About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

WIPO Domain Name Dispute Resolution Services for ccTLD Operators

October 2, 2019

The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center collaborates with a growing number of country code Top-Level Domain (ccTLD) registry operators. Having launched the WIPO ccTLD Program in 2000, the WIPO Center now provides policy and operational advice and case administration services for over 75 ccTLDs.

(Photo: WIPO/Berrod) [More photos on Flickr]

To share this growing WIPO experience and help meet increasing member states ccTLD operator demand, on the margins of the 2019 WIPO Assemblies the WIPO Center organized the session “WIPO ccTLD Program for Member States and Related ccTLD Operators”.

The session also introduced the new publication “Guide to WIPO’s services for country code top-level domain registries”. Based on WIPO case and policy experience, the Guide presents ccTLD registry operators and national authorities with information on how to resolve third-party domain name disputes in a cost- and time-saving manner.

“Domain name registrations in ccTLDs serve as important business identifiers, and their number continues to increase”, said WIPO Director General Francis Gurry. “When trademark-related disputes arise, ccTLD operators often prefer to outsource case administration to WIPO, at no cost to the registry, for neutral and independent decision-making”.

The WIPO Center has so far administered over 5,100 ccTLD cases, usually representing some 15% of its annual total caseload, which also covers all international domains. Since the last meeting of the WIPO Assemblies in 2018, services were added for .AI (Anguilla), .CN and .中国 (China), .GE (Georgia), .PY (Paraguay), and .UA (Ukraine).

(الصورة: الويبو)

In 2018, the WIPO Center significantly overhauled and expanded its online party resources for ccTLD disputes. The dedicated resource homepage includes a new WIPO reference tool for case parties, which includes relevant information for each ccTLD, notably the registration agreement, dispute policy and procedural rules, registry information, model pleadings, and eligibility criteria.