WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2019-2229 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Atlassian Pty Ltd v. Contact Privacy Inc...United States of America (“United States”). The Respondent is Contact Privacy Inc., Canada / Evan Janke, The Janke Company, United States. 2. The Domain...
2019-10-28 - Case Details
WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2019-1687 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Intuit Inc. v. Domain Admin, Whois Privacy...America. The Respondent is Domain Admin, Whois Privacy Corp., Bahamas. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is...
2019-08-30 - Case Details
the world for the name, NOVARTIS, including a Russian trademark, registration number 534551, registered on February 13, 2015. The disputed domain name...Complainant in any form. The Complainant has already won a UDRP case against the Respondent in 2016, (See Novartis AG v. Domain Admin, Privacy Protection...
2019-07-09 - Case Details
WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2019-3207 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Chime Financial, Inc. v. Privacy...”) represented by Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C., United States. Respondent is Privacy Administrator, Anonymize, Inc., United States. 2. The Domain Name and...
2020-02-24 - Case Details
WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2020-0562 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Gearench v. Contact Privacy Inc. Customer...Germany. The Respondent is Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 1246504168, United States of America (“United States” or “US”) / amber boulden, United States. 2...
2020-06-04 - Case Details
Privacy Protection Foundation / Phillip Moo Case No. D2020-0844 1. The Parties The Complainant is The Chemours Company FC, LLC, United States of America...(“United States”), represented by Bates & Bates LLM, United States. The Respondent is Whois Privacy Protection Foundation, Netherlands / Phillip Moo, United...
2020-06-02 - Case Details
registering the disputed domain name, the Respondent employed a privacy service in order to hide its identity. The Complainant adds that the disputed domain...domain name was registered nor accordingly have chosen it fortuitously. In other words, according to UDRP previous decisions, the registration may...
2020-05-04 - Case Details
Patent and Trademark Office, Registration No. 3,989,369 for TEXTRAIL, effective July 5, 2011, - United States Patent and Trademark Office, Registration Nos...Cimpress Schweiz GmbH , WIPO Case No. DCO2017-0021 ; Syngenta Participations AG v. Simon Laidler / Who Is Agent, WhoIs Privacy Protection Service, Inc...
2021-02-02 - Case Details
Administrator, Fundacion Privacy Services LTD Case No. D2019-2722 1. The Parties The Complainant is Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., United States of America (the...“United States” or “USA”), represented by Sanchez Fischer Levine, LLP, United States. The Respondent is Domain Administrator, Fundacion Privacy Services LTD...
2019-12-17 - Case Details
Administrator, Fundacion Privacy Services LTD Case No. D2019-2724 1. The Parties The Complainant is Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., United States of America (the...“United States” or “USA”), represented by Sanchez Fischer Levine, LLP, United States. The Respondent is Domain Administrator, Fundacion Privacy Services LTD...
2019-12-17 - Case Details
Whoisproxy.com / Amir Cohen, Hush Privacy Protection Ltd. Case No. D2019-2246 1. The Parties The Complainant is American Honda Motor Co., Inc., United States of...Privacy Protection Ltd., Seychelles. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Key-Systems GmbH (the...
2019-11-18 - Case Details
United States Registration No. 3,991,011, registered on July 5, 2011 and United States Registration No. 4,418,706, registered on October 15, 2013. The...the Complainant’s trademark. Moreover, they have been used as part of a fraudulent scheme. The Respondent’s use of a privacy service further indicates...
2020-12-18 - Case Details
WIPO Case No. D2022-1508 ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Sands Capital Management, LP v. Withheld for Privacy ehf...Ropes & Gray LLP, United States. The Respondent is Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / John Ekene, Nigeria. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed...
2022-07-11 - Case Details
Registration / Privacy Protect, LLC / Zaid Mandre Case No. D2021-1852 1. The Parties Complainant is Philip Morris Products S.A., Switzerland (hereinafter...“Complainant”), represented by D.M. Kisch Inc., South Africa. Respondent is Private Registration, United Arab Emirates / Privacy Protect, LLC, United States of...
2021-08-16 - Case Details
WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2021-1909 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION RELX Group PLC v. Domain Admin / Privacy...represented by Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, L.L.P., United States of America (“United States” or “U.S”). The Respondent is Domain Admin / Privacy Protect...
2021-08-16 - Case Details
WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2021-2393 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Whois Privacy Protection...Sweden. The Respondent is Whois Privacy Protection Foundation, the Netherlands / Kestutis Mazeika, Lithuania. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed...
2021-11-08 - Case Details
WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2021-2366 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Sidley Austin LLP v. Withheld for Privacy...America (“United States”), self-represented. The Respondent is Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico...
2021-10-19 - Case Details
WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2021-0308 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Averitt Express, Inc. v. Super Privacy...represented by Adams and Reese LLP, United States of America. The Respondent is Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot, United States of America / Administrator...
2021-04-08 - Case Details
Respondent has used a privacy service for registration of the Domain Name and has not responded to the Complainant’s cease and desist letter which are both...services. The Respondent has used a privacy service to hide its identity. The inclusion of the words “tax”, “rebate” and “info” in the Domain Name itself...
2021-03-22 - Case Details
privacy service for registration of the Domain Name and has not responded to the Complainant’s cease and desist letter which are both also indications of...to register a domain name containing the Complainant’s mark which is well known for tax collection services. The Respondent has used a privacy service...
2021-03-22 - Case Details