About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Use and Awareness

Reference

Title: Les PME déposantes de brevets en France: caractéristiques et évolutions récentes
Author: Laura Abitbol and Hahmed Mouzaoui [OSEO], Laurence Joly [INPI]
Source:

http://www.inpi.fr/fr/l-inpi/observatoire-de-la-propriete-intellectuelle/actualites-de-l-observatoire.html

http://www.oseo.fr/content/download/51361/829262/file/%C3%A9tude%20brevet%2028janv09.pdf

Year: 2009

Details

Subject/Type: IP Protection
Focus: Commercialisation, Enforcement, Patents
Country/Territory: France
Objective: To find out more about small and medium-sized enterprises that file patents.
Sample: 402 small and medium-sized businesses that had a patent published in 2007
Methodology: Telephone interviews

Main Findings

70% of French small and medium-sized businesses that had a patent published in 2007 are regular patent applicants, while 30% are first-time applicants. The larger the business, the higher the number of patent applications is. The more businesses are involved in research and development (R&D) activities, the more likely they are to apply for patents. About 60% of respondents have benefited from at least one kind of public assistance in their innovation process.

Reasons given for filing patents were: protection against infringements/ensuring liberty of exploitation (63% of small-sized enterprises and 75% of medium-sized enterprises respectively), preventing imitation (57% each), getting an edge over competitors (40% and 54% respectively), getting an innovative image and thus maintain and convince financial/commercial partners (44% and 42% respectively), generating revenue (e.g. by licensing; 33% and 18% respectively), and facilitating cooperation and joint ventures (24% and 13% respectively).

About one in two first-time applicants considered extending their patent protection internationally, while 81% of regular applicants usually extend their patent protection beyond the national level. International patent filings mostly concern Europe, the US and Asia.

19% of small businesses and 36% of medium-sized businesses have licensed technologies to other businesses. 11% of small businesses and 34% of medium businesses have licensed technologies from other businesses. Businesses most active in R&D licensed and acquired technologies at the highest rates.

In 79% of small businesses, the CEO is responsible for managing industrial property (in 11% a specialised service; and in 10% an internal specialist). In 39% of medium businesses, a special service manages industrial property (in 38% an internal specialist; and in 23% the CEO).

One in four small businesses and 57% of medium-sized businesses have been involved in (offensive or defensive) litigation concerning counterfeiting.

[Date Added: Apr 9, 2009 ]