The Parties
The Complainant is Qwest Communications International, Inc., C/O Christine
P. Searls, Esq., 1801 California Street, Suite 3800, Denver, CO 80202, United
States of America, of United States of America, represented by Townsend and
Townsend and Crew, LLP of United States of America.
...
2003-03-13 - Case Details
D2001-1463, February 25, 2002: transfer to and acquisition
by a Respondent of a domain name in bad faith can be treated as equivalent to
registration of the domain name in bad faith; and Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a
Madonna v. Dan Parisi and "Madonna.com," WIPO
Case No. D2000-0847, October 12, 2000: Here, although Respondent
was not the original registrant, the record shows he acquired the registration
in bad faith. ...
2003-06-23 - Case Details
Stile’s e-mail of July 8) is as follows:-
"The Client agrees to pay the Company’s charges and indemnify the Company for any legal goods, performances, services undertaken or provided by the Company and for all costs and expenses (including legal fees and expenses on a solicitor and barrister and own Client basis) in respect of the recovery of any outstanding amounts due under this Contract or in respect of any claim or alleged claim by the Client against the Company howsoever arising, or in any other legal matter or dispute between the Client and the Company." (The Panelist’s emphasis).
(p) Purporting to act on the basis of these standard terms and conditions, the Respondent on July 9, 2001, issued an invoice to Freshfields in the sum of £337.23.
...
2001-10-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Multi Level Internet Marketing, Jorge Clapes, 103 ave Nte Y P Gral Escalon B5, SV San Salvador, El Salvador.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar:
The Domain Name at issue is . ...
2001-07-31 - Case Details
This contention is then rebutted by the Respondent (Response, p 6) with the explanation that these services were, in any event, associated with a banner inserted on his sites by Register.com and were in no way connected to him. ...
2001-01-24 - Case Details
The Complainant is represented by Mr. Robert S. Draper and Mr. James P. Jenal of O’Melveny & Myers, LLP of Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
The Respondents are (i) natwestfraud.com and (ii) Umang Malhotra of San Diego, California, U.S.A. ...
2001-06-28 - Case Details
Dícese del estanciero que se dedica a la cría de ganado.
Real Academia Española Diccionario - 1992, p. 763
Considering the will of
the Respondent in registering and using a domain name containing this word,
it is obligatory to take into account that the word "hacendado" is
a generic word in the Spanish language, and that for it meaning should be associated
by the public more with something related with the possession of lands and buildings
than with any other thing. ...
2001-05-29 - Case Details
On the same day the Center transmitted by fax and by mail copies of the foregoing documents to:
Bob Thomson
2 Devon Road
Quarrendon
Aylesbury
Buckinghamshire HP19 3GX
United Kingdom
and to:
Cheap Domain Reg.
eshoppers.com, Inc
P O Box 1282
Manitowoc
WI 54221
United States of America
A Response was received from the Respondent on October 1, 2000 [electronic version] and on October 6, 2000 [hard copy]. ...
2000-11-20 - Case Details
The Parties
The Complainant is Cadbury Limited a company incorporated under the laws of the United Kingdom with its registered office at P O Box 12, Bournville Lane, Bournville, Birmingham B30 2LU. It is represented in this matter by Dawn Osborne of Willoughby & Partners, London, United Kingdom.
...
2000-12-13 - Case Details
Further, use
which intentionally trades on the fame of another cannot constitute a ‘bona
fide’ offering of goods or services: Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan
Parisi and "Madonna.com" (WIPO
Case No. D2000-0847).
Under these circumstances the Panel finds that Respondent has not demonstrated
that it has any rights or legitimate interests in the domain name
.
...
2002-04-22 - Case Details
Il ressort des enquêtes menées par le requérant (cf.
Plainte, p. 6/7 et Annexe B), qui n'ont pas été contredites par
l'intimé, qu'Adminet n'a aucune présence ni existence en Australie
et que M. ...
2002-06-06 - Case Details
IRG Coins and Ink Source, Inc., WIPO
Case No. D2000-0090; Stralfors AB v. P D S AB, WIPO
Case No. D2000-0112; InfoSpace.com, Inc. v. Ofer, WIPO
Case No. D2000-0075.
To quote a prior Panel decision, "[B]ecause Respondent is contributing no value-added
to the Internet -- it is merely attempting to exploit a general rule of registration
-- the broad community of Internet users will be better served by transferring
the domain name to a party with a legitimate use for it." ...
2001-08-10 - Case Details
The Complainant asserts that the "tylenol.net" domain name was placed on "Hold" due to the Respondent’s failure to respond to NSI (a copy of the NSI letter was attached as Annex P).
During this proceeding, the Complainant asserts that it did receive a letter, dated March 23, 1999, from the Respondent in which the Respondent stated that: (1) "[d]omain names rightfully belong to the registrant/purchaser" that first registers them; (2) the Complainant’s own failure to promptly register the domain name "tylenol.net" is inexcusable neglect, justifying the Respondent’s registration of the name; (3) the TYLENOL trademark has been so diluted that it is no longer perceived as a distinct brand but rather a generic term for acetaminophen; and (4) the Complainant had no trademark rights to the word "www.tylenol.net" only to the word TYLENOL® in capital letters. ...
2001-03-28 - Case Details
It has been held that use which intentionally trades on the fame of another
cannot constitute a ‘bona fide’ offering of goods or services: Madonna Ciccone,
p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and "Madonna.com", WIPO
Case No. D2000-0847. Accordingly the Panel must determine whether Mr. ...
2004-03-03 - Case Details
Complainant’s word mark, FAMILY POLICY FOUNDATION, was registered with the United States Patent
and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) on its Supplemental Register under registration no. 5038145 on
September 6, 2016, with a date of first use in commerce listed as March 24, 2016. The mark is registered in
class 35 for “[p]ublic advocacy to promote public awareness of the benefits of religious liberty, marriage and
family, and the sanctity of life for our nation; providing on-line information, namely, commentary in the field of
public policy; and providing business support staff services for non-profit entities that advance biblical
citizenship through equipping statesmen, promoting public policy, amplifying the voice of pro-family
Americans and strengthening an effective alliance of state-based policy allies.” ...Under WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.6.1, “[t]o support fair use under UDRP paragraph 4(c)(iii),
the respondent’s criticism must be genuine and noncommercial.” Further, section 2.6.2 states that “[p]anels
find that even a general right to legitimate criticism does not necessarily extend to registering or using a
domain name identical to a trademark (i.e., (including typos)); even where such a domain
name is used in relation to genuine noncommercial free speech, panels tend to find that this creates an
impermissible risk of user confusion through impersonation.”
...
2024-04-10 - Case Details
D2000-0581 - https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/d2000-0581.html
- Gordon Sumner, p/k/a Sting v Michael Urvan Case No. D2000-0596 - https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/d2000-0596.html
- Daniel C. ...o) La Demandada no ha registrado el dominio para venderlo, alquilarlo o transferirlo, sino para un uso cultural y sin ánimo de lucro alguno.
p) No ha existido por parte de la Demandada intención alguna de monopolizar el nombre de dominio en disputa ni de impedir que nadie pudiera gozar de dominios parecidos.
8. ...
2001-02-27 - Case Details
D2000-0581 - https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/d2000-0581.html
- Gordon Sumner, p/k/a Sting v Michael Urvan Case No. D2000-0596 - https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/d2000-0596.html
- Daniel C. ...o) La Demandada no ha registrado el dominio para venderlo, alquilarlo o transferirlo, sino para un uso cultural y sin ánimo de lucro alguno.
p) No ha existido por parte de la Demandada intención alguna de monopolizar el nombre de dominio en disputa ni de impedir que nadie pudiera gozar de dominios parecidos.
8. ...
2001-02-27 - Case Details
Internetco Corp. Case No. D2000-0581.
- Gordon Sumner, p/k/a Sting v Michael Urvan Case No. D2000-0596.
- Daniel C. Marino, Jr. v. Video Images Productions, et al. ...o) La Demandada no ha registrado el dominio para venderlo, alquilarlo o transferirlo,
sino para un uso cultural y sin ánimo de lucro alguno.
p) No ha existido por parte de la Demandada intención alguna de monopolizar
el nombre de dominio en disputa ni de impedir que nadie pudiera gozar de dominios
parecidos.
8. ...
2001-02-27 - Case Details
It is undisputed that a representative of Complainant Workman (P. Upton) contacted Respondent by email on March 30, 2011 to purchase the Domain Name. Respondent answered by email that he would consider “any offers” but that “it will have to be a serious offer for me to consider selling it.” ...
2011-07-11 - Case Details
Zhijun Guo,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0184; LEGO Juris A/S v. P N S Enterprises,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0170; LEGO Juris A/S v. David Palmer, WIPO Case D2008-1826; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2013-02-21 - Case Details