About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Panel Explores Intellectual Property Dimensions of Privatization

Geneva, November 2, 2000
Press Releases PR/2000/245

A nine-member panel of experts discussed ways to ensure that intellectual property considerations are built into national privatization policy frameworks and corporate strategies for the benefit of countries and businesses. The Ad Hoc Advisory Panel on Privatization, made up of senior-level policy-makers and academicians, held its second meeting at the headquarters of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) from October 31 to November 1, 2000 to pursue discussions initiated in May on the intellectual property aspects of privatization.

Panelists agreed that privatization was a phenomenon of increasing importance in the economies of all countries. They also recognized that the intellectual property aspects of this process were far more significant than previously recognized and required greater attention. A number of proposals to help countries improve the privatization process and its results were considered. In particular, the discussion focused on the importance of determining the value of intellectual property assets and the need for better management of these intangible resources through improved awareness of their strategic importance to business development.

The Panel agreed that WIPO had a significant role to play in addressing intellectual property aspects of privatization by providing advice on legal, economic and procedural aspects of the process; offering technical assistance; and in initiating and fostering links between governments and private sector institutions and other agencies dealing with privatization at the national and international levels.

The conclusions and recommendations resulting from this week's open and wide-ranging discussions and an earlier round of talks in May 2000, will be reflected in a final report to be presented to the WIPO Director General, Dr. Kamil Idris, early in 2001.

The Panel Coordinator is Mr. N. K. Singh, Secretary to the Prime Minister of India. The other panelists are: Professor Edward S. Ayensu, Member of the Inspection Panel, The World Bank, Professor Klaus Gretschmann, Director General, Economic and Financial Affairs, Federal Chancellery of Germany, Mr. K.G. Anthony Hill C.D, former Ambassador and Permanent Representative of Jamaica in Geneva, Mr. Jorge Alberto Lozoya, Secretary, Ibero-American Cooperation, Madrid, Professor Anne O. Krueger, Professor in Humanities and Sciences and Director, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University, United States of America, Professor Sadao Nagaoka, Professor at the Institute of Innovation, Hitotsubashi University, Japan, His Excellency Mr. Philippe Petit, Ambassador and Permanent Representative of France in Geneva, and Mr. Patrick Smith, former Director General, Australian Industrial Property Organization.

For additional information, please contact the Media Relations and Public Affairs Section at WIPO:

  • Tel: (+41 22) 338 81 61 or (+41 22) 338 95 47;
  • Fax: (+41 22) 338 88 10;
  • E-mail: publicinf@wipo.int