About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Why Are People So Prone to Steal Software? The Effect of Cost Structure on Consumer Purchase and Payment Intentions
Author: Joseph C Nunes [University of Southern California], Christopher K Hsee [University of Chicago], Elke U Weber [Columbia University]
Source:

Journal of Public Policy & Marketing  23, no. 1: 43-53
http://faculty.chicagogsb.edu/christopher.hsee/vita/Papers/WhyArePeopleSoProne.pdf

Year: 2004

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Software
Country/Territory: United States of America
Objective: To examine why otherwise honest people are more inclined to steal intellectual property products than more tangible, material products.
Sample: 247 undergraduate business students; 200 undergraduate students; 140 undergraduate business students
Methodology: Three different questionnaires

Main Findings

Ordinarily law-abiding people are more prone to stealing intellectual property products (such as software) than other more tangible, material ones. This seems to be connected to the cost structure of the product perceived by the consumer: they are much more inclined to pay the costs it takes to produce a single unit of the product in question (the so-called variable costs, which are typically low for intellectual property goods and high for material goods), while they feel less obligated to pay the upfront costs, which include product research and development, buildings and equipment (the so-called fixed costs, which are usually high for intellectual property goods and low for material ones).

Accordingly, consumers feel that they cause less harm by not paying for intellectual property goods (with low variable and high fixed costs) than by not paying for conventional tangible goods (such as jewellery, with a high variable and low fixed costs), and consequently, are more likely to steal the former.

In view of this evidence, the authors recommend that marketers better communicate a more accurate representation of total costs to the consumer and that they take measures to increase the variable costs for intellectual property (creating a more favourable variable to fixed costs ratio).

[Date Added: Aug 12, 2008 ]