 - Case Details
争议域名也包括通用顶级域名后缀“.com”。专家组认为该部分在本案中亦不具有任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果。参见LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong，WIPO 案件编号 D2009-1611及Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG 诉 zhanglei，WIPO 案件编号 D2014-0080。
...
2020-09-11 - Case Details