The website
displays the Complainant’s PLUGPLAY mark and stylized P mark.
No further information is available about the Respondent.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. ...The Panel notes that the Respondent’s website states that it is the “Official Plug Play Carts Website,” it
displays the Complainant’s PLUGPLAY mark and stylized P device mark and contains images and visual
elements that resemble those on the Complainant’s own website. ...
2025-02-21 - Case Details
The Parties
The Complainants are The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”) and The Gillette Company LLC (“Gillette”), United States of America (the “United States” or “U.S.”), represented by Studio Barbero, Italy.
...The Panel grants the request.
Paragraph 10(e) of the Rules states that a “[p]anel shall decide a request by a Party to consolidate multiple domain name disputes in accordance with the Policy and these Rules.” ...
2019-10-24 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant objects to the use of the disputed domain name by the Respondent and bases its Complaint on the following grounds:
1. The simple replacement of the second “p” of the Complainant’s trademarks by the letter “b” in the domain name at issue does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity to the Complainant’s trademark.
2. ...The replacement of “p” by the letter “b” indicates an engagement by the Respondent in so-called “typo-squatting”. The Panel finds that the described minor differences do not prevent a finding of confusing similarity.
...
2007-11-13 - Case Details
To the best of the Complainant’s knowledge, the Respondent is not commonly known by the terms corresponding to the disputed domain names (“p del sur limitada”, with or without hyphens, or “p dell sur limitada”) or by the terms “procesadora de alimentos del sur limitada”, not having any trademark rights in these terms. ...The Complainant has alleged the Respondent has no license or authorization to use the Complainant’s trademark and is not commonly known by the disputed domain names not having any trademark rights on the terms “p del sur limitada”, “p dell sur limitada” or “procesadora de alimentos del sur limitada”. This effectively shifts the burden to the Respondent of producing rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names. ...
2020-02-10 - Case Details
Complainant owns numerous trademark registrations around the world, including the following registered Benelux trademarks with a right of priority of December 16, 2019: NEOLESK, FIDALTO, KELVRI, TIZAYA, BRAVAYIS, and ZELVRI (each a “Teva Mark” and collectively, the “Teva Marks”) as more specifically set forth in the Annex to the Complaint:
a) Benelux trademark NEOLESK, No. 1411177, registered on February 27, 2020, for use in connection with inter alia, “[p]harmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease” in class 5;
b) Benelux trademark FIDALTO, No. 1411182, registered on February 27, 2020, for use in connection with inter alia, “[p]harmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease” in class 5;
c) Benelux trademark KELVRI, No. 1411188, registered on February 27, 2020, for use in connection with inter alia, “[p]harmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease” in class 5;
d) Benelux trademark TIZAYA, No. 1411191, registered on February 27, 2020, for use in connection with inter alia, “[p]harmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease” in class 5;
e) Benelux trademark BRAVAYIS, No. 1411212, registered on February 27, 2020, for use in connection with inter alia, “[p]harmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease” in class 5; and
f) Benelux trademark ZELVRI, No. 1411200, registered on February 27, 2020, for use in connection with inter alia, “[p]harmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease” in class 5;
The priority date referenced in each of the above Benelux registrations for the respective Teva Mark is based on the fact that on December 16, 2019, Complainant filed an intent-to-use application to register each Teva Mark in the United States (Serial Nos. 88728516 (NEOLESK), 88728509 (FIDALTO), 88728518 (KELVRI), 88728521 (TIZAYA), 88728522 (BRAVAYIS), and 88728524 (ZELVRI)). Each US trademark application like the Benelux registrations, was in connection with “[p]harmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease” and a range of other pharmaceutical goods in class 5.
...
2020-05-11 - Case Details
Paz como administrador único de la firma Manufacturas C y P, S.A. que es, de hecho, a favor de quien se usa y se obtiene beneficio del uso del dominio controvertido, estando dicha firma en directa competencia con la sociedad demandante...Paz Corral como la sociedad de la que es administrador único (Manufacturas C y P, S.A.) son miembros de la Asociación Nacional de Poliestireno Expandido (ANAPE), desde 1.979.
- Que en todas las consultas realizadas por el Panel sobre índices de sociedades que operan en el sector del poliestireno expandido, aparecen tanto Manufacturas Pal, S.A. como Manufacturas C y P, S.A...
2003-07-10 - Case Details
APPLETON and Kamen TROLLER, Domain Name Arbitrations: A Review of Selected Decisions, in Bulletin of the Swiss Arbitration Association ("ASA"), No. 4, 2000, p. 725).
Determining whether a domain name and a service or trademark are confusingly similar is not an easy task because there is no guidance concerning what is meant by such terms in the Policy and Rules (see APPLETON, TROLLER, idem, p. 722).
...This entitles the Administrative Panel to draw any such inferences from such default as it considers appropriate pursuant to Paragraph 14 (b) of the Rules (see e.g. WIPO Cases Nos. D2000-0009, p. 6 or D2000-0867, p. 6; see also WIPO Case D2000-1350 cited).
It is the sole Panelist finding that the Complainant has established that the trademarks "CLUB MED" and "CLUB MEDITERRANEE" have been famous in Europe and the United States for quite a while. ...
2001-02-02 - Case Details
Whois ID Theft Protection,
WIPO Case No. D2006-1146, “it is open for the [p]anel to infer a prima facie case of bad faith registration. The [p]anel also notes that the [r]espondent has used the present domain name in a commercial website. ...Having reviewed various world geographical gazetteers, the [p]anel believes that there is no official city, state of province in China known as “Northampton”, “Northampton-shire” or “California”. ...
2010-10-15 - Case Details
Air France est plus particulièrement titulaire des marques
suivantes (cf. Plainte p. 10) :
- Air France + cheval ailé: marque internationale semi-figurative
désignant le Portugal N° R415038 du 21 mars 1975, renouvelée pour
la dernière fois le 21 mars 1995...Plainte p. 10-11 : décision du Tribunal de Grande Instance
de Paris du 16 octobre 2001; Air France v. Kitchkulture, Litige
OMPI N° D2002-0158; Société Air France v. ...
2002-12-20 - Case Details
Trademark
Country
Class
Registration Date
2125770
YPF SERVICLUB GNC (stylized)
Argentina
35
November 08, 2006
2125772
YPF SERVICLUB GNC (stylized)
Argentina
37
November 08, 2006
2055381
SERVICLUB Y P F
Argentina
45
May 31, 1995
2055379
SERVICLUB Y P F
Argentina
43
May 31, 1995
2128865
SERVICLUB Y P F
Argentina
41
May 08, 1996
3035431
SERVICLUB (stylized)
Argentina
36
October 02, 2000
The Complainant has filed sufficient evidence to demonstrate that it also owns other trademark registrations in Argentina comprising the term “serviclub”.
...Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant is the owner of trademark registrations that cover the YPF SERVICLUB GNC, SERVICLUB Y P F brand, and the SERVICLUB brand.
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks because it entirely incorporates the SERVICLUB trademark and a part of the YPF SERVICLUB GNC, and the SERVICLUB Y P F trademarks.
...
2015-02-05 - Case Details
The Panel notes that the address and city fields of the WhoIs record states “p t”.
According to the printout of the website resolved from the Disputed Domain Name given by the Complainant, the website was exclusively in English and associated various DVD products with the trade mark INSANITY. ...Further, the Respondent’s provision of contact particulars comprising a street named “p t” in a city named “p t” is of significance. The street “p t” and city “p t” are clearly fictitious. ...
2010-11-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is offering clothing and accessories under the MR P. trademark at the website under the
disputed domain name. The website has also used the Complainant’s MR PORTER trademark. ...The Complainant has been benefitting from trademark protection for MR PORTER and MR P. Moreover, the
Complainant’s MR PORTER trademarks are distinctive and enjoy a substantial reputation in the fashion
industry. ...
2022-10-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is European Travel Network with addresses at P O Box 025 216 SJO 1714, Miami, FL 33102-516, United States of America; P O Box 561, Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, 5600 AN, The Netherlands; and in Costa Rica.
2. ...On the same day the Center transmitted by fax and by mail copies of the foregoing documents to:
European Travel Network
P O Box 025 216 - SJO 1714
Miami, FL 33102-516
United States of America
European Travel Network
P O Box 561, Eindhoven
Noord-Brabant, 5600 AN
The Netherlands
World NIC Name Host
Network Solutions, Inc
505 Huntmar Park Drive
Herndon, VA 20170
United States of America
On August 29, 2000, the Center advised the Complainant that Paragraph VIII of the Complaint, Mutual Jurisdiction, did not comply with paragraph 3(b) (xiii) of the Rules, which provides that the Complaint must
"(xiii)State that Complainant will submit with respect to any challenges to a decision in the administrative proceeding cancelling or transferring the domain name, to the jurisdiction of the Courts in at least one specified Mutual Jurisdiction."
...
2000-11-02 - Case Details
D2000-0641, on virtually identical facts to this complaint, a respondent
who was in the business of selling discount travel products and who was using
the words "Singapore Airlines" was ordered to transfer the domain
name "singaporeairlines.org" (among others) to the Complainant. Similarly,
in Singapore Airlines Limited v P&P Servicios de Communication S.L.,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0643, the respondent
was ordered to transfer the domain name "singaporeairlines.com" to
the Complainant.
6.2 Illegitimacy
The Panel finds that the Respondents have no rights or legitimate interests in the contested domain name. ...See Singapore Airlines Limited
v European Travel Network, WIPO Case No.
D2000-0641 and Singapore Airlines Limited v P&P Servicios de Communication
S.L., WIPO Case No. D2000-0643;
(b) the Respondents could not have possibly ignored the fact that the "Singapore Airlines" mark is widely and uniquely associated with the Complainant’s international airline and other services offered by the Complainant. ...
2001-06-25 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
The Chicago Tribune Company v. Jose P. Varkey
Case No. D2000-0133
1. The Parties
1.1 The Complainant is The Chicago Tribune Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Illinois, United States of America, having its principal place of business in Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
1.2 The Respondent is Jose P. ...Scott Donahey
Presiding Panelist
Sally M. Abel
and Andrew P. Bridges
Panelists
Dated: May 9, 2000...
2000-05-12 - Case Details
The Arbitrator therefore concludes that the Domain Name was not registered nor has been used in bad faith and the condition of Section 7.2 p.2 of the .se Policy is not fulfilled.
C. The Domain Holder has no rights or justified interest in the Domain Name.
As the condition of bad faith is not fulfilled (Section 7.2 p.2 of the .se Policy), the Arbitrator finds that there is no reason to assess whether the Domain Holder has any right or justified interest in the Domain Name.
8. ...
2019-09-27 - Case Details
Die Gesuchstellerin ist Inhaberin der kombinierten Marke DIE LUZERNER BANK – LUZERNER KANTONALBANK, Marke Nr. P-439588, die in Klasse 36 für Versicherungswesen, Finanzwesen, Geldgeschäfte und Immobilienwesen eingetragen ist. ...Sodann macht die Gesuchstellerin geltend, der Domain-Name verletze ihre Marke Nr. P-439588 DIE LUZERNER BANK – LUZERNER KANTONALBANK, welche am 3. Mai 1996 hinterlegt wurde. Sie macht geltend, der Domain-Name sei eine ihr Markenrecht verletzende identische Übernahme der Marke. ...
2010-06-23 - Case Details
Wie im Fall dokumentiert, verwendet die Gruppe der Gesuchstellerin den Namen „Robertson“ als Kennzeichnungsbestandteil seit 1951, etwa seit der Gründung der ersten Gesellschaft durch John P. Robertson.
5. Parteivorbringen
A. Gesuchstellerin
Die Gesuchstellerin behauptet, die Registrierung der streitgegenständlichen Domain-namen verletze ihre Markrechte. ...Er räumt zu, dass nach dem Rückzug des Gründers John P. Robertson aus dem Geschäft zirka 1983, verschiedene Gesellschaften in der Schweiz diesen Firmenbestandteil parallel geführt haben. ...
2013-12-27 - Case Details
The disputed domain name incorporates its CUSTOMS SUPPORT trademark in its entirety and adds an obvious misspelling by the omission of the second letter “p” in the word “support”. The omission of the letter “p” in the disputed domain name is clearly an intentional misspelling of the CUSTOMS SUPPORT trademark, and does not alter the finding of confusing similarity between the disputed domain name and the CUSTOMS SUPPORT trademark.
...Identical or Confusingly Similar
Once the gTLD “.com” is ignored (which is appropriate in this case), the disputed domain name consists of the text string contained in the Complainant’s stylized CUSTOMS SUPPORT trademark, without one of the letters “p”. The Complainant’s trademark is clearly recognizable within the disputed domain name. The omission of the letter “p” does not avoid the confusing similarity of the disputed domain name with the Complainant’s trademark.
...
2022-02-25 - Case Details
The Claimant has established ownership of the Swiss national word and device marks PARTNERS GROUP PASSION FOR ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (P-535886), PARTNERS GROUP PASSION FOR PRIVATE MARKETS (598917), and PARTNERS GROUP REALIZING POTENTIAL IN PRIVATE MARKETS (678787).
...Weber, E-Commerce und Recht, Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen elektronischer Geschäftsformen, 2. Aufl, Zurich 2010, p. 159; BSK UWG-Arpagaus, Art. 3 para. 1 lit. d N 199; see also Cembra Money Bank AG v. Canan Siddik, Canankredit,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-09-03 - Case Details