About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

[process2-comments] RFC-1


[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

[process2-comments] RFC-1


  To: process.mail@wipo.int
  Subject: [process2-comments] RFC-1
  From: phoenix_eyes_@hotmail.com
  Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 07:05:23 +0200

 

 Name: K. A. Organization: NewsBank Inc. newsbank.com Position: IT,IS, software dev, web dev Concerned Personal Domain Owner and ICANN member: The part of this proposal that most bothers me, is the possible abuse of the "trade names" policy. As a domain owner (snowangel.net) I have already received one threat from a California business owner, whose business is called "Snowangel Net". She seemed to feel that "snowangel.net" sounded enough like "Snowangel Net" that this warranted me turning over the domain name. I refused and explained to her that the policies at the time would not justify such action, since I was using the domain for personal, non-profit use. Not to mention that the “net” part of “snowangel.net” is not comparable to the “Net” in “Snowangel Net”. However, I am greatly concerned that this new, much broader policy may be abused to target people like myself, who own personal domains that sound similar to a "trade name". If you wish to implement such a broad policy, please be CERTAIN you can make sure that it is ONLY used against those who wish to profit fr! om a "trade name" domain. It would be a terribly sad day when for example, someone named Joe Heinz were to lose his personal website to Heinz Ketchup. This policy may only succeed in frightening away the non-tech-savvy from the internet. Please consider making this policy less vague. You are leaving internet-ignorant lawyers to fill in the gaps. Sincerely, A Very Scared K. M. A.