About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Opposition and Administrative Revocation Mechanisms

National and regional laws provide opposition and other administrative revocation and invalidation mechanisms that make it possible for third parties to intervene in the patent examination process before the grant of a patent, or to challenge a patent after its grant.

While the design of such mechanisms may differ from one country/region to another, the common objective is to provide a simple, quick and inexpensive means to increase patent quality by providing additional input to the process. These mechanisms also provide an alternative to potentially lengthy and costly judicial proceedings.

SCP working documents:

  • Report on WIPO’s Technical Assistance Activities Relating to Opposition Systems and other Administrative Revocation Mechanisms (SCP/31/4)
  • Opposition Systems and other Administrative Revocation and Invalidation Mechanisms (SCP/18/4)
  • Opposition Systems (SCP/17/9)
  • Opposition Systems (SCP/14/5)
  • Report on the International Patent System (SCP/12/3 Rev.2)

The most common mechanisms are:

Opposition Systems

Many countries provide opposition mechanisms in their patent systems. Opposition systems stricto sensu offer third parties an opportunity to oppose the grant of a patent within a certain period of time provided by the applicable law.

Re-examination Systems

A re-examination is a proceeding conducted by the patent office after the grant of a patent in which the validity of a patent is re-examined at the request of the patentee or third party, as provided by the applicable law.

Administrative revocation and invalidation mechanisms

The administrative revocation and invalidation mechanisms provide for an inter partes review of the validity of a patent which is not limited to a certain period after the grant of the patent.

Submission of information by third parties

Many patent offices provide the opportunity for third parties to submit prior art documents, such as published patent applications and patents or other publications, which they believe are relevant to the determination of patentability of the claimed invention.