Lorna Kang a/k/a Yong Li a/k/a Mahmoud Nadim a/k/a The Data in Bulkregister.com’s WHOIS Database is p a/k/a Amjad Kausar, WIPO Case No. D2005-0635.)
For the purpose of these proceedings, the Panel has accepted that that single entity is the named Respondent, Paul Klerck. ...
2008-10-01 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings
As with the UDRP, the Policy makes no provision for
unsolicited submissions and these are usually considered by panels only in exceptional
circumstances when the party filing an unsolicited submission explains those
circumstances and why the material could not have been submitted initially:
Gordon Sumner, p/k/a Sting v. Michael Urvane, WIPO
Case No. D2000-0596. The Complainant has not shown exceptional circumstances
and has not explained why the contents of its unsolicited submission could not
have been submitted earlier. ...
2007-02-01 - Case Details
D2006-0237 (April 18, 2006); Sound Unseen, Ltd.; Apple Bottoms, LLC; and Cornell Haynes p/k/a “Nelly” v. Patrick Vanderhorst, WIPO Case No. D2005-0636 (August 18, 2005); True Blue Productions, Inc. v. ...
2007-03-16 - Case Details
Xtraplus Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0125, Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847. The Panel will therefore now proceed to a discussion of the third element of the Policy.
...
2007-05-24 - Case Details
Como afirmó recientemente el rector de la Demandante (ver periódico Excélsior de fecha 8 de mayo de 2009, fútbol, p.3) a propósito de su equipo de fútbol soccer: “Los Tigres de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León han sido siempre de la institución y por ello reciben todas las facilidades que piden y necesiten… tiene una gran cantidad de seguidores, muchos de ellos universitarios y egresados”, lo cual resulta igualmente aplicable a su equipo de fútbol americano, del cual la Demandada es uno de tantos ex-jugadores y seguidores que tiene.
...
2009-05-26 - Case Details
Así, un bajo grado de similitud
entre los productos o servicios designados puede ser compensado por un elevado
grado de similitud entre las marcas, y a la inversa” (Sentencia de 29
de septiembre de 1998, apartado 19, asunto C-39/97, Canon Kabushiki Kaisha y
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. anteriormente Pathe Communications Corporation, Recopilación,
1998, p. I-5532)
Pues bien, frente a lo que sucede en el Derecho español y comunitario de marcas, en la Política lo único que se exige es valorar si los signos que componen la marca y el nombre de dominio son confundibles, de modo que el público normalmente informado y razonablemente atento y perspicaz pueda creer que se trata de los mismos signos, o al menos que el titular de la marca y el nombre de dominio coinciden, o que siendo diferentes media entre ellos algún tipo de vínculo.
...
2006-08-02 - Case Details
For 1300 933 346 (which corresponds to 1300WEDDINGS), Mister Magnets P/L t/a AmeriTel Enterprises is the winning bidder, while Multi National Concepts is the ROU holder. ...
2009-06-17 - Case Details
As indicated in WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.10.1, “[p]anels have recognized that merely registering
a domain name comprised of a dictionary word or phrase does not by itself automatically confer rights or
legitimate interests on the respondent”.
...
2022-12-13 - Case Details
Respondent states it has received no
money from the Domain Name’s website, and that the site is under the exclusive control of the Registrar;
however, these points are of no moment – as indicated by section 3.5 of WIPO Overview 3.0, “[p]articularly
with respect to ‘automatically’ generated pay-per-click links, panels have held that a respondent cannot
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 8
disclaim responsibility for content appearing on the website associated with its domain name (nor would such
links ipso facto vest the respondent with rights or legitimate interests).
...
2024-03-12 - Case Details
The first shipment was made in April 2005. With its p...
The NYX PROFESSIONAL MAKEUP trademark was created in 1999 and is a global brand available in over 70 countries at thousands of retailers consisting of specialty beauty and fashion stores, freestanding shops, and beauty supply stores, as well as on the...
...
2023-10-19 - Case Details
Segundo o art. 1º da Resolução CGI.br/RES/2008/008/P do Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil, via de
regra, um nome de domínio disponível é concedido ao primeiro requerente que satisfaz, quando do
requerimento, as exigências para o seu registro. ...
2023-05-11 - Case Details
On November 23, 2023, the Registrar transmitted
by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed
domain name which differed from the named Respondent (either Sunil Kumar Chunduru, CK’s Edvantage
Education (P) Limited, or Manhattan Review Education Private Limited) and contact information in the
Complaint. ...
2024-02-09 - Case Details
As noted in the WIPO Overview
3.0, section 2.11, “[p]anels tend to assess claimed respondent rights or legitimate interests in the present,
i.e., with a view to the circumstances prevailing at the time of the filing of the complaint”. ...
2022-05-16 - Case Details
Moreover, the Complainants, through its counsel, attempted to give the impression that the Delhi High Court has upheld the Complainants’ rights in HSIL and SHIL but the supporting documents filed as Annexes P-10 to the Complaint do not pertain to the trademarks HSIL and SHIL but to the Complainants’ trademark HINDWARE. ...
2021-04-07 - Case Details
ArcelorMittal is also a member of more than 120 indices, including: EURO STOXX 50, CAC40, AEX, FTSE Eurotop 100, MSCI Pan-Euro, DJ Stoxx 600, S&P Europe 500, Bloomberg World Index, IBEX 35 index and NYSE Composite Index.
ArcelorMittal has received various awards and recognitions in the industry. ...
2021-03-17 - Case Details
It appears that this domain name was created and used by Complainant prior to Respondent’s recent renewal of the domain name; the Panel’s review of selected historical images of the “www.vancesfoods.com” website from 2002 through 2017 shows that the website was used to promote Complainant and its VANCE’S DARIFREE products (see, e.g., https://web.archive.org/web/20020802004333/http://vancesfoods.com/main.asp?p=home, https://web.archive.org/web/20170917000337/http://vancesfoods.com/). Complainant alleges that Dan Shail “wrongfully renewed registration” of this domain name.At the time of the filing of the Complaint and the Amended Complaint, the disputed domain name resolved to a website that contained links promoting “FiberSweet” and “DariFree” products. ...
2021-04-16 - Case Details
The disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which Complainant has rights: (i) , , , , , , identically reproduce Complainant’s WHATSAPP trademark in conjunction with descriptive terms (such as “alertas”, “tm-“, “masivo”, “masivos”, “marketing”, “bulk”, “em massa”) under the “.com” and “.marketing” generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs), which additions do not distinguish the disputed domain names in any material way; and (ii) the remaining two disputed domain names and consist of common or obvious misspellings or typos of the WHATSAPP trademark, the only difference being the omission of the letters “h”, “t” or “p” and the addition of the generic term “marketing”.
Respondents have no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names. ...
2018-10-18 - Case Details
PrivacyYes.com, Igor Spodin,
WIPO Case No. D2013-1568, ; Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and "Madonna.com",
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847, ; Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter Plc v. ...
2018-08-30 - Case Details
As explained at paragraph 4.11.2 of the WIPO Overview 3.0, in considering whether consolidation is appropriate “[p]anels have considered a range of factors, typically present in some combination….. such as similarities in or relevant aspects of (i) the registrants’ identity(ies) including pseudonyms, (ii) the registrants’ contact information including email address(es), postal address(es), or phone number(s), including any pattern of irregularities, (iii) relevant IP addresses, name servers, or webhost(s), (iv) the content or layout of websites corresponding to the disputed domain names, (v) the nature of the marks at issue (e.g., where a registrant targets a specific sector), (vi) any naming patterns in the disputed domain names (e.g., or )…..”.
...
2018-01-08 - Case Details
As set forth in section 4.6 of WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”): “Unsolicited supplemental filings are generally discouraged, unless specifically requested by the panel…. [P]anels have repeatedly affirmed that the party submitting or requesting to submit an unsolicited supplemental filing should clearly show its relevance to the case and why it was unable to provide the information contained therein in its complaint or response. ...
2017-12-14 - Case Details