Private Whois,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1507
No response
SNCF - Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. Private Registration - BMON/ Telecom Tech Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0156
20 days
Atlas Copco Aktiebolag v. ...The reasons for this are discussed in Delta Air Transport NV (trading as SN Brussels Airlines) v. Theodule De Souza,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0372 and 1066 Housing Association Ltd. v. Mr. D. Morgan,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1461.
...
2012-01-19 - Case Details
Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI
DECISIÓN DEL GRUPO DE EXPERTOS
Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. c. ...Refresh Design,
Caso OMPI No. D2009-0601; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
Caso OMPI No. D2008-1849; Terroni Inc. v. ...
2015-11-17 - Case Details
Geocaching Zero,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2014-08-04 - Case Details
El Registrador del citado nombre de dominio es Arsys Internet, S.L. dba NICLINE.COM.
3. Iter Procedimental
La Demanda se presentó ante el Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI (el "Centro") el 11 de marzo de 2014. ...Ver Société Nationale des Chemins de fer Français - SNCF v. Damian Miller / Miller Inc.,
Caso OMPI No. D2009-0891 ("El experto también nota que no hay uso no comercial o leal del nombre de dominio puesto que el sitio web contienen vínculos patrocinados hacia sitios web comerciales que ofrecen servicios de trenes o boletos de tren que compiten con los del demandante".4 ) Ver también First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. v. ...
2014-05-23 - Case Details
Complainant has not consented to Respondent's use of the SAM'S CLUB marks. See Société des Produits Nestle S.A. v. Cook,
WIPO Case No. D2002-0118; Six Continents Hotels, Inc. v. IQ Management Corporation,
WIPO Case No. ...D2008-0707 (finding bad faith where the respondent intentionally attempted to attract for commercial gain Internet users to the relevant websites by creating a likelihood of confusion with the [c]omplainant's trade mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation or endorsement or those website” through the domain names); Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. ostrid co, Domains by Proxy, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0627 (respondent's use of confusingly similar domain name for pay-per-click website deemed bad faith registration and use); Busy Body, Inc. v. ...
2008-10-14 - Case Details
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademarks owned by the Complainant because it is
comprised of the Complainant’s VALERO mark in its entirety, plus the abbreviation “ng” for the geographical
region of Nigeria, along with the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”), “.com”.
See Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français, SNCF v. Transure Enterprise Ltd / Above.com Domain
Privacy, WIPO Case No. ...Transure Enterprise Ltd / Above.com Domain Privacy, WIPO Case No. D2011-0920; Société des
Produits Nestlé S.A. v. Above.com Domain Privacy, Shu Lin, Shu Lin Enterprises Limited, WIPO Case No.
...
2022-11-18 - Case Details
The Parties
The Complainant is Sanofi-aventis of Paris, France, represented by Selarl Marchais De Candé, France.
The Respondent is Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host Master, British Virgin Islands, Overseas Territory of the United Kingdom of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
2. ...The addition of the “www” prefix has been cited as a common practice of “typo-squatters” who try to take advantage of the fact that Internet users may fail to insert a period between the World Wide Web prefix and the remainder of the domain name”); Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. Sinclare Vabalon, BHG,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0886 (“the addition of the prefix “www” constitutes a typosquatting that does not exclude the likelihood of confusion between the Complainant's trademarks and the disputed Domain Name”).
...
2008-12-24 - Case Details
The Respondent has never been licensed or granted permission from the Complainants to use their mark and therefore he has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (Compagnie de Saint Gobain v. Com-Union Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0020).
Furthermore, the Complainants essentially argue that the disputed domain name is also being used in bad faith, as it was registered primarily for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the domain name registration to the owner of the trademark for valuable consideration in excess of the domain name registrant’s out-of-pocket costs and by using the domain name until it is sold, the Respondent has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to a website, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainants’ trademarks as to the source or affiliation of the website or of a product or service on the website. ...Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2014-03-06 - Case Details
See for example some recent UDRP decisions: SNCF - Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. Transure Enterprise Ltd /Above.com Domain Privacy,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-08-10 - Case Details
Jameela Seif,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français SNCF contre Assane Amadoun,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0714).
Thirdly, this Panel finds on the basis of previous UDRP decisions that the mere addition of generic terms is, in general, insufficient to make a disputed domain name distinctive such that it is not confusingly similar to the complainant's registered Trademark. ...
2014-11-03 - Case Details
Jameela Seif,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français SNCF contre Assane Amadoun,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0714).
Thirdly, this Panel finds on the basis of previous UDRP decisions that the mere addition of generic terms is, in general, insufficient to make a disputed domain name distinctive such that it is not confusingly similar to the complainant's registered Trademark. ...
2014-11-03 - Case Details
Jameela Seif,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français SNCF contre Assane Amadoun,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0714).
Thirdly, this Panel finds on the basis of previous UDRP decisions that the mere addition of generic terms is, in general, insufficient to make a disputed domain name distinctive such that it is not confusingly similar to the complainant’s registered Trademark. ...
2014-11-03 - Case Details
Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2014-02-26 - Case Details
专家组认为，单纯的域名购买或注册行为并不产生权利或合法利益，即使被注册域名包含了描述性或通用词汇。参见Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français 诉RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg，WIPO 案件编号 D2008-1849。...
2021-08-11 - Case Details
Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2013-11-21 - Case Details
Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666 Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2014-02-19 - Case Details
In light of the Respondent’s use of the disputed domain to provide sponsored links to third parties’ commercial websites, the Respondent is not making legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. See, e.g., Societe Nationale des Chemins de fer Francais – SNCF v. Damian Miller/Miller, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0891 (holding that “… there is no noncommercial or fair use of the domain name given that the website contains sponsored links to third parties’ commercial websites offering services for train or train tickets that compete with those of the complainant”). ...
2017-02-17 - Case Details
Both are companies incorporated under French law and share a common address of 2 rue de la Mare Neuve, 91000 Evry, France. The Complaint describes SoLuxury HMC as “a subsidiary of Accor”. ...The Complainant alleges that the Disputed Domain Names are not respectively used as blogs but rather, link to PPC landing pages which use “does not represent a use in connection with a bona fide offering of goods and services” (citing Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. ostrid company, Domains by Proxy, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0627; Educational Testing Service (ETS) v. ...
2009-05-15 - Case Details
Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI
DECISIÓN DEL GRUPO DE EXPERTOS
Superboletos Monterrey, S.A. de C.V. c. ...Al respecto, diversas decisiones bajo la UDRP han determinado que el mero registro de un nombre de dominio, incluso si se trata de uno compuesto por palabras de diccionario, no confiere automáticamente derechos o intereses legítimos sobre el mismo (ver Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. ...
2017-03-09 - Case Details