About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Use and Awareness

Reference

Title: Study: "Effects of counterfeiting on EU SMEs and a review of various public and private IPR enforcement initiatives and resources"
Author: Simon Rodwell [Hunter Rodwell Consulting], Philippe Van Eeckhout [Contratak S.A.S.], Alasdair Reid and Jacek Walendowski [Technopolis]
Source:

European Commission
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/enterprise_policy/industry/doc/Counterfeiting_Main%20Report_Final.pdf

Year: 2007

Details

Subject/Type: IP Protection
Focus: Commercialisation, Enforcement, Patents
Country/Territory: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands (Kingdom of the), Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom
Objective: To analyse whether and how EU-based SMEs protect their intellectual property assets.
Sample: 155 small and medium-sized enterprises based throughout the EU
Methodology: Online survey

Main Findings

More than half (55%) of the EU-based small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have registered their trademarks. However, 60% have not registered their patents, and about 70% have not registered their designs.

Internationally, most of the survey respondents have filed their patents for the United States (29%), Japan (25%), and then China (22%). When it comes to international marks registration, 33% have registered them in the US, 29% in China, and 27% in Japan.

Companies in the toy sector are most likely to register their intellectual property (IP) rights (67%), followed by “other” sectors (35%), the automotive parts sector (33%), mechanical engineering (30%), and textiles and clothing (18%).

When asked about internal company measures and external IP assistance, almost a third of respondents (31%) state that they involve staff in policing intellectual property rights (IPR); 25% rely on staff education and training; 23% carry out IP risk assessments of markets and sources; and 22% include clauses in employee contracts. Just 9% indicate that they used an in-house legal team. 38% have undertaken civil procedures against infringers. More than 20% report taking no action at all.

SME business strategy measures to protect IP include: “designing product or service to minimise risk of abuse” (23%), “retaining critical design activities in home country” (22%), and “combating reverse engineering through technological advances and techniques” (10%).

[Date Added: Nov 20, 2008 ]