ROWE PRICE is fully included in the disputed domain name (except for the dot after the “t”). Merely a “p” has been included, which is, however, an adjacent keyboard letter to the “o” which follows the “p”. In the second disputed domain name , the “p” has been omitted while the “i” has been doubled. Therefore, the Panel concludes that in both cases, the disputed domain names contain sufficiently recognizable aspects of the mark T. ...
2019-10-25 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
UITSPRAAK GESCHILLENBESLECHTER
CIP B.V. v. Uitgeverij P. Boekhout
Zaaknr. DNL2019-0018
1. Partijen
De Eiser is CIP B.V., Nederland, vertegenwoordigd door VanToorn Legal, Nederland.
De Verweerder is Uitgeverij P. Boekhout, Nederland, vertegenwoordigd door Boekx Advocaten, Nederland.
2. De Domeinnaam
De onderhavige domeinnaam is geregistreerd bij SIDN via Provider.nl en zal hierna als de “Domeinnaam” worden aangeduid.
3. ...
2019-09-03 - Case Details
Factual Background
The facts stated in the Complaint are as follows:
(1) The Complainant is one of Japan's biggest chemical companies, with the financial year 1999-2000 net sales (including consolidated subsidiaries) exceeding
1,194.4 billion Japanese Yen (approximately 11,163 million US Dollars) (see Annex C, p.3, to the Complaint). The Complainant's main activities, each of which is carried out or by reference to its name, "Asahi-Kasei", are the production and distribution of wide range of chemicals and plastics (including the conclusion of joint venture agreement with the Dow Chemical Company in September 1999), housing and construction materials (including famous Hebel Haus and Hebel Mezon) and fibers and textiles (such as newly developed Roica BZ), as well as many other products and services (see Annex C, p.1, to the Complaint). ...The site includes the information about the Complainant's corporate activities and subsidiaries, many of which have corporate names including the word "Asahi-Kasei" (see Annex C, p.56-7, to the Complaint).
(4) Prior to the issuing of the Complaint, the Complainant made substantial efforts to identify the contact detials of the Respondent. ...
2001-02-14 - Case Details
The Complainant stated that it "trades in Turkey as Commercial Union and not as CGNU PLC" (Complainant's Complaint, V-12, p. 7). As mentioned above, it explained later on that it had changed its name, Commercial Union Assurance Company P.L.C., to CGU International Insurance P.L.C.
...This entitles the Administrative Panel to draw any such inferences from such default as it considers appropriate pursuant to Paragraph 14 (b) of the Rules (see e.g. WIPO Cases Nos. D2000-0009, p. 6 or D2000-0867, p. 6).
The Complainant has now established its trademarks rights in the manner described above. ...
2001-04-05 - Case Details
Alexei Vostrikov / none, Alexey Litvin / Vostrykov Alexiy P.
Case No. D2012-1437
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Conversbank Public Joint Stock Company of Kyiv, Ukraine, represented by Andriy S. ...Moreover, for completeness it should be stated that the responses to the Panel’s procedural order confirm that the Respondent is the same person who is identified in the original Complaint as Vostrykov Alexiy P. of Moscow.
4. Factual Background
The Panel has had some difficulty in deciphering the facts from the papers before him. ...
2012-09-28 - Case Details
Respondent’s pages are not limited to Rolex reseller links but also include Omega, Gucci and other brands (Complainant’s Exhibit P). “www.rolexlosangeles.com”, for example, does not appear to link to any Rolex dealers in Los Angeles (Complaint’s Exhibit Q). ...BlueHost.com Inc., Ben Ahmed Nejib,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0891 (“The [p]anel accepts the [c]omplainant’s contentions that a disclaimer is ineffective to dispel bad faith in the use of the [d]omain [n]ame, as by the time Internet users see the disclaimer, the unauthorised use has already occurred, and Internet traffic has already been diverted to the [w]ebsite”); Avon Products, Inc. v. ...
2010-09-14 - Case Details
The Respondent’s website also used as the browser icon the symbol “P.” in the same font as the Complainant’s “P.” logo and in which the dot was depicted in pink. In addition, the letter “o” in the name was depicted in pink in the same shade as used on the Complainant’s website such as for the dot element of its “P.” logo.
After the Complaint was filed, the website was changed so that the “P.” logo no longer appeared as the browser icon; the solid pink “o” in the word “PolkaHub” was changed to a hollow, pink “o” and a disclaimer has been added at the foot of the landing page “Polkadot.com is in no way affiliated with Web3 Foundation or Parity Technologies. ...
2022-02-16 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Carrefour SA. and Atacadão - Distribuição, Comércio E Indústria LTDA. v.
Nikolai P. Golovenkov
Case No. D2023-2576
1. The Parties
The Complainants are Carrefour SA, France, and Atacadão - Distribuição, Comércio E Indústria LTDA.,
Brazil, represented by IP Twins, France.
The Respondent is Nikolai P. Golovenkov, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name () is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...
2023-10-09 - Case Details
See: Digital City, Inc. v. Smalldomain For Sale (D2000-1283),
at p.6. (back to text)
4. See: Euromarket Designs, Inc. d/b/a Crate & Barrel v. Domain
For Sale VMI (D2000-1195); Bayerische
Motoren Werke AG v. ...See: Pharmacia & Upjohn AB v. Dario H. Romero (D2000-1273),
at p.6; Telstra Corporation, Ltd. v. Nuclear Marshmallows (D2000-0003),
at p.8. (back to text)...
2001-06-14 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on February 24, 2015.
The Center appointed William P. Knight as the sole panelist in this matter on February 27, 2015. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
William P. Knight
Sole Panelist
Date: March 2, 2015...
2015-03-11 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on March 12, 2015.
The Center appointed William P. Knight as the sole panelist in this matter on March 24, 2015. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with Paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
William P. Knight
Sole Panelist
Date: March 26, 2015...
2015-04-07 - Case Details
Sie ist Inhaberin zahlreicher Marken mit dem Element MIGROS, darunter die Marken MIGROS (Wortmarke) Nr P-415060 und MTRAVEL (Wortbildmarke) P-416095 mit Prioritäten von 1994 welche insbesondere für Reisedienstleistungen der Klasse 39 geschützt sind.
...
2010-09-08 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent's default on June 21, 2010.
The Center appointed William P. Knight as the sole panelist in this matter on June 25, 2010. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the Disputed Domain Name, be transferred to the Complainant.
William P. Knight
Sole Panelist
Dated: June 30, 2010...
2010-07-15 - Case Details
Die Gesuchstellerin ist Inhaberin der schweizerischen Marke TRIKORA (Nr. P-505391) für Produkte und Dienstleistungen in den Klassen 14, 16, 18, 21, 22, 24, 35, 28, 34 und 35. ...Bestand von Kennzeichenrechten
Die Gesuchstellerin hat dargetan, dass sie Inhaberin der schweizerischen Marke TRIKORA (Nr. P-505391) für Produkte und Dienstleistungen in den Klassen 14, 16, 18, 21, 22, 24, 35, 28, 34 und 35. ist. ...
2021-08-20 - Case Details
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade mark as it is a typo-squatting variation thereof, adding a third “p”.
The Respondent lacks rights and legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name.
There is no evidence of use, or demonstrable preparations to use, the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. ...In this case, the disputed domain name consists of the Complainant’s mark, except that it adds an extra “p”, converting “pp” into “ppp”. Furthermore, as explained in section 6C below, the disputed domain name is plainly an intentional misspelling of the Complainant’s mark.
...
2021-11-09 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on August 16, 2017.
The Center appointed William P. Knight as the sole panelist in this matter on August 24, 2017. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
William P. Knight
Sole Panelist
Date: August 29, 2017...
2017-09-08 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent's default on June 22, 2017.
The Center appointed William P. Knight as the sole panelist in this matter on July 4, 2017. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with Paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
William P. Knight
Sole Panelist
Date: July 17, 2017...
2017-07-27 - Case Details
IRG Coins and Ink Source, Inc., Case
No. D2000-0090, p. 3.
b) Respondent’s Altered Use of Domain Name. After Complainant’s agent, Marksmen, unsuccessfully attempted several times to contact Respondent, Respondent altered its use of its domain name. ...Neuberger Berman Inc. v.
Alfred Jacobsen, Case No. D2000-0323,
p. 5. I am satisfied that in this case the Respondent has engaged in typo-piracy
activities and that for these reasons also I find that the Domain Name has been
registered and used in bad faith.
7. ...
2001-09-26 - Case Details
The Complaint asserts that both of these Registrations "are in full force and effect" and that "[p]ursuant to Section 15 of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1066, both of these marks have become incontestable." ...Instead Respondent denies "any intent to use disputed domain names for any unlawful purpose or for the purpose of being misleading or confusing to others." Response, p. 14. A Statement offered as being subject to perjury penalties is provided to confirm that Ms. Suard believed she was acting in good faith.
...
2000-12-19 - Case Details
There are two sorts of remedies against a “disappointing” decision (as the Counsel for the Claimant terms the prior decision in the present case—p. 6 of the Complaint).
The normal remedy in a judicial context would be appeal. However, in the proceedings under the Rules of Procedure (as under the UDRP) appeal is not known. ...Suffice it to say that contrary to the allegations of the Complaint (p. 6), the prior decision was not based mainly on the absence of evidence of the relationship between Mr. ...
2009-02-18 - Case Details