About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Diplomatic Conference Ends with no Agreement in spite of Substantial Progress

Geneva, December 20, 2000
Press Releases PR/2000/251

For the first time ever, negotiators from over 120 countries provisionally agreed on a set of rules aimed at strengthening the rights of performers in their audiovisual performances. Provisional agreement was reached at the Diplomatic Conference on the Protection of Audiovisual Performances, which met from December 7 to 20, 2000, on 19 of 20 provisions including national treatment, moral rights, and economic rights covering the right of reproduction, right of distribution, right of rental, and the right of broadcasting and communication to the public. It is the first time for audiovisual performers to be accorded moral rights against any distribution or modification of their performances which would be prejudicial to their reputations.

Provisional agreement on the increased protection of the rights of performers also covers protection against circumvention of technological protection which is used in the digital environment, such as encryption. In addition, it provides remedies against any act of unauthorized removal or alteration of electronic rights management information.

In spite of the significant progress in shoring up the rights of performers in their audiovisual performances, agreement could not be reached on the fundamental question relating to the right of transfer, namely the question of how the performers' rights are acquired by the producers, by law or agreement. The Conference considered a number of different proposals, but divergence between the United States of America and countries of the European Union could not be reconciled at this time.

The Diplomatic Conference concluded by noting provisional agreement reached on 19 articles and recommended to the Assemblies of WIPO member states, which will meet in September 2001, to reconvene the Diplomatic Conference in order to reach agreement on outstanding issues.

At the close of the Conference, many delegations expressed disappointment at the outcome, namely, that an instrument had not been adopted. All delegations, without exception, pledged to continue their best efforts in the future to achieve consensus leading to the adoption of a new instrument in this area. Special thanks were expressed by many to the officers of the Conference and to the WIPO secretariat under the leadership of the Director General, Dr. Kamil Idris as well as to the Chairman of Main Committee I, which dealt with the substantive provisions of the draft instrument, Mr. Jukka Liedes, Special Adviser to the Finnish Government.

The Diplomatic Conference was attended by some 500 delegates from over 120 states and some 50 organizations.

The Diplomatic Conference on the Protection of Audiovisual Performances had sought to finalize an international instrument to safeguard the rights of performers against the unauthorized use of their performances in audiovisual media, such as television, film and video.

The adoption of a new instrument would have strengthened the position of performers in the audiovisual industry by providing a clearer legal basis for the international use of audiovisual works, both in traditional media and in digital networks.

Performers—such as, singers, musicians, dancers and actors—have enjoyed international protection for their performances since the adoption of the Rome Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organizations (the Rome Convention) in 1961. In 1996, the adoption of WPPT modernized and updated these standards to cover the rights in respect of the use of their audio performances on the Internet. The Rome Convention and the WPPT, however, grant protection mainly in relation to sound recordings of performances.

  • Tel: (+41 22) 338 81 61 or (+41 22) 338 95 47;
  • Fax: (+41 22) 338 88 10;
  • E-mail: publicinf@wipo.int