About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: 2008 Survey into the Music Experience and Behaviour in Young People
Author: [University of Hertfordshire]
Year: 2008

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Music
Country/Territory: United Kingdom
Objective: To investigate the music consumption behaviour and experience of young people.
Sample: 733 respondents aged 14 and over (average age 22)
Methodology: Survey

Main Findings

63% of respondents admit to illegally downloading music, while 37% reportedly do not illegally download. Those aged 18-24 are the biggest file-sharers (69.1% download, on average 56 tracks per month), followed by the 14-17 (55.3%, 73 tracks) and 25+ (39.5%, 27 tracks) age groups. The three most often named reasons for downloading are: "it's free, save money", followed by "to find rare or unreleased material" and "try before you buy".

42% of those surveyed admit to uploading music, most of which are under 25 years old. The most popular reasons given for uploading music are: "give in return to others", "recommend music I rate highly", and "share music not on general release". Reasons invoked against uploading invoked are: "virus, security risk, pop-ups", "illegal, risk of getting caught", "artists should be paid; I paid".

Overall, 95% of respondents report copying music in some form (87% from CD to HD, CDR, MP3; 72% from HD to CD; 63% copy CDs from friends), with the 18-24 age group being the biggest copiers.

The average MP3 collection contains 1.770 tracks, 48% of which have not been paid for. The percentage of not-paid-for tracks was highest for the 14-17 age group (61%), followed by the 18-24 (50%) and the 25+ (13%) age groups.

56.1% of respondents believe that companies who profit by enabling customers to share music should pay a music licence, and 51.4% agree that companies who profit by their enabling their customers to copy music should pay a music licence. Of those supporting the idea of a music licence, 90% believe that composers, songwriters, musicians and performers should be the beneficiaries.

While 74% of youngsters would be interested in a legal file-sharing service, only 35% would be interested in a file-streaming service not letting them own a permanent copy. Illegal file sharers are the group most interested in both of these services

The awareness of copyright and the law varies widely among respondents when they are asked to specify whether certain scenarios of copying and sharing are legal. About one in two of those surveyed report having learned about copyright, with half of the information picked up informally (via newspapers, music websites, and friends) and half of it in a formal educational setting.

[Date Added: Oct 22, 2008 ]