About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Legislative Implementation of Flexibilities - Australia

Title:Sections 6, 8, 40 (1) and (2) (a), 41 (1) and (2), 45 (3), (4) and (5), 59 (c), 100A (1) and (2) and 100 (1) and (2) of the Patens Act No. 83 of 1990 as amended by Act No. 106 of 2006
Field of IP:Patents
Type of flexibility:Disclosure related flexibilities
Summary table:PDF

Provisions of Law

6 - Deposit requirements

For the purposes of this Act, the deposit requirements are to be taken to be satisfied in relation to a micro-organism to which a specification relates if, and only if:

(a) the micro-organism was, on or before the date of filing of the specification, deposited with a prescribed depositary institution in accordance with the rules relating to micro-organisms; and

(b) the specification includes, at that date, such relevant information on the characteristics of the micro-organism as is known to the applicant; and

(c) at all times since the end of the prescribed period, the specification has included:

(i) the name of a prescribed depositary institution from which samples of the micro-organism are obtainable as provided by the rules relating to micro-organisms; and

(iii) the filing, acceptance or registration number of the deposit given by the institution; and

(d) at all times since the date of filing of the specification, samples of the micro-organism have been obtainable from a prescribed depositary institution as provided by those rules.

8 - Disclosure in basic applications

Subject to the regulations, account must not be taken, for the purposes of this Act, of a disclosure in a specification or other document filed in respect of, and at the same time as, a basic application unless the following documents are filed within the prescribed period:

(a) a copy of the specification or document;

(b) if the specification or document is not in English - a translation of the specification or document into English.

40 - Specifications

(1) A provisional specification must describe the invention.

(2) A complete specification must:

(a) describe the invention fully, including the best method known to the applicant of performing the invention; and

41 - Specifications: micro-organisms

(1) To the extent that an invention is a micro-organism, the complete specification is to be taken to comply with paragraph 40(2)(a), so far as it requires a description of the micro-organism, if the deposit requirements are satisfied in relation to the micro-organism.

(2) Where:

(a) an invention involves the use, modification or cultivation of a micro-organism, other than the micro-organism mentioned in subsection (1); and

(b) a person skilled in the relevant art in the patent area could not reasonably be expected to perform the invention without having a sample of the micro-organism before starting to perform the invention; and

(c) the micro-organism is not reasonably available to a person skilled in the relevant art in the patent area;

the specification is to be taken to comply with paragraph 40(2)(a), so far as it requires a description of the micro-organism, if, and only if, the deposit requirements are satisfied in relation to the micro-organism.

45 - Examination

(3) The applicant must inform the Commissioner, in accordance with the regulations, of the results of the following searches carried out for the purpose of assessing the patentability of an invention disclosed in the complete specification or a corresponding application filed outside Australia:

(a) any documentary searches by, or on behalf of, a foreign patent office, other than searches prescribed by the regulations;

(b) the documentary searches prescribed by the regulations.

(4) Subsection (3) only applies to searches completed before the grant of the patent.

(5) In subsection (4):

completed, in relation to a search, has the meaning prescribed by the regulations.

59 - Opposition to grant of standard patent

The Minister or any other person may, in accordance with the regulations, oppose the grant of a standard patent on one or more of the following grounds, but on no other ground:

(c) that the specification filed in respect of the complete application does not comply with subsection 40(2) or (3).

100A Refusal to grant patent - re-examination before grant

(1) Where the Commissioner makes an adverse report on a re-examination under subsection 97(1), the Commissioner may refuse to grant the patent (see subsection 61(1)).

(2) The Commissioner cannot refuse to grant a patent under this section unless the Commissioner:

(a) has given the applicant a reasonable opportunity to be heard; and

(b) has, where appropriate, given the applicant a reasonable opportunity to amend the relevant specification for the purpose of removing any lawful ground of objection and the applicant has failed to do so.

101 - Revocation of patent - re-examination after grant

(1) Where the Commissioner makes an adverse report on a re-examination under subsection 97(2), the Commissioner may, by notice in writing, revoke the patent, either wholly or so far as it relates to a particular claim, as the case requires.

(2) The Commissioner must not revoke a patent under this section unless the Commissioner:

(a) has given the patentee a reasonable opportunity to be heard; and

(b) has, where appropriate, given the patentee a reasonable opportunity to amend the relevant specification for the purpose of removing any lawful ground of objection and the patentee has failed to do so.