About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Legislative Implementation of Flexibilities - Netherlands (Kingdom of the)

Title:Articles 24 (1) (e) and (4), 25 (1), (2) and (3), 35 and 75 (1) (b) of the Patents Act of 15/12/1995(Text as it applies on 03/06/2009)
Field of IP:Patents
Type of flexibility:Disclosure related flexibilities
Summary table:PDF

Provisions of Law

Article 24

1. An application for a patent must be filed with the Office in writing and must:

e. be accompanied by a description of the invention containing, in one or more claims at the end, a description of the subject matter for which an exclusive right is being sought;

4. The application, the description of the invention, the drawings and the abstract must also be

in accordance with the other formal regulations laid down by ministerial order.

Article 25

1. The description of the invention must be clear and complete and worded such that an expert can understand the invention and use it on the basis of that description. The specifications provided in one or more claims at the end of the definition must be precise. The description should be accompanied by corresponding drawings if necessary.

2. In an invention relates to biological material that is not accessible to the public and cannot be explained in the definition such that an expert could use the invention on that basis, or if an invention implies the use of such biological material, the description will be deemed to be sufficient only if the biological material has been filed with an institution that has been designated for that purpose under or by virtue of a general order in council for the Kingdom no later than the date on which the application is filed.

3. If an invention relates to a sequence or partial sequence of a gene, the description shall contain a concrete description of the function and the industrial application of that sequence or partial sequence. In the event that a sequence or a partial sequence of a gene is used for the production of a protein or partial protein, the description of the industrial applicability shall contain a specification of the protein or partial protein that has been produced and its function.

4. Further regulations may be stipulated by general order in council for the Kingdom with respect to:

a. the information to be included in the application with respect to the characteristics and the identification of the biological material to be filed; and

b. the accessibility and availability of the biological material to be filed.

Article 35

1. If the Office is of the opinion that the search of the state of the art cannot be conducted

owing to the application's lack of clarity, it shall so inform the applicant as quickly as

possible in a substantiated, written notification.

2. If the defects are not remedied within two months of the dispatch of the notification

referred to in paragraph (1), or if the applicant gives notice before that time that he does not

wish to remedy them, the Office shall decide not to process the application. The Office shall

inform the applicant of its decision as quickly as possible.

Article 75

1. A patent shall be invalidated by the court insofar as:

b. the patent specification does not contain a description of the invention that, in

appropriate cases with the application of Article 25(2) and (3), is sufficiently clear and

complete to allow a person skilled in the art to use the invention;