D2021-0774; Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin v. Milen Radumilo,
WIPO Case No. DCO2020-0090; LEGO Juris A/S v. ken Teo,
WIPO Case No. D2020-2380; Sanofi v. WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. / Todd Peter,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-07-01 - Case Details
The Panel thus infers that Respondent must have been aware of this trademark and its reputation when it registered the disputed domain name, so that the disputed domain name () was registered in bad faith”); LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Sanofi-Aventis v. Nevis Domains, LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-05-05 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have consistently held that the addition of a descriptive term to a disputed domain name that incorporates a trademark in its entirety typically does not prevent the finding of confusing similarity. See LEGO Juris A/S v. DBA David Inc/ DomainsByProxy.com,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1290.
For all the foregoing reasons, the Panel finds that the first element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy has therefore been satisfied by the Complainant.
...
2022-01-04 - Case Details
In the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use their
trademarks, the composition of the disputed domain name, and the fact that the disputed domain name
resolves to a website that uses the Complainant’s trademarks and contains PPC links to competing banking
services, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain name could
reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.P.A. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875;
and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd,
Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-04-29 - Case Details
参见 Mastercard International Inc.诉 Better, Deals; Finestnames.com，WIPO 案件编号
D2009-0702；Dunkin’ Donuts Incorporated and Dunkin’ Donuts USA, Inc.诉 Dazzledesigns，WIPO 案件编
号 D2004-0436；LEGO Juris A/S 诉 bangfei jiang，WIPO 案件编号 D2012-1235。因此，被投诉人曾经将争
议域名用于含有成人内容的网站的这一行为构成恶意，且专家组认为被投诉人的这一行为损害了投诉人商标的
声誉，破坏了投诉人正常的业务活动。
...
2024-01-09 - Case Details
Rohan mubbahir Kahn, WIPO Case
No. D2021-1314; LEGO Juris A/S v. John Davis, WIPO Case No. D2018-0313 and Victorinox AG v. Andre
Freitas, Result Capital WIPO Case No. ...
2023-05-04 - Case Details
D2014-1875 (“In the absence of any license or
permission from the Complainant to use its trademark, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use
of the Disputed Domain Name could reasonably be claimed.”); LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David
Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-01-12 - Case Details
In the absence of any license or
permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate
use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.PA. v.
Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith,
Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-01-19 - Case Details
Sportswear
Company S.P.A. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David
Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-01-19 - Case Details
Prior
panels have held that bad faith can be found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a
well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection to the trademarks suggests
opportunistic bad faith (see LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091). Given the strong
reputation and distinctiveness of the Complainant’s trademark, registration in bad faith can be inferred.
...
2023-02-21 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have regularly ruled that bad faith was found where a domain name is so obviously
connected with a well-known trademark that its use by someone, with no connection to the trademark,
suggests opportunistic bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091 and
Carrefour v. Jean-Claude Bot / Albert Pierre, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-11-09 - Case Details
Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues,
Fundacion Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case No. D2019-3045; LEGO Juris A/S v. Registration
Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case
No. ...
2023-09-19 - Case Details
In addition, the Panel finds, similarly to other UDRP panels, that the addition of the gTLD “.online” to the
Disputed Domain Name does not constitute an element as to avoid confusing similarity for the purposes of
the Policy (see, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Nguyen Xuan Hau, WIPO Case No. D2023-4439; Philip Morris
Products S.A. v. Маханьков Михаил Владимирович / Makhankov Mikhail, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-03-12 - Case Details
杨智超) Yang Zhi Chao, WIPO Case No.
D2023-3983 and Lego Juris A/S v. Yang Zhi Chao (杨智超), WIPO Case No. D2023-0056. Such use
constitutes evidence of bad faith registration and use as contemplated under paragraph 4(b)(ii) of the Policy.
...
2024-03-11 - Case Details
In the absence of any license or
permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate
use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.PA. v.
Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith,
Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-05-19 - Case Details
In the absence of any license or
permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks, no bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed
domain name could reasonably be claimed in the circumstances of this case (see, e.g., Sportswear
Company S.PA. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd,
David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No.
...
2023-06-23 - Case Details
The Panel also finds applicable to this case the position on the use of English as the fairest neutral
language, stated by previous UDRP panels under similar scenarios (see LEGO Juris A/S v. Asiagroup,
WIPO Case No. D2022-2829, IPSOS v. Beats, WIPO Case No. D2022-1055).
...
2024-08-16 - Case Details
The Panel takes this as evidence of Respondent’s bad faith. LEGO Juris A/S v. Ammar
Briouel / Brahim Mahjoubi, WIPO Case No. D2019-0750 (involving website suspension following a takedown
request by Complainant).
...
2024-04-15 - Case Details
The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name because the Respondent has no trademark rights in or license to use the Complainant's trademarks (citing LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2014-12-29 - Case Details
The Panel accepts that the Respondent has not acquired trademark or service mark rights, that the Respondent’s use and registration of the disputed domain name was not authorized by the Complainant and that, in the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use its widely-known trademark, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2017-05-31 - Case Details